Australian Mathematical Society (AustMS): E-Journals
Not a member yet
3379 research outputs found
Sort by
On the -error linear complexity of sequences from function fields
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S000497271900132
Overpartitions related to the mock theta function
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S000497271900161
Deforming a starshaped curve into a circle by an area-preserving flow
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S000497272000037
Note on Fourier-Stieltjes coefficients of coin-tossing measures
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S000497272000031
On asymptotics of functionals of random fields with long-range dependence
DOI:
10.1017/S000497272000013
Extraction of density-layered fluid from a porous medium
We consider axisymmetric flow towards a point sink from a stratified fluid in a vertically confined aquifer. We present two approaches to solve the equations of flow for the linear density gradient case. Firstly, a series method results in an eigenfunction expansion in Whittaker functions. The second method is a simple finite difference method. Comparison of the two methods verifies the finite difference method is accurate, so that more complicated nonlinear, density stratification can be considered. Such nonlinear profiles cannot be considered with the eigenfunction approach. Interesting results for the case where the density stratification changes from linear to almost two-layer are presented, showing that in the nonlinear case there are certain values of flow rate for which a steady solution does not occur.
References
Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A., Handbook of Mathematical Functions, 9th ed. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, 1972.
Bear, J. and Dagan, G. Some exact solutions of interface problems by means of the hodograph method. J. Geophys. Res. 69(8):1563–1572, 1964. doi:10.1029/JZ069i008p01563
Bear, J. Dynamics of fluids in porous media. Elsevier, New York, 1972. https://store.doverpublications.com/0486656756.html
COMSOL Multiphysics. COMSOL Multiphysics Programming Reference Manual, version 5.3. https://doc.comsol.com/5.3/doc/com.comsol.help.comsol/COMSOL_ProgrammingReferenceManual.pdf
Farrow, D. E. and Hocking, G. C. A numerical model for withdrawal from a two layer fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 549:141–157, 2006. doi:10.1017/S0022112005007561
Henderson, N., Flores, E., Sampaio, M., Freitas, L. and Platt, G. M. Supercritical fluid flow in porous media: modelling and simulation. Chem. Eng. Sci. 60:1797–1808, 2005. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2004.11.012
Lucas, S. K., Blake, J. R. and Kucera, A. A boundary-integral method applied to water coning in oil reservoirs. ANZIAM J. 32(3):261–283, 1991. doi:10.1017/S0334270000006858
Meyer, H. I. and Garder, A. O. Mechanics of two immiscible fluids in porous media. J. Appl. Phys., 25:1400–1406, 1954. doi:10.1063/1.1721576
Muskat, M. and Wycokoff, R. D. An approximate theory of water coning in oil production. Trans. AIME 114:144–163, 1935. doi:10.2118/935144-G
GNU Octave. https://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/v4.2.1/
Yih, C. S. On steady stratified flows in porous media. Quart. J. Appl. Maths. 40(2):219–230, 1982. doi:10.1090/qam/666676
Yu, D., Jackson, K. and Harmon, T. C. Disperson and diffusion in porous media under supercritical conditions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 54:357–367, 1999. doi:10.1016/S0009-2509(98)00271-1
Zhang, H. and Hocking, G. C. Axisymmetric flow in an oil reservoir of finite depth caused by a point sink above an oil-water interface. J. Eng. Math. 32:365–376, 1997. doi:10.1023/A:1004227232732
Zhang, H., Hocking, G. C. and Seymour, B. Critical and supercritical withdrawal from a two-layer fluid through a line sink in a bounded aquifer. Adv. Water Res. 32:1703–1710, 2009. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.09.002
Zill, D. G. and Wright, W. S. Differential Equations with Boundary-value problems, 8th Edition. Brooks Cole, Boston USA, 2013
University STEM students' perceptions of creativity in non-routine problem-solving
The primary purpose of this study is to investigate students' perceptions about the characteristics of creativity and engagement in solving non-routine problems. It involved 64 science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) university students, who participated in a two-year research project in New Zealand during which participants were given opportunities to utilise puzzle-based learning in their courses. Comparing open-ended responses of two surveys, this article focuses on student perceptions about attributes of creativity in non-routine problem-solving. These results have pedagogical implications for tertiary stem education.
