LARC Cardoso Law (Yeshida Univ)
Not a member yet
9951 research outputs found
Sort by
Equity and Clarity: The Impact of \u3ci\u3eTyler v. Hennepin County\u3c/i\u3e on Property Taxation and Homeowners’ Rights
Full text linkThis Note explores the implications ofthe U.S. Supreme Court\u27s ruling in Tyler v. Hennepin County, which significantly impacts property taxation and foreclosure laws. The Court ruled that property owners are entitled to surplus proceeds following a tax foreclosure, setting a new precedent by deeming it unconstitutional for governments to retain surplus proceeds without just compensation. Tyler clarified property rights under the Fifth Amendment, affirming that owners have a constitutional right to the surplus value of their foreclosed properties, even if local statutes do not explicitly allow it.
Further, this Note also addresses unresolved issues following Tyler\u27s ruling, including how the ruling affects the privatization of tax lien sales and whether just compensation should be based on fair market value or surplus proceeds. Moreover, it highlights that private third parties purchasing tax liens may now be held accountable under the Takings Clause, adding a layer of complexity to foreclosure procedures. Ultimately, Tyler reshapes the landscape of property tax foreclosures, ensuring stronger protections for homeowners while raising questions about the future of related legal practices
Cardozo Law Receives Top Marks from preLaw Magazine
Full text linkCardozo Law earned multiple A+ rankings from preLaw Magazine in 2024–2025 for excellence in Dispute Resolution, Business Law, Entertainment Law, Trial Advocacy, and International Law, highlighting the school’s nationally recognized programs and hands-on learning opportunities
Jefferson et al. reply
Full text linkNotwithstanding Amgen’s strenuous objections, the core premise of our article should be uncontroversial to most policy analysts: biosimilar firms that simply want to manufacture an originator biologic in the manner it was manufactured at the time of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval should be able to enter the market expeditiously once valid manufacturing (and other valid patents) that legitimately cover the ‘at approval’ biologic have expired. Our core premise relies on the widely accepted values of patent validity and notice. Instead of expensive litigation discovery fights over such ‘at approval’ issues, of the sort Amgen itself has spearheaded (as we discuss below), our article proposes that expert examiners be allowed to improve validity and notice more cheaply and impartially ex ante
The Ticketing Industry Is Broken: States, Not Congress, Must Act Now (Guest Post)
No full textConcertgoers and members of Congress agree: The concert ticket industry is broken, and fans pay the price. Secondary resellers routinely snap up tickets, fleecing fans and hurting artists. But it need not be this way. State legislatures have the power and responsibility to pass laws that bring resale prices down by encouraging ticket affordability and accessibility
Saying Farewell to America\u27s Most Renowned Criminal Lawyer Roy Black—The Defense Finally Rests
No full textRenowned criminal defense lawyer Roy Black, who died recently at age 80, didn’t need theatrics. And not just because he represented so many high-profile, often controversial clients over his long career
Kathryn O. Greenberg Immigration Justice Clinic Wins Victory for Client Under Convention Against Torture
No full textThe Kathryn O. Greenberg Immigration Justice Clinic at Cardozo School of Law secured a major win for a client facing deportation. Under the supervision of Clinical Teaching Fellow Ellie Norton, students Vasundhra Navjeevan ’25 and Anais Rosenblatt ’25 successfully argued that their client qualified for protection under the Convention Against Torture, preventing his return to a country where he risked severe harm. The students dedicated months of research and advocacy, producing a 50-page brief and representing their client in court, resulting in a decision that adopted many of their arguments
Cardozo Dispute Resolution Competition Honor Society Team Earns Top Honors at CPR’s 2025 International Mediation Competition
No full textThe Cardozo Dispute Resolution Competition Honor Society (CDRCHS) Team competed at this year\u27s CPR International Mediation Competition April 3-5 in São Paulo, Brazil
Cardozo Celebrates the Class of 2025 at 47th Commencement
No full textOn June 4, 2025, Cardozo celebrated its 47th Commencement at Lincoln Center’s David Geffen Hall, conferring degrees on 304 J.D. graduates and 83 LL.M. graduates. Dean Melanie Leslie ’91 reminded students of their responsibility to uphold the Constitution, while keynote speaker Hon. Caitlin J. Halligan urged them to pursue meaningful paths in the law. Student speakers Koral Bahat, Denise Pasi, and Talia Raoufpur reflected on resilience, diversity, and community. Yeshiva University President Rabbi Dr. Ari Berman encouraged graduates to lead with integrity and purpose.
The ceremony also honored faculty and administrators with awards for excellence in teaching, service, and student support, alongside recognition of 58 students at the morning Commencement Awards Ceremony
Cardozo Law News Brief: September 12, 2025
No full textThis Cardozo Law News Brief highlights Professor Lindsay Nash’s comments to WNYC on the risks of racial profiling in immigration enforcement following recent Supreme Court cases, and Professor Stew Sterk’s remarks to Reuters on the political misuse of prosecutorial discretion. It also features faculty scholarship and news, including Professor Wilfred Codrington III’s presentations at the 2025 FSU Election Law Conference and SUNY New Paltz, Professor Rebecca Ingber’s appearances on multiple podcasts discussing U.S. military actions, Professor Burton Lipshie’s upcoming lectures to New York judges, Professor Nash’s paper presentation at University of Arizona Law, and Professor Gabor Rona’s published letter to The New York Times
Corporate Evolution
No full textPolitical entrepreneurs have declared war on environmental, social, and governance policies ( ESG ), going so far as to attempt to criminalize ESG-influenced investing. They seek a return to some real or imagined past. They amplify and elevate their efforts into mainstream public discourse. They pursue extraordinary goals and tactics to disrupt and even dismantle institutional structures, norms, and established processes. The contemporary anti-ESG backlash is not simply a battle over corporate purpose and the dueling perspectives of shareholder primacy versus stakeholderism or disputes concerning sustainable investment and operational strategies. It reflects aggressive political entrepreneurship and the tension between competing narratives: stasis, reversion, and evolution. Whereas anti-ESG political entrepreneurs see stability in the past, others see corporate governance as evolving forward, albeit with occasional fluctuations. This Article contributes to the corporate governance literature advancing an evolutionary theory. It posits that the demands and expectations placed upon directors and officers must evolve with the growing complexity of the global business environment. It advances the need for incremental changes to corporate law and governance. It finds support in corporate law, modern corporate governance practices, and theory