Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences
PIK PublicationsNot a member yet
55339 research outputs found
Sort by
The undoing effect in athletes - examining psychological short-term interventions to induce positive emotions and improve psychophysiological recovery
Athletes are faced with a wide range of physiological demands and mental requirements during training and competition (Lautenbach et al., 2022; Le Meur et al., 2010; Nédélec et al., 2012), which often emerge within a short period of time. Helping athletes to get more effectively into a phase of regeneration could be a performance-relevant advantage for them (Kellmann & Beckmann, 2018) and at the same time have favorable long-term effects for their health and well-being (Kellmann & Beckmann, 2018; Kellmann et al., 2018). Thus, it is essential to develop and empirical evaluate applicable short-term interventions (Loch et al., 2019). One framework within which those interventions can be examined is the undoing-hypothesis from Fredrickson and Levenson (1998). This hypothesis states that positive emotions undo the psychological and physiological effects of “negative” emotions. And consequently predicts that experiencing positive emotions (e.g., joy, amusement, contentment) speed up cardiovascular (Boehm & Kubzansky, 2012; Brummett et al., 2009) and psychological recovery (Gilbert et al., 2016; Radstaak et al., 2014; Sokhadze et al., 2007). The aim of the present study will be to investigate six different (sport) psychological interventions (breathing techniques, music, strengths, imagery of prior success, imagery of a positive moment, reasons for the sport) on psychophysiological recovery through the lens of the undoing-hypothesis
Contingencies of Self-Worth & Virtues Replication
Replication of previous study using person-centered approach to examine how domains of contingent self-worth form latent profiles, and how profile membership relates to well-being and moral outcomes
Central Nervous System Functional Changes Associated with Pain During Colour Perception: A Scoping Review
This scoping review explores functional changes in the central nervous system that occur during the experience of pain while observing colours, either in isolation or within the context of images.
This protocol was drafted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR)
Rhetorical Effectiveness of Insinuations - Experiment 3 (Perceived trustworthiness)
The ad hominem fallacy (henceforth, AH) "occurs when one party in a discussion criticises or attempts to refute the other party's argument by directly attacking that second party personally" (Walton, 1998, p. 2). This definition of AH is close to Bell (1997)'s definition of innuendoes (and by extension insinuations) with the difference that the latter is a negative ascription that must be implicitly conveyed without necessarily being part of an argumentative structure.
In line with the literature on the subject, the implicitness of insinuations offers many rhetorical advantages over asserted personal attacks: (i) as the attack is not explicitly stated, it must be inferred by the hearers and the insinuators can deny that interpretation, (ii) the implicitness of a personal attack may allow the speaker to be perceived as less malevolent or dishonest, and (iii) since implicit meaning is less likely to be critically questioned than explicit meaning, a fallacious argument implicitly conveyed is less likely to be spotted.
This is the fourth in a series of experiments investigating this difference in rhetorical effectiveness between asserted and insinuated AH. These experiments will consist of dialogues between two characters: the first one presenting a fact, a value or a policy proposal, and the second one answering that he or she is wrong by justifying his or her disagreement either by an asserted (i.e., explicit) AH, its insinuated (i.e., implicit) counterpart, or a neutral argument without personal attack.
This fourth experiment will investigate to what extent participants find the second character to be a person of ability, benevolence, and integrity (characteristics in line with the Model of Organisational Trust of Mayer et al., 1995), whether the second character's argument is an assertive attack, an insinuated attack or a neutral (i.e., free of personal attack) argument.
In contrast to the second and third experiments and line with the first, the questions of ability, benevolence, and integrity, are specific to one of the rhetorical facets, namely 'ethos' (i.e., the perceived image of the speaker)
Understanding Discrimination Towards Persons Experiencing Homelessness: A Scoping Review Protocol
Introduction: Given the increasing rates of homelessness in recent years, there is an urgent need to address the ongoing discrimination and societal disinterest in preventing, reducing, and ending homelessness. There is no systematic review of experiences of stigma and discrimination among persons experiencing homelessness or interventions to combat this discrimination. The objective for the proposed study is to identify ways in which persons experiencing homelessness have been stigmatized and discriminated against, the results of these experiences, and interventions to reduce stigma and discrimination towards persons experiencing homelessness.
Methods and analysis: We are conducting a scoping review with guidance from the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. From July 15-19, 2022, we searched the following databases from our institutional licensed years of coverage: Medline, Embase, CINAHL Complete, Academic Search Ultimate, APA PsycINFO, Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index, Arts & Humanities Citation Index, Emerging Sources Citation Index, Left, PAIS International, PILOTS, Psychology & Behavioral Sciences Collection, Sociological Abstracts, and Dissertations and Theses Global. Two independent reviewers are screening study titles/abstracts and will independently screen the full-texts. Study inclusion criteria includes any study type reporting primary findings of English-language research on non-refugee persons experiencing homelessness in any type of setting or service worldwide. Three reviewers will then chart data of our included studies. Data will be extracted and organized into categories and sub-themes in tabular form. To understand the validity of the scoping review findings in the local context and to gather additional perspectives on the topic, we will conduct an ‘expert consultation’ workshop.
Ethics and dissemination: This study has ethics approval from the University of Utah Institutional Review Board. Review findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal and at conferences. We plan to preregister this protocol with Open Science Framework
Threat Ownership Theory (TOT): Towards a greater understanding of the dynamic link between threat and political attitudes
This is an addendum to the previous pre-registration, which modifies the sample size requirement for submission to the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Psikologi Islam(i) di Indonesia: Sebuah Analisis Bibliometric
Penelitian ini bertujuan menjawab beberapa pertanyaan terkait jumlah pertumbuhan publikasi Psikologi Islam(i) di Indonesia, Jumlah kontribusi penulis, Topik penelitian Psikologi Islam(i) apa saja yang telah dikaji dan bagaimana perkembangannya? Literatur apa yang paling berpengaruh terhadap perkembangan psikologi Islam(i) di Indonesia? dan pada ranah publikasi seperti apa topik-topik dalam Psikologi Islam(i) dimuat
Experiences of crisis care among service users with Complex Emotional Needs and other stakeholders: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of the qualitative literature
A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis of the literature exploring experience of crisis care among service users with Complex Emotional needs or a diagnosis of "personality disorder
Cross-registration and results availability of trials registered on the EUCTR
This study will examine the EUCTR as a repository for trial results compared to other routes of results dissemination. By comparing EUCTR registrations to the published literature, and other major registries, we can better understand whether it contains unique results compared to the broader literature and what results could be made available on the registry that currently have not been shared, in violation of EU guidelines