Jurnal Konstitusi
Not a member yet
576 research outputs found
Sort by
Konstitusionalitas Pembatasan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi
Get PDFThis research try to disscus the Constitutional Court’s interpretation of Article 28J paragraph (2) of the constitution 1945; and the reasons used by constitutional court in declaring an human right limitation unconstitutional. This research is a normative legal research conducted on 19 decisions of constitutional court which contain unconstitutional human right limitation. This research conclude 4 reasons that cause unconstitutional human right limitation, there are; a) To violate the principle of human rights respectation; b) To contain element of discrimination; c) To violate the principle of legal certain; d) Not based on the strong, valid, rational, and proportional reason, and being exessif. Those reasons are alternative, which means that constitutional court can declare an human rights limitation on legislation as the unconstitutional norm only by one from that reasons
Relevansi Monisme dan Dualisme Bagi Pemberlakuan Perjanjian Internasional di Indonesia
Get PDFThe application of treaty is still influenced by different views on the approach chosen by Indonesia, whether monism or dualism. By using normative method, this study questions the relevance of monism-incorporation and dualism-transformation approaches in determining the application of treaty. Two key aspects will be reviewed, namely parliamentary approval and the drafting of national regulations to implement treaty. It concludes that the dichotomy of monism and dualism has various limitations, and is irrelevant for determining the application of treaty. Parliamentary approval is required for treaty application, both in monist and dualist countries. Several dualist countries have even sought parliamentary approval before ratification can take place. The formulation of national regulations is common in monist and dualist countries. Not to fulfill theoretical demands in line with the monism and dualism approaches, but to ensure harmonization and the ability of state to carry out its obligations
Urgensi Pengujian Formil di Indonesia : Pengujian Legitimasi dan Validitas
Get PDFThe review of the constitutionality of norms is a control mechanism that is carried out on the law-making procedures (procedural review) and the substance of the norm (substantive review). This is a consequence of a constitutional state and the rule of law. Cases of procedural review have often occurred in Indonesia, but the understanding and regulation is still relatively inconsistent as on substantive review. One of the reasons why this condition occurred is due to the lack of regulation regarding the procedure for the law-making process in the Constitution which is an indicator of the procedural review. Therefore, this study tries to answer the nature or urgency of the procedural review, by questioning what was tested by the Constitutional Court in the formal examination? This is doctrinal research which using a conceptual and cases approach in Indonesia, Kolombia, and South Africa. The selection of the case are carried out according to the functional comparative law method, which also considered on non-legal factors such as social and political factors that influence the norm. The results of the study found that the urgency of procedural review is to ensure that the law has fulfilled the aspects of legitimacy and validity. Legitimacy is arisen through meaningful participation, whereas validity comes from the conformity of the law-making processes with the procedures and can be proven materially, not only fulfilling formal requirements
Membangun Paradigma Hukum HAM Indonesia Berbasis Kewajiban Asasi Manusia
Get PDFHuman rights are essential things to uphold because their existence guarantees the equality of all humanity. In Indonesia, the issue of human rights is still often a problem, and one source of the problem is the imbalance between human rights and unbalanced with human rights obligation. This research was conducted with a systematic literature review approach to propose a human rights law paradigm based on human rights obligations. From the perspective of legal analysis, the nature of this research is categorized into prescriptive research. The materials in this study were sourced from laws, books, and scientific articles from national and international journals that deal with the concept of human rights and human rights law. The results of this study indicate that the enforcement of human rights must look at fulfilling human rights obligations because, in general, a person can claim rights if they have met the requirements. By basing their rights on obligations, human rights law will improve. This article is expected to be able to be one of the references in the application of human rights law in Indonesia to build justice between human rights and obligations
Integrasi Sistem Peradilan Pemilihan Umum melalui Pembentukan Mahkamah Pemilihan Umum
Get PDFElections that do not end only in counting votes, and instead have to be resolved in the judiciary, have unwittingly become a measure that can legitimize and assess the quality of democracy. This situation confirms that the existence of a judicial institution has become an important part of the sustainability of the election process. This research tries to re-evaluate the implementation process of the Election justice system in Indonesia. By using doctrinal normative legal research collaborated with the Reform Oriented Research method, this study found the problems faced in the Electoral justice system in Indonesia. These problems include the tug of war over regional head election dispute resolution, disintegration and overlapping authority for resolving general election disputes, the accumulation of Election disputes in the Constitutional Court, as well as problems regarding recall system for DPR members by political parties. In resolving these problems, this study offers an idea in the form of integrating the entire Election dispute resolution process in a Supreme Election Court. The Supreme Election Court will be positioned parallel to the Constitutional Court and Supreme Court. The Supreme Election Court has the authority to judge at the first and last levels whose decisions are final and binding to decide on violations of the code of ethics of Election administrators, violations of Election administration, election process disputes, election crimes, over results disputes and post-election dispute
