Digital Collections @ Suffolk
Not a member yet
8574 research outputs found
Sort by
Rosenberg Institute for East Asian Studies at Suffolk University Annual Report for 2016-2017
Get PDFThese reports summarize the activities of the Rosenberg Institute during the academic year, including information related to public programming, visiting scholars, cooperation with the Asian Studies program at Suffolk College of Arts & Sciences, promotion of Suffolk\u27s Asia-related activities, community outreach, and funding. Most reports also contain photographs of scholars, staff, and events.https://dc.suffolk.edu/rireports/1006/thumbnail.jp
Effective Criminal Sentencing: Analyzing the Effectiveness of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines on Career Offenders
Get PDFSuffolk University Honors Program Newsletter, Issue 2, Winter 2017
Get PDFhttps://dc.suffolk.edu/torch/1006/thumbnail.jp
DICTA, vol.17, no.3, 2017
Get PDFDICTA is the student newspaper of Suffolk University Law School. This collection represents a small selection of the paper\u27s full print run; paper copies of the full run of issues are available at the Moakley Archive.https://dc.suffolk.edu/dicta/1007/thumbnail.jp
Criminal Law and Procedure - He Said, She Said: Grand Jury Indicts Based on Hearsay in Fourteen Year-Old Sexual Assault Case-Commonwealth v. Stevenson, 50 N.E.3D 184 (Mass. 2016)
Get PDFEmployment Law - Independent Contractor Employed by a Regulation: Sebago v. Boston Cab Dispatch, Inc., 28 N.E.3D 1139 (Mass. 2015)
Get PDFLegal Challenges for Leaving It in the Ground : Touchstone Development and Holdings
Get PDFRenewable technologies are proven as an alternative mechanism for power production and their costs are rapidly decreasing. This allows the U.S. deliberately to leave climate-changing fossil fuels in the ground. Utilities in several states are now attempting to extend the life of certain fossil-fuel generating assets and pull more fossil resources from the ground, often using federal ISO wholesale markets to try to cross-subsidize these older plants. However, law is not yet structured to accommodate a system where fossil fuel power generation remains in the ground as the nation switches to solar and wind power.While able to store fossil fuel energy that otherwise is used for electric power, there is an inability to store as electric energy the intermittent electricity produced by solar or wind power. Wind and solar power technologies both are intermittent and provide relatively unreliable electric power output for an electric grid that must have reliable supply to not collapse within a few seconds. This article showcases regulatory techniques to mitigate taking more fossil resources from the ground, comparing the economic trade-offs of this strategy. This article highlights legal aspects of how: New resources owned by independent power developers cannot legally be regulated by any state PUCs because they engage exclusively in wholesale, rather than retail, sales. The outline of “safe harbor” regulatory actions still within the state arsenal to promote new power generation technologies and leave more traditional fossil resources in the ground
Law School Rules, Regulations and policies, 2017-2018
No full texthttps://dc.suffolk.edu/suls-catalogs/1086/thumbnail.jp