SICOT-J - Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie
Not a member yet
578 research outputs found
Sort by
Robotic-assisted versus conventional hip arthroplasty: a comparative analysis of perioperative blood management and early outcomes
No full textPurpose: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty (RATHA) versus Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty (CTHA) on perioperative blood loss, blood transfusion requirements, and early clinical outcomes. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at a high-volume tertiary care center from January 2021 to January 2023. A total of 200 patients undergoing primary THA were equally divided into RATHA (using the MAKO SmartRobotics system) and CTHA cohorts. Propensity score matching adjusted for demographics and baseline characteristics, resulting in 172 matched patients. Primary outcomes included changes in perioperative hemoglobin, estimated blood loss (EBL), and transfusion rates. Secondary outcomes assessed were operative time, length of stay, and transfusion-related adverse events. Results: The RATHA group demonstrated significantly lower post-operative hemoglobin drops (2.49 ± 0.6 g/dL vs. 3.38 ± 1.0 g/dL; p < 0.001), reduced EBL on post-operative day 3 (1125.52 ± 361.2 mL vs. 1611.12 ± 501.4 mL; p < 0.0001), and lower transfusion rates (7.96% vs. 20.4%; p = 0.0175) compared to the CTHA group. Operative time was significantly shorter in the RATHA group (68.01 ± 8.7 minutes vs. 77.1 ± 10.5 minutes; p < 0.0001). All robotic cohort patients were discharged within 3 days, whereas 14% of CTHA patients required extended hospitalization. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (RATHA) significantly reduces perioperative blood loss, hemoglobin drop, and blood transfusion rates compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty (CTHA). The observed decrease in operative time and hospital stay in the RATHA group further suggests that robotic assistance may enhance procedural efficiency and support faster patient recovery
Outcomes of a hydroxyapatite ceramic-coated femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty: a report of excellent survivorship from a single United Kingdom centre
No full textBackground: Hydroxyapatite (HA) coated femoral stems were introduced to enhance the biological fixation at the implant-bone interface, aiming to increase the longevity and survival of the prostheses. We aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of an HA ceramic (HAC) coated stem in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), assess the stem survival, and clinically evaluate the patients using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and radiological evaluation of stem osseointegration. Patients and methods: This was a prospective evaluation of a retrospective cohort of 385 patients (442 hips) who underwent primary THA between June 2008 and December 2018. The mean age was 63.83 years (range, 30–82 years). During the follow-up duration, 23 patients died, and 36 patients (38 hips) were lost to follow-up. Prospective data collected for 326 patients (381 hips) was used to evaluate stem survival with the Kaplan–Meier method using aseptic loosening or any revision as the endpoint. Clinical evaluation was done using the EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D) scoring system and PROMs using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Merle D’Aubigne Postel (MDP) score. Radiological assessments were performed using the Engh radiological criteria for stem osteointegration. Results: The mean follow-up duration was 9.39 years (range, 4–14.5 years). The survival of the HAC-coated femoral stem was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.7–100%) at 14 years with aseptic loosening as the endpoint, and 98.9% (CI, 96.7–100%) at 14 years with stem revision for any reason as the endpoint. The mean OHS was 44.5 (range, 30–48), and the mean MDP score was 15.87 (range, 10–18). Radiological evaluations showed full osseointegration of all stems. Conclusion: This HAC-coated femoral stem has shown excellent survivorship, functional outcomes, and full osseointegration at the final follow-up
Piriformis preserving posterior approach STAR for primary and primary complex total hip arthroplasty: Excellent safety and efficacy in a single blinded prospective single surgeon cohort of 522 patients with a mean follow-up of 2 years
No full textIntroduction: STAR (Superior Transverse Anatomic Reconstruction), a piriformis-preserving posterior approach, has not been extensively studied. Our study aimed to assess the STAR approach’s safety and efficacy by recording postoperative complication rates and measuring implantation accuracy in a single surgeon prospective cohort with a mean follow-up of two years. Methods: The study involved 522 patients with elective primary or complex primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed by a senior surgeon using the STAR approach between 2019 and 2023. 63.6% of the patients were female. The mean patients’ age was 65.6 years. 