St. Mary's University, Texas
St. Mary's University, San Antonio: St. Mary's Law Digital RepositoryNot a member yet
1503 research outputs found
Sort by
Moot Points Notes from the Sarita Kenedy East Law Library Issue 10 August 2010
No full textDirector's Message: Student Survey Results, Meeting Katy Stein Faculty Services Librarian, Recent Faculty Publications, Our Library By the Numbers, References to Reference, Recommended Reading, Legal Film Showcase: L.A. Confidentia
09-0828 GENESIS TAX LOAN SERVICES, INC. v. KOTHMANN
No full text09-0828 Genesis Tax Loan Services Inc., et al. v. Kody and Janet Kothmann from Lubbock County and the Seventh District Court of Appeals, Amarillo For petitioners: G. Roland Love, Dallas For respondents: Mont McClendon, Lubbock The issues in this case bet
Texas Judicial Council Meeting
No full textAGENDA SUPREME COURT COURTROOM 201 W. 14th Street, 1st Floor AUSTIN, TEXAS Action and Discussion Items: I. Commencement of Meeting – Presiding Judge Sharon Keller II. Attendance of Members – Carl Reynolds III. Minutes of Previous Meeting – Presiding Judg
09-0039 BIC PEN CORP. v. CARTER
No full text09-0039 BIC Pen Corp. v. Janace M. Carter from Matagorda County and the 13th District Court of Appeals, Corpus Christi/Edinburg For petitioner: Reagan W. Simpson, Austin For cross-petitioner/respondent: Lisa Powell, McAllen Principal issues in this case
09-0313 LOFTIN v. LEE
No full text09-0313 Terri Loftin v. Janice Lee and Bob Lee from Angelina County and the 12th District Court of Appeals, Tyler For petitioner: Robert T. Cain Jr., Lufkin For respondents: Douglas J. McCarver, Nacogdoches Principal issues are (1) whether liability for
Cap-and-Trade Spells Economic Disaster for America's Poor (Essay)
No full textThis Essay demonstrates that a fundamental misinterpretation of economic forces among environmental advocates and their allies in Congress could lead to a regulatory scheme that destroys production and has a harmful effect on poor Americans through job losses and higher energy costs. Part II outlines the economic theory supporting the cap-and-trade system set forth in the ACESA. Part III inspects the ACESA and Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates to better understand the effect this legislation would have on the national economy. Part IV argues that the ACESA would have a chilling effect on the U.S. economy by raising the cost of energy for all consumers with an exceptionally harmful impact on America's poor and minority communities