ERNEST (Toyo Bunko E-Resource Network Storage) / 東洋文庫リポジトリ
Not a member yet
7151 research outputs found
Sort by
Chapter 6. Pribumi-Arab Relations in the Indies AI-Islam Congresses: Division and Integration in the Indonesian Islamic Movement
Get PDFboo
Chapter 8. The Development of Indonesian Nationalism and Controversies over the Issue of “Mixed Marriages” in the Twentieth-Century Dutch East Indies
Get PDFboo
ʻAṣabīya bil-Walā’: An Analysis of Non-Kin Relationships in Ibn Khaldūn’s Dynastic Theory
Get PDFIn this article, the author reappraises the significance of non-kin ties according to ‘ilm al-‘umrān al-basharī (the science of human civilization), advocated by Arab historian Ibn Khaldūn in the Muqaddima, an introduction and volume I of his historical work, the Kitāb al-‘Ibar. Ibn Khaldūn’s dynastic theory, which constitutes the substance of his science of human civilization, has been regarded as a product of his political experience in Maghrib society, giving him insights into its organization, and is considered to be “tribal” in character. However, after reading through Ibn Khaldūn’s historical narrative, the author has found that the phenomenon of a transition from kin to non-kin ties in dominant groups is also laid out as a critical dynastic phenomenon, bringing into doubt the conventional interpretation that the theory is no more than “tribal.”
Thus the author examines Ibn Khaldūn’s Kitāb al-‘Ibar, focusing on a kind of his notions of social ties, ‘aṣabīya bil-walā’ (solidarity based on clientage), in order to clarify the function of non-kin ties in his dynastic theory and historical narrative. Chapter I outlines Ibn Khaldūn’s historical narrative up to the Abbasid era according to his historical perspective. Chapter II examines Ibn Khaldūn’s method of applying his own dynastic theory to the Mamluk sultanate, which has been considered not to conform to his “tribal” dynastic theory because its dominant group, mamluks, are intrinsically non-kin and non-tribal.
In conclusion, the author argues that while Ibn Khaldūn’s dynastic theory emphasizes the significance of kin and tribal ties as applied to historical dynasties in general, his historical narrative reflects the principles of transitions from kin and tribal to non-kin, which takes place in the character of social relationships in dominant groups.journal articl
