bepress Legal Repository
Not a member yet
645042 research outputs found
Sort by
Can LLM Chatbots Provide Effective Legal Advice? An Analysis of Current Capabilities and Limitations
No full textThis post explores the current capabilities and limitations of LLM chatbots in the legal domain. It is the first in a blog series titled ‘GenAI and Consumer Law’, which draws on insights from an ongoing research project that explores the potential of large language models (LLMs) in enhancing India’s consumer grievance redressal system
Private Equity Investment in Health Care and Ineffective Antitrust Regulations
No full textThe corporatization of health care in the United States has forced us to confront society’s moral expectations of the industry, which serves uniquely vulnerable consumers. Health care has become increasingly more lucrative, attracting private equity (“PE”) investment, specifically in private physicians’ practices. Physicians find PE transactions appealing because physicians have difficulty competing with large hospital systems and complying with expansive regulatory requirements. The attention given by PE to health care has raised concerns regarding the tension between the expected priorities of PE firms and health care. Additionally, the nature of PE investments through roll-ups of smaller companies has regulators worried that they cannot control PE’s involvement in the industry. The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) is one regulatory agency that has explicitly addressed PE investments through revisions to its Merger Guidelines to ensure PE does not slip through its grasp.
As PE roll-ups are a type of health care consolidation, this Comment will compare the FTC’s past efforts to regulate hospital mergers with its potential future efforts to regulate PE investment in health care under the 2023 Merger Guidelines. The Comment also states how the 2023 Merger Guidelines still fall short of effectively regulating PE investment in health care and how healthcare-specific guidelines could improve their effectiveness. It additionally argues that it may be best to let PE investment continue until the market self-corrects. The Comment provides supplementary methods to undermine the attractiveness of PE investment for physicians, which would decrease the frequency of these transactions and speed up the economic self-correcting process. The various paths forward further support the Comments overarching argument that, as it currently stands, the FTC’s antitrust laws are not effective in regulating PE investment in health care
Child Custody Drama Then and Now: AFCC Takes on Kramer v. Kramer (1979) and Marriage Story (2019)
No full textThe Price of Criminal Law
No full textShould tax dollars pay for more criminal law, better public schools, or a new community center? Different counties will answer the question differently, but facing these tradeoffs is profoundly important to democratic governance. Nonetheless, because the criminal legal system diffuses power and hides and offioads costs, officials and voters do not have to honestly consider that question. These structural features place a hidden thumb on the scale that gives counties more criminal enforcement than they pay for. That is a problem. Too much enforcement is particularly pernicious in criminal law: Incarceration inflicts tremendous suffering, especially in poor communities of color. Suburban voters who do not live in or look like residents of overpoliced communities have no incentive to account for others\u27 suffering. But if their tax dollars had to pay for the entire criminal law apparatus in their community, their financial stake might urge restraint.
Accountability poses a central challenge in criminal law. Because power and funding are diffuse no one knows who to blame. This Article argues that budget constraints provide an important accountability measure for criminal law and that counties should be empowered to make-and be burdened with making-the hard choices. It then articulates the goals to which a democratically accountable budget in criminal law should strive. Such a budget would require government officials to be transparent in setting priorities and respect basic rights such as the right to counsel, the right against being caged in dangerous conditions, and the right to a speedy trial. To protect these rights and respect budgetary balance, budget allocations for indigent defense, carceral facilities, and courts should limit the number of cases prosecutors can bring. Ultimately, this Article aims toward a system in which criminal law is used only to the extent that a local community views its benefits as greater than the suffering it inflicts. It is animated by the instinct that some communities would spend differently if they saw the full financial costs of criminal law
The EU Geo-Blocking Regulation: A Commentary
No full textProfessor Trimble delivered a presentation for the Centre for Legal Innovation and Digital Society at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. This was an invitation to present Professor Trimble\u27s book The EU Geo-Blocking Regulation: A Commentary (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024) at the university\u27s 16th Law & Digital Society Book Talk
Dayani v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Ct., 2024 Nev. Adv. Op. 50 (Aug. 22, 2024)
No full textThe court held that a challenge under NRS 172.145(2) should be brought through a motion and not a pre-trial habeas corpus petition. Using methods of statutory interpretation, the court found that for issues involving a grand jury, a party should only use pre-trial habeas petitions to challenge insufficiency of the evidence to reach a grand jury indictment. Any other challenges require a motion. A challenge under NRS. 172.145(2), as in this case, claims that the prosecutor did not provide all exculpatory evidence to a grand jury as required. This does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence, but instead makes a claim as to the fairness of the grand jury proceedings. Therefore, challenges under NRS 172.145(2) should come to the court through a motion