Jurnal Konstitusi
Not a member yet
576 research outputs found
Sort by
Politik legislasi Menentukan DeMokrasi (analisis Putusan no. 15/Puu-iX/2011)
Get PDFNot all juridical products are along with the society’s aspiration. There are some of the juridical products assessed as against the democracy enforcement by the society. The verdict number 15/PUU-IX/2011 given by the Constitutional Court is a kind of correction to the performance of the lawmakers (UU) if the law they produce are considered contra-democracy. Besides, the verdict of the Constitutional Court to some of the articles in the Law No. 2 Year 2011 actually might be read as a warning from the Constitutional Court to the lawmakers, especially those regulating the problem of political parties so that their performance could be maximized and transparent, and consider egalitarianism in the future
Penetapan Anggota Panwaslu oleh Bawaslu: Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 11/Puu-Viii/2010
Get PDFThe Constitutional Court of Indonesia in Decision Number 11/PUU- VIII/2010 stated that the provisions regarding the recruitment of members of the Supervisory Committee for the Election must be nominated by the Provincial/District General Elections Commission is contrary to Article 22E Paragraph (1) and paragraph (5), and Article 28D Paragraphs (1) of the 1945 Constitution. Therefore, to ensure a fair legal certainty and avoid disruption of the elections, the nomination and appointment of members of Supervisory Committee for the Election is conducted by one institution, namely the General Elections Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) or Supervisory Committee for the Election. The decision contains two legal meanings. First, the view that the principle of checks and balances are not only connected with separation of power at the legislative branch, executive branch, and judiciary branch, but also the relationship between “supervisors and the supervised” that based on the proportional rationality inter-state relations. Second, the case number 11/PUU-VIII /2010 actually contain elements of the dispute between the two state institutions, namely the General Elections Commission and Bawaslu because not only related to the interpretation of norms, but also the fate of members of 192 Supervisory Committee Election that not recognized and approved by the General Elections Commission. The problem handled by Constitutional Court using judicial review case against the 1945 Constitution
Relevansi Parliamentary Threshold terhadap Pelaksanaan Pemilu yang Demokratis
Get PDFGeneral Election as a means to realize the ideal of democracy does not merely aim to determine who will get the position in the parliament but it also should represent the sovereignty of the people. In the 2009 General Election, however, parliamentary threshold was prevailed and implemented. This regulation is included on Article 202 The General Election Act number 10/2008 which stated that political party of General Election participant must fulfil at least an amount of 2.5% of total valid national vote to be included in the representation determination of the House of Representative.A number of Indonesian peoples objected the rule. This is because parliamentary threshold deemed to be potentially demolished the political right of the people. Besides, the implementation of parliamentary threshold in bottom level considered to have some potential horizontal conflict because, for example, if someone voted as a selected candidate but they do not fulfil the parliamentary threshold, this particular candidate cannot obtain a seat in the parliament. This can be seen in the petition of judicial review to the Constitution Court regarding this parliamentary threshold regulation.It can be concluded that the relevance of parliamentary threshold to democratic General Election execution can not be separated from the mechanism and reasons in determining the the amount of threshold numbers in said rule. Requirement for determining the threshold is not merely based on a reason to strengthen presidential system chosen by the Indonesian people. In this case, the people’s voice should not be represented merely by the parliamentary number having position in the House of Representative. If this happens, then there will be some concerns of the emergence of political interest to strengthen the position of a particular political party in the parliament
Menegakkan Hak Beragama di Tengah Pluralisme
Get PDFThe verdict of the Constututional Court (MK) regarding the rejection of Law Trial Number 1/PNPS/Year 1965 about the Prevention of Religion Violation and/or desecration through Indonesia’s Law of Constitution year 1945 can be read as reinforcement through the juridical existence which is related to the right of religion freedom. Any kinds of religion desecration and violation such as a violence in the name of religion or religion radicalism which happens in Indonesia is not caused by the juridical products in the era of the old orde or because of the emergency product, but it is more caused by the compilation of problems such as unfairness, disparity, and powerlessness
Perlindungan Hak Anak terhadap Iklan Rokok yang Tidak Memperagakan Wujud Rokok
