Journal of EAHIL
Not a member yet
496 research outputs found
Sort by
Health literacy, its importance for citizens and patients and the involvement of medical librarians: a European initiative
Recent initiatives of the European Parliament highlight the importance of advancing health literacy in all member states. The project “Health literacy and health education fostering participation and improving women’s and men’s health” was developed in the framework of a Grundtvig Learning Partnership – Lifelong Learning Program, funded by the European Commission. Health literacy and health education empower patients and citizens to participate to the full in their health care and to communicate on eye level with their health professionals, making it possible to overcome disparities in health due to social causes. Librarians and information specialists are in a position to play a key role in searching, validating and disseminating health information for the general public
Take a look! [collected during March to Apri 2015]
The goal of this section is to have a look at references from non-medical librarian journals, butinteresting for medical librarians (for lists and TOC\u27s alerts from medical librarian journals, see:http://www.chu-rouen.fr/documed/eahil67.html). Acknowledgement to Informed Librarian Onlin
Publications and new products
There is no doubt, tough times such the ones libraries are living, need some efforts and positive thoughts. So, why not start with some good news and inspire new projects? Enjoy the read
An overview of the role of librarians in systematic reviews: from expert search to project manager
This article will cover the content provided in two workshops offered at the EAHIL+ICAHIS+ICLC 2015 in Edinburgh, Scotland: Introduction to systematic reviews and the role of the librarian and Project and data management in systematic reviews.Throughout the process of conducting the review, a librarians role can vary from a search expert to project leader depending on the needs of the researchers. This paper will cover all of the steps of the review, describing potential roles for librarians, as well as project and/or data management issues to consider. In addition, negotiating authorship and defining a systematic review service will be discussed
Report from the International Conference of Animal Health Information Specialists ICAHIS Satellite Day
The International Concerence of Animal Health Information Specialists (ICAHIS) held a Satellite meeting ahead of the joint EAHIL+ICAHIS+ICLC Workshop in June 2015. This brief report summarises the day and gives a synopsis of the presentation given by the invited speaker
TAKE A LOOK! [Collected during May to June 2015]
The goal of this section is to have a look at references from non-medical librarian journals, butinteresting for medical librarians (for lists and TOC’s alerts from medical librarian journals, see:http://www.chu-rouen.fr/documed/eahil67.html). Acknowledgement to Informed Librarian Onlin
Library impact, value and marketing: how do they fit together?
This article explores where marketing fits with the process of identifying and capturing the impact of libraries and demonstrating library value. It considers whether having a clear concept of marketing is useful in practice. Drawing on Value and Impact work in healthcare libraries it concludes that adopting marketing as a strategic management process may help make work capturing impact and demonstrating value become mainstream
Evidence-based decision making when refurnishing a medical library: a shorter way to better decisions?
The question how to use the remaining open space after removing unused shelving gave us the idea to run an evidence-based library project at the Medicine and Dentistry Library at the University in Bergen. The transition from print to electronic literature has resulted in great physical changes in our library. Unnecessary bookshelves had to be removed and we had to decide what to do with the empty space in the library. We used evidence-based practice as a method for better decision making. The different steps during the project were: finding evidence from the literature, gathering information on user needs and preferences, involving our colleagues before making decisions. The results of the project were quite satisfying. Working evidence-based contributed positively to the decision making process, and we have proven that we can work evidence-based within a short time frame