19.5% of the procedures were primary complex THAs. The mean follow-up and length of stay were 2.13 years and 1.50 days. The ratio of uncemented to hybrid and standard to dual mobility liner THAs were 3:2 and 4:1. Fifty-eight patients received blood transfusions. All patients followed the same postoperative protocol. Two physicians not involved in surgery collected clinical and radiological data. Efficacy was defined as measuring the cup inclination and anteversion, stem alignment, and leg length discrepancy (LLD) using the one-month postoperative standardised supine anteroposterior pelvic X-rays. The postoperative complication rate, including dislocation and infection, defined safety. Results: The mean cup inclination and anteversion were 42.80 (±4.9) and 19.90 (±8.9), respectively. 97.5% of the stems were placed in neutral and 2.5% in varus position. The mean LLD was 3.3 ± 6.3 mm. A single deep infection was managed with two-stage revision with no recurrence, and an early traumatic dislocation in an 80-year-old woman was managed successfully with closed reduction and hip spica. Three superficial wound infections were treated with oral antibiotics. Discussion: The STAR approach is safe and has demonstrated excellent early-to-mid-term efficacy profile outcomes. The unobstructed acetabular and femoral intraoperative view facilitated optimal implant positioning and contributed to excellent dislocation outcomes in combination with piriformis preservation
Erratum to: “What is the best fixation method in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction? A biomechanical comparison of common methods for femoral graft attachment”
No full textFlexion contracture can cause component mismatch in the Prophecy
No full textIntroduction: Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) systems are used to conduct total knee arthroplasty. PSI reduces operative time, is less invasive and easier to use, and minimizes the risk of errors by providing precise measurements and reducing operating room turnover time. However, a study on the accuracy of Prophecy Evolution PSI (Microport Inc., Arlington, TN, USA) reported that 94% were below the error margin of 1.5 mm and 90% had error margins of 1 mm. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the Prophecy Evolution PSI system in terms of the thickness of “total” bony resection required to achieve adequate extension/flexion gaps and the component match ratio between preoperative planning and actual component size inserted. Methods: Comparisons were made between the sizes of femoral and tibial components planned with PSI and those inserted. The primary outcome was the average preoperative range of motion with and without matched femoral/tibial components. The study further analyzed the proportions of cases in which both the femoral and tibial components matched, neither matched, and only one of the femoral or tibial components matched. Results: The ratio of the same sizes between the PSI planning and those inserted was 50.8% (33 patients) for both the femoral and tibial components. For the femoral component alone, the ratio was 84.6% (55 patients), and for the tibial component, it was 58.4% (38 patients). A receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that flexion contracture greater than 20° was a significant prognostic factor for the PSI component match group versus the mismatch group. Discussion: Flexion contracture may cause PSI mismatch. Notably, flexion contracture greater than 20° was a significant risk factor for the PSI component match group versus the mismatch group. During preoperative planning for a patient with flexion contracture, surgeons should prepare for the possibility of inserting an undersized tibial component
Erratum to: “Peer-reviewed publications in orthopaedic surgery from lower income countries: A comparative analysis”
No full textPoint of care testing for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections: a review
No full textBackground: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a major complication following total joint arthroplasties (TJA), significantly affecting patient outcomes and healthcare costs. Despite advances in diagnostic techniques, challenges persist in accurately diagnosing PJI, underscoring the need for effective point-of-care testing (POCT). Methods: This review examines the current literature and latest developments in POCT for diagnosing PJI, focusing on biomarkers such as alpha-defensin, leukocyte esterase, calprotectin, and C-reactive protein (CRP). Criteria from various societies like the Musculoskeletal Infection Society, Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the International Consensus Meeting were compared to evaluate the effectiveness of these biomarkers in a point-of-care setting. Results: POCT provides rapid results essential for the timely management of PJI, with alpha-defensin and leukocyte esterase showing high specificity and sensitivity. Recent advancements have introduced novel biomarkers like calprotectin, which demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy. However, challenges such as the variability in test performance and the need for validation under different clinical scenarios remain. Discussion: While POCT for PJI shows promising results, their integration into clinical practice requires standardized protocols and further validation. The evolution of these diagnostic tools offers a potential shift toward more personalized and immediate care, potentially improving outcomes for patients undergoing TJA
How would you like your proximal femoral nail – with a monocortical recon plate, with cable, or neat? A functional and radiological study of reverse oblique (AO/OTA 31-A3) intertrochanteric femur fractures