Peninjauan Hukum Menurut Hukum Adat Kampar: Sumbangan dalam Mewujudkan Hukum yang Responsif
Get PDFThe development of Indonesian constitutional law, especially judicial review, is influenced by the liberal continental and Anglo-Saxon legal systems. Meanwhile, Kampar customary law already has a legal review system with the philosophy "Adat tali bapilin tigo, tigo tunggku sajoghangan" with the ultimate goal "Adat bersendi syara’, syara’ bersendi Kitabullah". This paper examines legal review under Kampar customary law, using qualitative analysis, historical approaches, and the identification of unwritten laws. The concept presented is based on the concept of reasoning for the formation of a norm system that combines three elements, namely religion, custom, and government (the Trinity). The coherence of this concept should be a new offering in the expanded power of judicial review. The review of the legal norms should extend to the level of the ethical review. The expansion can be done by adopting the concept of legal testing reasoning according to Kampar customary law according to the moral system
Constitutional Issue of the Executional Power of Fiduciary Certificates as Equal to Court Decision
Get PDFThe enactment of the Fiduciary Guarantee Law is expected to be able to answer problems in the financing business, but it causes a loss of constitutional rights because it equalizes the executorial power of a judge\u27s decision legally binding with fiduciary certificates. The analysis was carried out by Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/ PUU-XVII/2019; the was carried out by document study and analyzed prescriptively and descriptively. The results showed that the normative basis of the executive power on the fiduciary certificate was born from an agreement registered. So that it can be used as perfect evidence to prove the debtor in breach of contract, and the judge\u27s legal consideration to declare the inconsistent provisions tested are based on not the existence of legal certainty in determining the time of breach of contract (default) and the mechanism for the execution of the Fiduciary Certificat
Positive Legislature dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Mengenai Upaya Hukum Putusan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang
Get PDFConstitutional Court as negative legislature as time goes by has become positive legislature, recently Constitutional Court verdict Number 23/PUU-XIX/2021 regarding Articel 235 examination from Bankruptcy Law and Debt Payment Postponement (PKPU) toward Indonesia’s Constitution (UUD NRI 1945), considered to cause constitutional losses because it does not regulate the existence of legal remedies against the PKPU verdict. This research aims to analyze the Judges consideration (ratio decidendi) of the Constitutional Court’s verdict regarding the legal remedies of PKPU verdict in accordance with the principles of justice and legal certainty and to analyze the enforcement of the Constitutional Court verdict regarding the legal remedies for the PKPU verdict which are positive legislation. This article used normative legal research method. The results of the study show that the progressivity in constructing the legal remedies in PKPU verdict with certain conditions (Conditionally Unconstitutional). The Constitutional Court’s decision which is final and binding in its implementation is not in accordance with the theory. It should be realized that in a decision that is self-executing, it still requires bureaucratic procedures to address the decision so that it can be implemented consistently in accordance with the principle of erga omnes
Kesadaran Berkonstitusi bagi Penegak Hukum terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Upaya Menjaga Kewibawaan Peradilan
Get PDFThe decision of the Constitutional Court is a type of decision that is declaratoir constitutive. When the decision of the Constitutional Court states that the law is not binding, because it is contrary to the Constitution, then by itself the decision also creates a new legal situation. The formulation of the problem that will be answered in this research is how the concept of building constitutional awareness for law enforcement institutions to obey the decisions of the Constitutional Court. This research is a type of juridical-normative research, to conduct a search on the decisions of the Constitutional Court. Disobedience to the decision of the Constitutional Court will have fatal consequences, from the potential for a reduction in the function of the Constitutional Court institution to the occurrence of constitutional justice delays. Obedience to the decisions of the Constitutional Court cannot only rely on the legal awareness of the community and state institutions, but also needs to be supported by “coercive” instruments. Therefore, the importance of collaborative collaboration across state institutions so that the decisions of the Constitutional Court can be implemented properly as they should. In addition, it is necessary to design the imposition of sanctions for acts of disobedience to the decisions of the Constitutional Court
Menakar Transformasi Bawaslu Menjadi Lembaga Independen Peradilan Pemilukada
No full textSince Law Number 12 of 2008, there has been a change in the regulation of the institution\u27s power that settles Regional Election disputes. The Constitutional Court was given jurisdiction to decide disputes regarding Regional Election results due to this reform. By judgment number 97/PUU-XI/2013, the Constitutional Court revoked this power. In response to this judgment, the President and the House of Representatives of Republic of Indonesia issued Law No.8 of 2015, which stated that the Constitutional Court would redetermine the Regional Election results until a special election court was established. The fundamental issue addressed in this paper is the necessity of converting Bawaslu into a special election court and the form and scope of Bawaslu after it has been changed. A normative legal research technique is used in this work. The study\u27s findings show that Bawaslu actuality as a quasi-judicial entity that works as an investigator and public prosecutor in electoral crime cases supports the argument for its transition into an independent election special court.