LARC Cardoso Law (Yeshida Univ)
Not a member yet
9951 research outputs found
Sort by
IP and Tech Dealmaking, With Jonathan Ashtor of Paul, Weiss
No full textFast-paced and constantly evolving, the world of intellectual property and technology law is not meant to be practiced in a vacuum. This is no secret to Jonathan Ashtor, global co-head of the Intellectual Property and Technology Transactions Group at Paul, Weiss, who not only brings an exceptional level of business acumen to his work as an IP and tech lawyer, but also calls upon his science and engineering background. Named among Lawdragon’s 500 Leading Dealmakers in America, Ashtor embraces a multidisciplinary approach, working at the juncture of corporate and IP law on some of the largest, most transformational technology transactions for major companies
Canceling Lawyers: Case Studies of Accountability, Toleration, and Regret
Get PDFhttps://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/flyers-2024-2025/1035/thumbnail.jp
Corn War: A Trade Fight Between the United States and Mexico
Get PDFAn international fight grows over corn. The United States claims that México’s ban on genetically modified (GMO) corn violates the United StatesMexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). México prohibits GMO corn for human consumption. American arguments focus on Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) measures, covered in Chapter 9 of the USMCA. A trade panel will review these.
This Essay first describes SPS arguments and relevant trade rules. The United States’ complaints emphasize that México’s ban is excessive, is not consistent with international standards, and mishandles risks. Second, the Essay identifies the obstacles American positions face: weak mandates and deference to México. Chapter 9 of the USMCA does not require conformity with international standards or risk assessments. Rather, it only requires that México consider these standards and risks. Plus, Chapter 9 defers to Mexico’s determinations on food safety, which are labelled the “appropriate level of protection” under USMCA and World Trade Organization (WTO) rules. The panel will defer to the level set by México and then evaluate American complaints on standards, trade restrictions, and risks. The upshot: the USMCA is not the clear free trade answer the United States seeks. Because of this, it should pursue resolution versus fruitless legal conflict
The Gloria and Stanley Plesent Lecture: The Architecture of Desire: How the Law Shapes Interracial Intimacy and Perpetuates Inequality with Professor Solangel Maldonado
Get PDFProfessor Maldonado is Eleanor Bontecou Professor of Law at Seton Hall Law School. She writes and teaches in the areas of family law, gender, race and their intersections. She is an Associate Reporter for the American Law Institute’s Restatement of the Law, Children and the Law, and author of The Architecture of Desire: How the Law Shapes Interracial Intimacy and Perpetuates Inequality (NYU Press, 2024). She is the co-editor of two casebooks—Family Law: Cases and Materials (Foundation Press, 7th ed. 2019) and Family Law in the World Community (Carolina Academic Press, 3rd ed. 2015). She serves on the editorial board of the American Bar Association’s Family Law Quarterly and as Vice-Chair of the Board of Trustees of the New Jersey Law and Education Empowerment Project (NJ LEEP), a pipeline and college access program for middle and high school students from underserved communities.https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/event-invitations-2024/1030/thumbnail.jp
Confronting the War on International Law in the United States
Get PDFHarold Hongju Koh’s The National Security Constitution in the 21st Century is a code red threat assessment of the state of public law in America today. True to Koh’s nature, he does not leave us without hope; rather he devotes a sizeable portion of the book to calls for reform, from the legal frameworks governing war powers and intelligence to the division of labor in the national security legal bureaucracy plodding away within the deepest (secure) chambers of the executive branch itself
Litigation and the 2024 Election: Critical Questions
Get PDFhttps://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/flyers-2024-2025/1020/thumbnail.jp
PCLJ at Cardozo Shares Statement from Ohio Prosecutor Tomlinson On Vacating Conviction of Ohio 4
Get PDFStatement by Lorain, OH Prosecutor J.D. Tomlinson On Vacatying Conviction of Four Ohio Men Convicted of 1991 Murderhttps://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cardozo-news-2024/1039/thumbnail.jp
Scientist Zafra Lerman To Receive Cardozo’s 24th Annual International Advocate for Peace Award in March
Get PDFScientist, educator, and humanitarian Dr. Zafra Lerman will be honored with Cardozo School of Law’s 24th International Advocate for Peace Award on March 6, 2025. Presented annually by the Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution, this award recognizes individuals and organizations who demonstrate excellence in conflict resolution. Lerman is being recognized for her work as President of the Malta Conferences Foundation, where she brings together scientists from historically hostile countries in the Middle East to collaborate on issues such as environmental health and energy. She is also a renowned advocate for scientific freedom and human rights.https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cardozo-news-2024/1036/thumbnail.jp
Privacy Law’s Role in an Information Economy
Get PDFWhat do we lose when we lose our privacy? A slew of recently enacted state laws suggest that the loss of privacy is merely a loss of individual choice in the market exchange of services for personal information. This Article argues that a loss of privacy risks something greater: the collapse of complex and fluid social identity. Without privacy, individuals cannot nurture their own senses of self because they are no longer free to try on different social roles across diverse relationships. Pervasive, private data collection threatens multifaceted selfhood by eliminating the boundaries that make social roles distinct and hindering the possibility of withdrawal from view.
If a loss of privacy entails a loss of our selves, how do we gain ourselves back? This Article argues the answer is in the “role” of privacy law in two senses. Normatively, it asserts online privacy law should work towards restoring the roleplay that underwrites social selfhood. Methodologically, it contends online privacy law should pursue that end through thoughtful “legal role-scripting.” Privacy lawmakers should be attentive to the social roles they ascribe to the data collectors and internet users law regulates. Legal role-scripts orient and pre-commit law in multiple ways. They establish a set of evaluative criteria that justify or undermine particular rights or responsibilities. They also direct courts to particular lines of legal precedent.
Following this understanding of privacy law’s role, this Article uncovers a better way it can safeguard dynamic identity formation. It argues privacy governance law—an original legislative proposal—is better suited than alternative reforms to empower internet users to engage in self-constructive roleplay. It characterizes private, online data collection in terms of a governance relationship, with data collectors hegemonically deciding how they will collect and use internet users’ personal information. Privacy law, in this formulation, works to afford internet users countervailing power to participate in collective decision-making about the privacy practices appropriate to their relationships with diverse data collectors. This offers internet users the greatest possibility of reclaiming emergent selfhood in an information economy
Gagosian Gallery: Walk Through and Talk with Diana Poussin
Get PDFhttps://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/flyers-2024-2025/1044/thumbnail.jp