Journal of EAHIL
Not a member yet
496 research outputs found
Sort by
Open access week 2021 at the University of Eastern Finland Library: How we designed, marketed, and conducted workshop, Cafés, prizes, and postings
Full text linkInternational Open Access Week is a global event that many institutions and organisations take part in annually. Often the libraries of academic institutions are eager to participate. The level of participation can vary from simply sharing knowledge about the week to, for example, organising events. In 2021, the University of Eastern Finland library decided to put more effort to the week than before, since it has a role as an active promoter of open science.
Medical Subject Headings: Anniversaries and Special Events; Awards and Prizes; Blogging; Libraries; Open Access Publishin
Sharing COVID-19 experiences of health information and library professionals: an EAHIL interactive workshop
Full text link
Report from the EAHIL Special Interest Group (SIG) for the Training, Education and Development of Medical Information Specialists and Librarians (TrEDMIL)
Full text link
Turning student assignments into publications: Benefits for librarians and students
Full text linkThis article describes librarian involvement in a graduate student assignment to conduct rapid scoping reviews. Students had the option to submit a manuscript for publication. The librarian role through assignment conception to publication is detailed. The benefits for both students and the librarian are discussed
Development and validation of a database filter for study size: preliminary results
Full text linkResearchers performing systematic reviews often express the desire to limit the search results to a certain study size. The aim of our study was to develop a filter in embase.com and Ovid to retrieve references above a specified threshold of study size. The filter that was developed consists mainly of truncated numbers in proximity with words such as patients, cases, adults, females and phrases like "n=". Preliminary results showed that the sensitivity of the filter, as evaluated on existing systematic reviews, was at least 94%. The burden of screening for systematic reviews can be greatly reduced with the study size filter