University of Dallas

UDSpace University of Dallas
Not a member yet
    2001 research outputs found

    Fiesta Ceremony Altar

    No full text
    Unknown date. Photography collection is owned by the University of Dallas. Requests for usage of copyrighted materials should be submitted to [email protected]

    Dostoevsky and the Disease of Rationalism

    No full text

    Latin Mass Easter Vestments

    No full text
    Unknown date. Photography collection is owned by the University of Dallas. Requests for usage of copyrighted materials should be submitted to [email protected]

    2014 Groundhog Sweatshirt Back

    No full text
    Digital photograph with the back of the 2014 Groundhog Sweatshirt. Unknown creator

    Myth as Transformation of Conflict

    No full text
    A question that educators must consider is what and how much should be taught--the minimum needed? or the maximum time will allow? Do we pace our teaching to the slow student or to the brightest? The question "Can we be excellent and equal, too?" has vexed educators since universal education became feasible--a century or so ago. The question is an oxymoron on the face of it--a self-contradiction: one cannot both excel others and be equal to them. Logic compels us to educate for one or the other--if we grant that excellence requires education and democracy requires equality. Of course, there are many stratagems for dodging the question: tracking, magnet schools, talented and gifted programs, "choice"--all devices of stratification aimed at excellence at the expense of equality--that is, of democracy. But the problem is not peculiarly modern; it has been present to challenge educators apparently from the beginning of history. For the question it poses is at the heart of the mortal enterprise: is the human purpose served best by protecting truth from unworthy hands or by throwing it open to all who come? It is unlikely that we shall find a suitable solution to this age-long dilemma in our deliberations during the next few days, but we may be able to cast it in a different light. And, as one might suppose from this morning's lecture, that light is one of myth

    1986 Commencement Program

    No full text

    Good Friday with Cardinal Farrell

    No full text
    Unknown date. Photography collection is owned by the University of Dallas. Requests for usage of copyrighted materials should be submitted to [email protected]

    2006 Commencement Program

    No full text

    Mater Dei Requiem Mass

    No full text
    Unknown date. Photography collection is owned by the University of Dallas. Requests for usage of copyrighted materials should be submitted to [email protected]

    Dostoevsky lecture for IPS

    No full text
    Dostoevsky was the first writer to discover that the novel could be an instrument of discoveryâ even a kind of prophecy. This is to say that he discovered the novel as a mode of poetryâ and in a poem, form and content cannot be separated: the way in which something is said is as much constitutive of the meaning as is the content. Dostoevsky once wrote that for the novelist, the germ, the insight, came firstâ and one might call that the poem. Then there was the work of constructing the work of art itself, which one might call the novel. Yet the novelist who is also a poet views his potential work with the eyes of his entire culture; there is no way for a writer to write like Homer, say, or Dante in our timeâ or in Dostoevskyâ s

    0

    full texts

    2,001

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    UDSpace University of Dallas
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