No full textObjective: Intertrochanteric femur fractures (ITFF), more so reverse oblique fractures (AO/OTA 31-A3), are the most challenging clinically, with significant morbidity and mortality. Early stable fixation should be achieved to allow early mobilization and reduce complications. This study evaluates the functional and radiological outcomes of three Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) techniques – PFN alone, Cable + PFN, and Monocortical reconstruction plate (MRP) + PFN– in managing reverse oblique ITFF, to determine the most ideal of them. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 106 patients treated from 2015 to 2022. The patients were classified by the surgical intervention: Cable + PFN (n = 37), MRP + PFN (n = 29), and PFN (n = 40). The critical parameters analyzed included healing time, quality of reduction, rates of complications, and functional outcomes of Trendelenburg gait. Results: The bone healing time was significantly faster in the Cable + PFN group and MRP + PFN group as compared to the PFN group, 4.43 ± 0.92 and 4.44 ± 0.90 months versus 6.40 ± 2.41 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Compared with the PFN group, the number of cases with Trendelenburg gait in the Cable + PFN group was significantly lower, 10.8%. The number of patients showing the Trendelenburg gait trended lower in the MRP + PFN group but was insignificant (p = 0.075). Radiological outcomes did not differ significantly among the groups. Conclusion: The use of Cable + PFN and MRP + PFN techniques has superior outcomes with earlier bone union and far less incidence of Trendelenburg gait than PFN alone. These findings can help hint that perhaps the usage of cables and recon plates enhances the stability and functional restoration in patients who have sustained reverse oblique ITFF.
Level of evidence: II
Adapting hip arthroplasty practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Assessing the impact of outpatient care sudden increase on early complications and clinical outcomes
No full textIntroduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected access to timely care for patients with hip osteoarthritis requiring total hip replacement (THR). This study aimed to assess the changes in surgical activity, outpatient treatment, length of stay (LOS), discharge destinations, readmission rates, clinical outcomes, and patient satisfaction before and after the pandemic at our institution. Materials and methods: This retrospective study encompassed patients undergoing primary THR through the direct anterior approach at a single university hospital. Data on demographic characteristics, surgical technique, perioperative management, LOS, discharge destinations, complications, and clinical outcomes were collected. Furthermore, a comparative analysis between the pre-pandemic (2019) and post-pandemic (2022) periods was conducted. Results: There was a 14% increase in surgical activity post-pandemic, with 214 patients undergoing surgery in 2019 versus 284 in 2022. The percentage of patients managed as outpatients significantly increased from 0.5% in 2019 to 29.6% in 2022 (p < 0.001). LOS decreased from 2.7 ± 1 [0–8] days to 1.4 ± 1.1 [0–12] days (p < 0.001), and the rate of discharge to rehabilitation centres declined from 21.5% to 8.8% (p < 0.001). No significant increase in the readmission rates was observed (1.4% in both periods). At two months postoperatively, the mean HHS and satisfaction rates were comparable between the two groups (p = 1 and p = 0.73, respectively). Discussion: Despite the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, surgical activity at our institution demonstrated an increase compared to the pre-pandemic levels by expanding outpatient care, reducing LOS, and increasing rates of home discharges. Importantly, these changes did not adversely affect rehospitalization rates or early clinical outcomes.
Level of evidence: I
Outcomes of total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility cups following failed internal fixation of proximal femoral fractures at a mean follow-up of 6 years
No full textIntroduction: Performing total hip arthroplasty (THA) after failed internal fixation of proximal femoral fractures (PFF) is known to be associated with high rates of complications. Dual mobility cups (DMC) are known to lower dislocation events in high-risk patients. Very few reports investigated the outcomes of THA using DMC following failure of internal fixation for PFF. Methods: This is a retrospective monocentric continuous study of 31 patients who underwent THA with DMC after failed internal fixation of PFF. The clinical assessment was based on the modified Harris hip score (mHHS) at the last follow-up. The complication rates and radiological analyses were recorded. Results: The mean follow-up period was 5.96 ± 4.2 years. At the last follow-up, the mean mHHS was 92.9 ± 9.1 with 71% of the patients describing their operated hip as a forgotten hip. No dislocation or aseptic loosening events were noted. One patient developed a septic loosening of the implant. No significant radiological changes were recorded. Sixteen stems (51.6%) were placed in a neutral position, 13 (42%) in valgus (2.74 ± 1.72°), and 2 (6.4%) in varus (6.94 ± 2.02°). Conclusion: This study emphasizes the advantage of using DMC following failed internal fixation of PFF in reducing dislocation and complication events in this high-risk population