Get PDFThe decision of Constitutional-Court No. 6 /PUU – VII / 2009 (about cigarette’s Promoting Limitation) to make the promotion of cigarette more clear in action, without6 manifesting it as a legal advertisement (46 verse (3) UU. No. 32, 2002). Although the cigarette advertisement is not along with the cigarette’s appearance, it still has a huge effect for children. In this circumstance, an attractive debate will rise up between the economic orientation of the cigarette’s entrepreneur and the Children’s Right-Commission purpose. Both of them also get the protection as an expression of constitutional right6 (27 and 28 A, verse (2) UUD 1945). then over here there is an important meaning of Constitutional – Court’s decision No.6 /PUU – VII / 2009, which gives an answer of the law’s issue whether a cigarette advertisement without the appearance, it still also seize the children’s constitutional right
Dimensi Judicial Activism dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi
Get PDFA transformative amendment of the 1945 Constitution established a separate judicial institution called the Constitutional Court. This institution is believed to serve a strategic role within Indonesia’s plural legal system particularly in the area of constitutional review and constitutional rights protection. However, the performance of the Constitutional Court has attracted controversy. This controversy arises because the Court is concerned with introducing a sociological paradigm of law that embraces substantive justice with a fluid acknowledgment of procedural justice. A key criticism of the Constitutional Court is that the nature of Court decisions has developed into a practice of judicial activism. This article discusses the dimension of judicial activism used by the Constitutional Court on the grounds for protecting constitutional rights of the citizens through its decisions. It also analyses the extent of judicial activism that can be justified in the decision-making process in the Constitutonal Court
Nilai-Nilai Filosofi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Final dan Mengikat
Get PDFKehadiran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam struktur ketatanegaran Indonesia merupakan kemajuan besar, tidak saja bagi pembangunan hukum melainkan juga bagi perkembangan demokrasi Indonesia. Kehadiran Mahkamah Konstitusi segenap wewenang dan kewajibannya, dinilai telah merobahkan doktrin supremasi parlemen (parliamentary supremacy) dan menggantikankan dengan ajaran supremasi konstitusi..
Vonis Mahkamah Konstitusi Mengeksaminasi Keterwakilan Perempuan
Get PDFThe verdict imposed by the Constitutional Court in the form of revocation of some parts of General Election Rules which arrange the determination of the representative who has the rights to occupy the council seats is not a verdict which discriminates and hinders women rights to fight for occupying the council seats, but it gives them more available and egalitarian chances to female politicians. The Constitutional Court verdict also examines the political party to elect and decide the council representatives truly based on the aspect of rasionality, professionality, and any other special aspects supporting them
Hak Kebebasan Berserikat Bagi Pekerja Sebagai Hak Konstitusional
Get PDFArticle 28E paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia guarantees the right of everyone to freedom of association, assembly, and to express opinions. Thus, the right of workers or labours to freedom of association is guaranteed by the Constitution. The principle which is embedded in the 1945 Constitution has been incorporated into Law Number 21 Year 2000 concerning Labour Union. The substance of the rights to freedom of association aims to give bargaining power to workers represented by the union against employers. The bargaining position of labour unions is expected to improve the functioning of the unions to defend the interest of workers
Urgensi Perluasan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebagai Manifestasi Pengejawantahan Konstitusi
Get PDFThe acknowledgement of Indonesia as a state of Law as mandated by Article 1 paragraph (3) of 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia is the fundamental objective of the Constitution where one of its dimensions is to create and promote fair and prosperous community, in pursuing this, with the spirit of developmentalism, the state allows the participation of corporations in the development with the hope that Indonesia will be able to compete in the globalization era. However, it is apparent that their participation has adverse impact, some of them have even been involved in bribery and corruption. According to criminal law of Indonesia, briber and receiver (gratification) will be held criminally liable. The method applied in this research is juridical normative which analyzes secondary data including secondary law materials in Criminal Code and Law No. 31/1999 in conjunction with Law 20/2001 on Corruption Eradication and United States of America of Anti-bribery Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Based on the analysis conducted, it was found that Indonesia can only prosecute receiver of bribery (gratification) whilst the bribing corporation is prosecuted in the United States, it is also concluded that it is urgent to expand and amend the criminal law on responsibility for corporate crime as the manifestation of constitution in the Indonesian criminal law in order to counterbalance USA Anti-bribery Foreign Corrupt Practies Act (FCPA