Texas Water Journal (TWJ - Texas Digital Library, TDL E-Journals)
Not a member yet
130 research outputs found
Sort by
Reutilización del agua en el país de las colinas: Análisis de oportunidades en el condado de Comal, Texas
No full textThe Greater Edwards Aquifer Alliance outlines the opportunities present in the Texas Hill Country to use recycled water to alleviate the burdens placed on the Edwards and Trinity aquifers by focusing on the present state of recycled water use in Comal County, Texas. The impacts of population growth, prolonged drought, and wastewater disposal on water sources in Comal County are analyzed along with current sources of water reuse to show where recycled water can be utilized effectively. Reclaimed water systems in seven municipalities across Texas are analyzed as case studies to provide examples for further implementation. Water reuse is integral to protecting water supplies and ensuring counties in the Hill Country can adequately protect the health, safety, and quality of life of current and future residents. Water reuse is a vastly underutilized tool in the effort to manage water supplies in the Hill Country, and there are a variety of authorization, financing, and implementation opportunities present in the region to take better advantage of this resource.La Greater Edwards Aquifer Alliance resume las oportunidades en la region de las colinas utilizar agua reciclada para aliviar las cargas impuestas a los acuiferos Edwards y Trinity, centrandose en el estado actual del uso de agua reciclada en el condado de Comal, Texas. La reutilization del agua es esencial para proteger los suministros de agua y garantizar que los condados de la region puedan proteger adecuadamente la salud, seguridad, y la calidad de vida de los residentes actuales y futuros. La reutilizacion del agua es una herramienta muy infrautilizada en el esfuerzo por administrar el suministro de agua en la region, y hay una variedad de oportunidades de autorizacion, financiamiento e implementacion presentes en la region para aprovechar mejor este recurso. 
Differences in the Hydration State of Riparian Pecan Trees Between Rural and Urban Settings
No full textUrbanization causes changes in near-surface meteorology and rainfall-runoff relationships that threaten to place hydraulic stress on vegetation. The goal of this study was to investigate the differences in riparian zone tree hydration state, as indicated by leaf water potential, between an urban and a rural stream site, and to understand how the trees respond differently to precipitation events. At the rural stream site, the streambed was dry due to persistent drought conditions, whereas the urban stream site had established flow due to urban water inputs. The trees at the urban site were found to suffer less hydraulic stress than the trees at the rural site, as indicated by predawn leaf water potential measurements. Additionally, trees at the rural site were found to regulate stomatal openness to reduce transpiration on the day before rain, but not after, due to the presence of near-surface moisture introduced by the rain event. Trees at the urban site did not have to regulate stomatal openness before or after the rain, as the established flow in the stream provided consistent water access. These findings support the viability of protecting and preserving riparian ecosystems in urban settings
Addressing Challenges to Ensuring Justice and Sustainability in Policy and Infrastructure for Texas Water Resources in the 21st Century
No full textEnvironmental justice and sustainability have both become major concerns for water resource management, particularly with recent federal emphasis on environmental justice under the Biden administration in the United States. Texas, like many U.S. states, lags behind the federal government in this emphasis. While many localities have made progress in some respects—for example, some major Texas municipalities have included equity and sustainability metrics in their recent climate action plans—others have not. This has left a patchwork of persistent water management and availability issues that are exacerbated by extreme weather and worsening impacts of climate change. We provide a review of many of Texas’s water equity and sustainability challenges, both now and in a more extreme climate future. These include water access, affordability, contamination, flooding, drought, and aging infrastructure. For example, many Texas counties rank highest in the nation for flood risk, including coastal counties with high populations of disadvantaged communities and counties containing populations that live in persistent poverty in the Lower Rio Grande Valley. Additionally, approximately 44,000 Texans, or about 0.4% of the state population, lack access to complete plumbing facilities in their homes. The costs of water infrastructure leaks (estimated at about 51 gallons