References
A. J. Baroody and A. Dowker. The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructive adaptive expertise. Routledge, 2013. URL https://www.routledge.com/The-Development-of-Arithmetic-Concepts-and-Skills-Constructive-Adaptive/Baroody-Dowker/p/book/9780805831566.
S. A. Costa. Puzzle-based learning: An approach to creativity, design thinking and problem solving. implications for engineering education. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), 2017. doi:10.24908/pceea.v0i0.7365.
N. Falkner, R. Sooriamurthi, and Z. Michalewicz. Teaching puzzle-based learning: Development of transferable skills. Teach. Math. Comput. Sci., 10(2):245–268, 2012. doi:10.5485/TMCS.2012.0304.
A. Fisher. Critical thinking: An introduction. Cambridge University Press, 2011. URL https://www.cambridge.org/us/education/subject/humanities/critical-thinking/critical-thinking-2nd-edition/critical-thinking-introduction-2nd-edition-paperback?isbn=9781107401983.
E. C. Fortes and R. R. Andrade. Mathematical creativity in solving non-routine problems. The Normal Lights, 13(1), 2019. URL http://po.pnuresearchportal.org/ejournal/index.php/normallights/article/view/1237.
P. Gnadig, G. Honyek, and K. F. Riley. 200 puzzling physics problems: With hints and solutions. Cambridge University Press, 2001. URL https://www.cambridge.org/us/academic/subjects/physics/general-and-classical-physics/200-puzzling-physics-problems-hints-and-solutions?format=AR&isbn=9780521774802.
J. P. Guilford. Creativity: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. J. Creative Behav., 1(1):3–14, 1967. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1967.tb00002.x.
J. P. Guilford. Characteristics of Creativity. Illinois State Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, Springfield. Gifted Children Section, 1973. URL https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED080171.
G. Hatano and Y. Oura. Commentary: Reconceptualizing school learning using insight from expertise research. Ed. Res., 32(8):26–29, 2003. doi:10.3102/0013189X032008026.
S. Klymchuk. Puzzle-based learning in engineering mathematics: Students\T1\textquoteright attitudes. Int. J.Math. Ed. Sci. Tech., 48(7): 1106–1119, 2017. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2017.1327088.
B. Martz, J. Hughes, and F. Braun. Developing a creativity and problem solving course in support of the information systems curriculum. J. Learn. High. Ed., 12(1):27–36, 2016. URL https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1139749.pdf.
Z. Michalewicz, N. Falkner, and R. Sooriamurthi. Puzzle-based learning: An introduction to critical thinking and problem solving. Hybrid Publishers, 2011.
B. Parhami. A puzzle-based seminar for computer engineering freshmen. Comp. Sci. Ed., 18(4):261–277, 2008. doi:10.1080/08993400802594089. URL http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&id.
G. Polya. How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press, 2004. URL https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691164076/how-to-solve-it.
M. A. Runco. Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Elsevier, 2014. URL https://www.elsevier.com/books/creativity/runco/978-0-12-410512-6.
A. H. Schoenfeld. Mathematical problem solving. Elsevier, 2014. URL https://www.elsevier.com/books/mathematical-problem-solving/schoenfeld/978-0-12-628870-4.
C. Thomas, M. Badger, E. Ventura-Medina, and C. Sangwin. Puzzle-based learning of mathematics in engineering. Eng. Ed., 8(1):122–134, 2013. doi:10.11120/ened.2013.00005.
M. O. J. Thomas. Developing versatility in mathematical thinking. Med. J. Res. Math. Ed., 7(2):67–87, 2008.
A. Valentine, I. Belski, and M. Hamilton. Developing creativity and problem-solving skills of engineering students: A comparison of web and pen-and-paper-based approaches. Eur. J. Eng. Ed., 42(6):1309–1329, 2017. doi:10.1080/03043797.2017.1291584.
G. Wallas. The art of thought. Solis Press, 1926
Arithmetric properties of coefficients of the mock theta function
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S000497271900117