Jurnal Konstitusi
Not a member yet
576 research outputs found
Sort by
Kontrak Karya PT Freeport Indonesia dalam Perspektif Pancasila dan UUD NRI 1945
PT Freeport Indonesia (PT FI) has a Contract of Work (KK) to undertake mining materials in Grasberg and Ertsberg mining areas which has begun in 1967 and will end in 2021. Since the promulgation of Law No. 4 of 2009 on Mineral and Coal Mining (UU Minerba), regulation on mineral and coal undertaking has been in accordance with Pancasila (State Ideology) and the 1945 Constitution, however, because UU Minerba can only be effective for legal actions after its promulgation therefore items related to KK before the existence of that law cannot be regulated. On the other hand, the existence of KK of PT FI is considered to be in violation with Pancasila namely The Fifth Principle “Social Justice for The Whole People of Indonesia”, and Article 33 (3) of 1945 Constitution concerning the substance of land, water, and natural wealth ‘shall be controlled by the State’ and ‘for maximum use for people’s welfare’. This article shall discuss on whether KK of PT FI has been in accordance with Pancasila and the1945 Constitution? And what should Government do in order KK of PT FI can be regulated within the frame of Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution? The method used in this writing is juridical normative. Based on the writer’s analysis, KK of PT FI is violating Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. The effort to adjust it to Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution shall be conducted through renegotiation of KK of PT FI based on “hardship” principle in UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts and principle of natural resources for national interest and people’s welfare in the Resolution of General Assembly Resolution 1803 (XVII) of 14 December 1962, “Permanent Sovereignty Over Natural Resources
Konstruksi Yuridis Politik Legislasi DPD Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 92/PUU-X/2012
The position of Regional Representative Council in the context of the implementation of the legislative function has an important role in order to create the principle of checks and balances between state institutions which include the House of Representatives and the President. Contextually Constitutional Court Decision No. 92/PUU-X/2012 reinforce the DPD position both in terms of national legislation program planning, delivery of opinions, views, list of inventory issues, and discussion of a draft law. Much progress has been achieved but in the political realm seems legislative authority of the DPD is still not perfect when not reached the stage of deciding to join a draft law being discussed. In order to strengthen DPD as part of regional representation, the amendments to the Constitution of 1945 was important to conduct state institutional arrangement holistically and comprehensively
Ultra Petita dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi
Ultra petita decision practiced under the MK’s jurisdiction to review the constitutionality of legislation needs to be assessed carefully. This practice should not be condemned as illegitimate because there is no explicit constitutional rule that guarantee it. The author therefore argues that this practice can be justified under two reasons. First, judicial activism. Second, the very nature of constitutional adjudication in order to defend the supremacy of the constitution over legislation. According to these reasons, the MK’s ultra petita decision should be upheld because this practice is the most reasonable means to protect the constitution
Penyelesaian Sengketa Pilkada Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013
The problem to be studied in this paper is which body has the authority to resolve election disputes after the decision of the Constitutional Court? What are the considerations that the court overturned its own authority to resolve dispute elections? Based on the results of analysis it can be concluded that; first, based on the decision No. 97 / PUU-XI / 2013 of the Constitutional Court, it is considered that, “... the legislators are also able to determine that direct elections were not part of the formal Election as mentioned in section 22E of the 1945 Constitution. So that the dispute of the result is determined as an additional authority of the Supreme Court .. . “The second, the most appropriate agency to handle election disputes is the Supreme Court, which then delegates to the High Court in each region. If litigants are not satisfied with the decision of the High Court, they may appeal to the Supreme Court. Meanwhile, Law No. 1 2015 About Election of governors, regents, and mayors, was handed over to the Constitutional Court (although temporary) to resolve the election disputes. Therefore, it is immediate to establish regulations particularly the governing competent institution to resolve election disputes
Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012 Bagi Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis dan Keuangan Syariah
The Decision of Constitutional Court No. 93/PUU-X/2012 regarding Judicial Review of Law No. 21/2008 regarding Sharia Banking with the Indonesian Constitution 1945 was giving a strong statement that the explanation of this a quolawhas a potential impact to arise legal uncertainty and legal confuse, meanwhile Article 55 in the whole still conform with the Constitution. The juridical implication from this a quodecision, i.e. The tribunal of District Court have to state if they have no authority to settle the case in sharia banking, althought it has been agreed in an akad (agreement). It has been stressed with the nature of Constitutional Court Decision “final and binding” and also bind all of citizens (erga omnes). Then, the opportunity to implement of its decision to sharia businees and financial institutions exist based on analogy, esp argumentum a fortiory. The expectation, it will give legal certainty in the context of Judicial that has an authority to settle the potential dispute between customer and sharia business and financial institutions
Pertanggungjawaban Presiden dan Mahkamah Konstitusi
PendAhuluAnLord Acton dalam sebuah surat mengingatkan bahwa, power trends to corrupt and absolute power corrupt absolutely.375 Oleh sebab itu, seorang pemikir besar mengenai negara dan hukum dari Perancis bernama Charles de Secondat baron de Labrede et de Montesquieu memisahkan kekuasaan memerintah negara yang dilaksanakan oleh masing-masing badan yang berdiri sendiri. Dengan ajarannya itu Montesquieu berpendapat bahwa:“Apabila kekuasaan negara itu dipisahkan secara tegas menjadi tiga, yaitu: kekuasaan perundang-undangan, kekuasaan melaksanakan pemerintahan, dan kekuasaan kehakiman, dan masing-masing kekuasaan itu dipegang oleh badan yang berdiri sendiri, ini akan menghilangkan kemungkinan timbulnya tindakan yang sewenang-wenang dari seorang penguasa, atau tegasnya tidak memberikan kemungkinan dilaksanakannya sistem pemerintahan absolutisme.” ..