of water per day statewide) are shared across customers of all income levels, though they place a disproportionate burden on low-income customers. We then assess existing statewide and local policy and planning efforts and gaps in addressing these concerns in Texas. We focus particularly on the role of efforts to incorporate community voice—the ideas, concerns, needs, and expertise of impacted community members, dismantle causes of injustice, and improve equity in spending. If communities are not intentional with future development, new water infrastructure could continue to perpetuate existing harms. Thus, we provide a research agenda and recommendations for addressing some of the policy and planning gaps and persistent environmental justice issues. We aim to help water managers and policy makers identify and dismantle sources of inequity, particularly through including community voice
Best Management Practices to Mitigate Contamination of Karstic Aquifers from Emergency Fire-Control Runoff
No full textWe propose best management practices to increase karstic aquifer drinking water supplies’ resilience to potential hazardous material impacts where first responders and public safety officials suspect emergency firefighting runoff has entered the subsurface in the aquifer recharge zone. Karstic aquifers are unique because of their direct openings to the land’s surface, which allows contaminants in runoff or other surface waters to rapidly enter the subsurface and impact aquifer water quality. In the United States, 20% of the land surface is karst, and about a third of the groundwater used for drinking comes from karstic aquifers. Proposed best management practices emphasize on-site, real-time evaluation of the transport and fate of HAZMAT that may enter the subsurface and focus on water quality sampling, runoff and groundwater flow modeling, nontoxic dye tracing, and related studies for use in planning before and during an event and after emergency response has ended. We recommend best management practices for evidence-based screening of high-risk sites to facilitate placement of hazardous material sampling devices and emergency responder deployment. The best management practices, tools, curricula, and training described combine with earlier work by the authors to provide a comprehensive menu of actions to (1) help first responders prevent or limit flushing of hazardous material into a karstic aquifer; (2) help emergency management officials understand the consequences of contamination and issue data-driven geographically focused health and safety risk communications; and (3) help provide health and safety officials with relevant science- and data-based information that can help mitigate human and environmental health risks
The Use of Historical Data and Global Climate Models to Assess Historical and Future Surface Water and Groundwater Availability in the Trinity River Basin in Texas
No full textThis paper describes the results of a study that was done by the USGS to assess recent (2017) water availability, forecast long-term trends in water availability, assess changes in water availability, and forecast future water availability in the Trinity River Basin in Texas. The Trinity River Basin surface water model and Trinity River alluvium aquifer (TRAA) groundwater model were created to evaluate future conditions under different global climate models (GCM). The results of this study show minimal overall changes in water availability for both surface water and groundwater. Trend analyses using historical data (1900–2017) indicated an increase of annual precipitation on the watersheds that drain into the reservoirs in Regional Water Planning Group C. However, the Trinity River Basin surface water model GCM ensemble mean annual precipitation indicates a downward trend, resulting in a downward trend in surface runoff. Additionally, the GCM ensemble mean for the Trinity River Basin surface water model and the TRAA groundwater model both indicate a downward trend in recharge while the TRAA model GCM ensemble mean indicates an upward trend in the amount of groundwater leaving the aquifer to rivers and streams resulting in an upward trend of cumulative storage change
Discrete Streamflow Measurements and Waterborne Self-Potential Logging of a 43-Kilometer-Long Reach of the Elm Fork Trinity River Upstream from Dallas, Texas
