Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI) Digital Archive
Not a member yet
1356 research outputs found
Sort by
A review of PFAS fingerprints in fish from Norwegian freshwater bodies subject to different source inputs
The extensive use of per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) has resulted in many environmental point and diffuse sources. Identifying the source responsible for a pollution hot spot is vital for assessing remediation measures, however, as there are many possible sources of environmental PFAS pollution, this can be challenging. Chemical fingerprinting has been proposed as an approach to identify contamination sources. Here, concentrations and profiles (relative distribution profiles) of routinely targeted PFAS in freshwater fish from eight sites in Norway, representing three different sources: (1) production of paper products, (2) the use of aqueous film forming foams (AFFF), and (3) long-range atmospheric transport, were investigated. The data were retrieved from published studies. Results showed that fingerprinting of PFAS in fish can be used to identify the dominant exposure source(s), and the profiles associated with the different sources were described in detail. Based on the results, the liver was concluded to be better suited for source tracking compared to muscle. PFAS fingerprints originating from AFFF were dominated by perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and other perfluoroalkanesulfonic acids (PFSA). Fingerprints originating from both long-range atmospheric transport and production of paper products were associated with high percentages of long chained perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (PFCA). However, there were differences between the two latter sources with respect to the ∑PFAS concentrations and ratios of specific PFCA pairs (PFUnDA/PFDA and PFTrDA/PFDoDA). Low ∑PFAS concentrations were detected in fish exposed mainly to PFAS via long-range atmospheric transport. In contrast, ∑PFAS concentrations were high and high percentages of PFOS were detected in fish exposed to pollution from production of paper products. The source-specific fingerprints described here can be used for source tracking.publishedVersio
Assessing and managing environmental hazards of polymers: historical development, science advances and policy options
publishedVersio
Occurrence and sorption behaviour of bisphenols and benzophenone UV-filters in e-waste plastic and vehicle fluff
publishedVersio
Effect of overburden spatial variability on field-scale geomechanical modeling of potential CO2 storage site Smeaheia, offshore Norway
publishedVersio
Permafrost Thermal Dynamics and Cryostratigraphy at Villum Research Station, Station Nord, Eastern North Greenland (81°N)
We provide the northernmost permafrost thermal analysis in Greenland through the ground temperature time series (2014–2021) and cryostratigraphy of two 20-m deep boreholes (SN1 and SN2) at Villum Research Station, Station Nord (81°N). Three sedimentary units are identified in the stratigraphy: glacial, glaciomarine, and beach deposits. These sandy and gravelly deposits are interpreted to comprise a deglaciation and isostatic emergence sequence. Ice-poor epigenetic permafrost grew downwards into the deposits following subaerial exposure. Relatively high salinity values (up to 70 ppt) are observed in the glaciomarine unit, resulting in freezing point depressions between 0 and −4°C. The Prinsesse Ingeborg Halvø study area has a polar tundra climate and is unique compared to other high Arctic areas because of a thick (>1 m), long-lasting snow cover. This snow cover results in relatively high permafrost temperatures for the climate and latitude and the warmest known permafrost north of 80°N. Over the seven-year study period, average 20 m permafrost temperature was −7.87°C at SN1 and −7.06°C at SN2. The warming rate at 20 m depth was 0.07°C/year at SN1 and 0.05°C/year at SN2, rates which are similar to those of other high Arctic sites. Active layer thickness, extrapolated from the temperature measurements, varied between 0.5 and 1.16 m. The interplay between snow dynamics and seasonal air temperature controls ground thermal regime in the study area. Air temperatures during autumn and midwinter, the fastest warming seasons, influence the ground thermal regime through the gradually developing, dense snowpack.publishedVersio
Characterization of Upper Jurassic Organic-Rich Caprock Shales in the Norwegian Continental Shelf
publishedVersio
Assessing the Benthic Response to Climate-Driven Methane Hydrate Destabilisation: State of the Art and Future Modelling Perspectives
publishedVersio