Politik Hukum Putusan MK No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 Tentang Status Anak di Luar Nikah: Upaya Membongkar Positivisme Hukum Menuju Perlindungan HAM
Protection of human rights (human rights) in the Constitution applies in Indonesia ever prove that one of the requirements for a state law is the guarantee of human rights. Indonesia assertion of law set forth in the 1945 amendment of Article 1 paragraph (3) “State of Indonesia is the Rule of Law”. The form states have laws on the protection of human rights in implementation by the Constitutional Court (MK) in Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 on the Status of Child Marriages outside. Political decisions of law sought to protect the rights of the child, in addition to trying to dismantle the positivistic-legalistic law, which for year’s had been shackled for justice and human rights. However, in Indonesia the law of the Constitutional Court reap the political pros and cons. Therefore, it is necessary socialization broadly relevant decision of the Court, the Court of law that political action are on the correct constitution, embodying the rule of law and democratic ideals for the sake of our nationhood and nation’s dignity. Constitutional Court’s decision is a wise choice and a step forward in the field of law for the defense of children’s rights that have long shackled Article 43 of the Act. N0. 1 of 1974 on Marriage. To be effective this decision the government should immediately respond with a set of supporting regulations that can be implemented by the Ministry of Religious Affairs and Ministry of Interior
Pemilu Serentak dan Masa Depan Konsolidasi Demokrasi
The development of democracy in Indonesia is running very rapidly after the 1945 amendment. One of the developments within the frame of politics characterized by constitutional formula that provides a basic framework state that sovereignty belongs to the people and carried out in accordance with the Constitution. On the basis of the formulation of the succession of leadership in the executive and legislative branches are directly implemented as the mandate of Article 22 E of paragraph ( 2). However, in practice the constitutional arrangements in the Law Number 42 Year 2008 concerning General Pemlihan President and Vice President shows inconsistent with the statement in the constitution . As set out in Article 3 paragraph ( 5 ) states that the election of President and Vice- President held after an election DPR, DPD and DPRD. At the end of the Constitutional Court through Decision No. 14/PUU-XI/2013 stated that the selection of models is unconstitutional. Based on that assessment constitutionality of norms selection method based on the simultaneous interpretation of the constitution of both the original intent and interpretation of history. Design constitutional elections simultaneously referred born as an attempt to shift the direction of the transition towards democracy in the reinforcement system in order consolidation of democratic practice direct democracy tends opaque transactional, corrupt, manipulative, high costs and preserve power can be minimized in the practice of constitutional democracy dimention to understand and sovereignty of the people
Desain Institusional Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu (DKPP) Sebagai Peradilan Etik
Ethics basically teach and emphasize to every individual including the organizer of election to take a stand and ensure that any action taken always relying on moral values. Ethics is an important element that must be adhered to every organizer of election, because it is one of the fundamental aspects for realizing democratic elections. Therefore, to enforce the Code of Ethic organizer of election, then formed Honorary Board of Organizer of Elections (DKPP) which aims to maintain independence, integrity and credibility of the Election Commission (KPU) and the Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) that is certainly going well and correctly. DKPP is an institution designed as a court of ethics, applying an open model and applying all the principles as in a court. So, for the organizer of election found to have violated the Code of Ethics, DKPP can provide sanctions in accordance with the level of the offense, that consists of a written reprimand, dismissal meantime, and permanent dismissal. Moreover DKPP decision is final and binding
Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Penguatan Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia
The presence of articles on human rights in 1945 affirmed that Indonesia respect of human rights. In order to provide protection and guarantee of human rights, the 1945 Constitution authorizes judicial review to the Constitutional Court. Some of the verdict of the Court could be used as evidence that the Court conducted to protect and promote human rights. Constitutional Court not only act as guardian of the constitution institutions, but also as the guardian of human rights. Through its judicial review authority, the Constitutional Court appeared as law enforcement agencies that oversee the passage of state power in order not to violate of human rights