LARC Cardoso Law (Yeshida Univ)
Not a member yet
9951 research outputs found
Sort by
Kukin Program for Conflict Resolution Spring 2025 Events
No full textKukin Program for Conflict Resolution Spring 2025 Events: A Conversation with Gretchen Carlson & Julie Roginsky, Thursday, March 27 at 12:40 p.m. Book Talk with Sarah Staszak, Tuesday, April 1 at 4:00 p.m. Trauma-Transformed Law: The Why and How of Trauma-Informed Care (TIC) Practice, Wednesday, April 2 at 12:40 p.m.https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/event-invitations-2025/1014/thumbnail.jp
Trauma-Transformed Law: The Why and How of Trauma-Informed Care (TIC) Practice
No full textFrom intake to deposition, mediation, and trial, legal clients are traversing one of the most re-traumatizing experiences of their lives when they decide to seek justice. Understanding how to address this from a personal and systems theory approach benefits survivors and attorneys alike, increasing client satisfaction, referrals, retention, and preventing longitudinal burnout. In this presentation, Dr. Laura McGuire, creator of the Certified Trauma-Informed ® Legal Professional program, will highlight some of the key areas of TIC in practice and offer additional insight into real-world application.https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/event-invitations-2025/1016/thumbnail.jp
From Studio to Statute: Navigating Creativity, Innovation, and Law in the Music Industry
No full texthttps://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/flyers-2025-2026/1001/thumbnail.jp
All things ADR
No full textJoin us for lunch with the Kukin Program faculty and student leaders to learn about:
The Certificate in Dispute Resolution
Dispute Resolution Courses & Clinics
The Dispute Resolution Competition Honor Society
The Dispute Resolution Societyhttps://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/flyers-2025-2026/1005/thumbnail.jp
The Bet Tzedek\u27s 40th Anniversary Celebration
No full textJoin us for cocktails & hors d\u27oeuvres as we celebrate Prof. Salzman’s 35th and final year at Cardozo!https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/flyers-2024-2025/1063/thumbnail.jp
The Samuel & Ronnie Heyman Center on Corporate Governance Invites you to: Taxes vs Tariffs
No full textMarket participants are preparing for the tax and trade policies pursued by the second Trump administration. Regarding taxes, proposals include making expiring Tax Cuts and Jobs Act provisions permanent, ending green energy subsidies from the Inflation Reduction Act, and exempting certain income from taxation. Proposed tariffs range from retaliatory measures-in-kind to targeting Chinese market participation to a universal 20% import tariff. On the campaign trail, the President often presented these proposals as part of a shift of financial burdens from domestic taxpayers to foreign companies. In a panel discussion with tax and trade experts, we will seek to determine the feasibility of such an idea and the potential consequences of Republican proposals on taxes and tariffs.https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/event-invitations-2025/1026/thumbnail.jp
Subordinate Prosecutors’ Independence
No full textThis essay is about subordinate prosecutors’ independence to do what they think constitutes “seeking justice” when they perceive that their boss, or their boss’s boss, wants them to do something that is unjust—not illegal, but unjust. Of course, if subordinate prosecutors want to do either what they are told to do or what they infer that a higher-up wants them to do, they can do so, as long as the conduct is legal. Subordinate prosecutors might choose to disregard their own professional judgment of what justice requires because they share their boss’s objectives, because they see conforming as a route to advancement, because they are worried about their job, because they are indifferent, or for other reasons. But if one is assigned responsibility for a criminal investigation or prosecution, when is it permissible to act on one’s independent judgment about what prosecutorial norms require, and when might doing so be a transgression or insubordination? This is obviously a question of importance for federal prosecutors in 2025, given the current administration’s insistence on prosecutors’ loyalty to the president, his administration, and his agenda. But we began asking this question before the 2024 election, and, in our view, the question we ask is important at any time for prosecutors in any prosecutor’s office.
We reject the view that subordinate prosecutors must do what they think their bosses want (and seek to clarify any ambiguity), because they are essentially appendages of higher-ups. We argue that, in many situations, subordinate prosecutors have discretion to do what they reasonably conclude “seeking justice” entails. We explore how that discretion might be exercised when a chief prosecutor’s instructions or expectations are at odds with what we call the “soft law” of criminal prosecution—that is, the collection of professional understandings developed and expressed by judges, the legal profession, and prosecutors’ offices themselves that supplement, and are often less precise than, the legally enforceable law
Justices to Showcase Originalism Flaws in Slaughter Firing Case
No full textProfessor David Rudenstine Writes Op-Ed in Bloomberg Law About SCOTUS Trump v. Slaughter Case
The Chutick Law Library Present: De-Stress for Success
No full texthttps://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/flyers-2025-2026/1051/thumbnail.jp