No full textContinuous and discrete streamflow data were combined with waterborne self-potential (WaSP), surface-water temperature and surface-water conductivity surveys obtained along an approximately 43-kilometer (26.7 miles) surveyed reach of the Elm Fork Trinity River (hereinafter referred to as “Elm Fork”) upstream from Dallas, Texas, to investigate areas of gaining and losing streamflow under various streamflow and seasonal climatic conditions. Discrete streamflow measurements were made at 17 locations on October 12, 2021, and January 25, 2022, at 19 locations on May 17, 2022, and at 18 locations on August 9, 2022. WaSP data were measured from a kayak in January 2022 during a period of base flow along three individually surveyed reaches between the Lake Lewisville Dam and Frasier Dam on the Elm Fork. Together, these data indicated different parts of the Elm Fork functioned as either a gaining or losing stream depending on streamflow and seasonal climatic conditions. Overall, there were estimated net gains in streamflow during the first two discrete-measurement events of about 107 cubic feet per second (ft3/s) and 2 ft3/s in October 2021 and January 2022, respectively, and estimated net losses in streamflow in May 2022 and August 2022 of about 24 ft3/s and 18 ft3/s, respectively
Low Flow Trends in Texas Stream Segments Serving Unique Hydrologic Functions
No full textIn recognition of the unique hydrologic functions they serve, certain stream segments in Texas have been designated as ecologically significant. In this study, we evaluated low flow trends in seven hydrologically unique stream segments spanning three climatic divisions in Texas from 1970 to 2019. Despite increasing mean annual temperatures, there are no trends in low flows or other hydrologic variables in the East Fork of the San Jacinto River in the Upper Coast climatic division, likely due to local moisture surplus effects from the Gulf of Mexico. In the Edwards Plateau climatic division, annual low flows and annual baseflows are decreasing in the South Fork of the Guadalupe River, the Sabinal River and the Frio River. While increasing mean annual temperatures appear to have a role in the drying of all three of these stream segments, increasing annual potential evapotranspiration may be an additional driver in the Sabinal and Frio Rivers. Analysis of the Standardized Streamflow Index indicates that all seven stream segments experienced their worst streamflow droughts in the 2010s. As such, the watersheds draining to the gages on these stream segments have minimal anthropogenic impacts, suggesting the influence of climate on the observed stream drying
The State of Texas Wetlands: A Review of Current and Future Challenges
No full textWith roughly 3.9 million acres of wetlands, 2.3% of its total land area, Texas has the fifth largest wetland acreage in the United States. As of 1990, there was an estimated 52% reduction in the state\u27s original wetland acreage, but there has been no recent assessment of statewide wetland loss or gain since then. Wetlands provide critical ecosystem services, including wildlife habitat, flood storage and control, aquifer recharge, water quality improvement, and pollutant breakdown and storage of greenhouse gasses as well as human recreational opportunities including boating, paddling, fishing, hunting, birdwatching, hiking, and nature photography. Texas wetlands face intensifying challenges in the coming decades. Regulatory and legislative action should be forward-facing, anticipating effects of climate change, sea level rise, and urban expansion. Incorporating new technologies will allow for more timely and cost-efficient large-scale monitoring of wetland loss and gain. The residents of Texas are largely in support of active management of the state’s water resources; academic institutions, state and federal agencies, and conservation-minded private entities should work together to ensure the wetlands of Texas persist for wildlife and the generations to come
Commentary: Water Infrastructure and Supply Are the Backbone or Achilles’ Heel of Texas’ Future: The Choice is Ours
No full textEditor-in-Chief\u27s Note: In every odd-numbered year, the Texas Legislature convenes in regular session for 140 days. With this in mind, the Texas Water Journal invited Senator Charles Perry, Chairman of the Senate Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs Committee to discuss his priorities and visions for Texas water and the regular session of the 88th Texas Legislature. The opinion expressed in this commentary is the opinion of the individual author and not the opinion of the Texas Water Journal or the Texas Water Resources Institute, or the Bureau of Economic Geology
88th Texas State Legislature: Summaries of Water-Related Legislative Action
No full textEditor-in-Chief ’s Note: September 1 of every odd-numbered year is the date when most new legislation from the most recent session of the Texas Legislature typically goes into effect. With this in mind, the Texas Water Journal invited seven organizations that work closely with the Texas Legislature to provide their take on the changes to Texas water policy and law that were made during the 2023 session. The opinions expressed in these summaries are the opinions of the individual organizations and not the opinions of the Texas Water Journal, the Texas Water Resources Institute, or the Bureau of Economic Geology