LARC Cardoso Law (Yeshida Univ)
Not a member yet
9951 research outputs found
Sort by
Cardozo Law News Brief: March 7, 2025
No full textHighlights from the March 7, 2025 Cardozo Law News Brief include:
Scientist Zafra M. Lerman received the International Advocate for Peace Award at Cardozo and spoke on science education as a human right.
Professor Jessica Roth was quoted in The New York Times on internal tensions at the Justice Department.
Professor Matt Wansley spoke to The Washington Post about Tesla’s self-driving taxi plans.
Professor Andrea Schneider commented in Business Insider on U.S.-Ukraine Oval Office negotiations.
Professor Peter Markowitz discussed immigration enforcement in Newsweek and The Boston Globe.
Faculty updates include:
Professor Barbara Kolsun’s book The Business and Law of Fashion and Retail released in a second edition.
Professor Stewart Sterk named Distinguished Professor at Yeshiva University.https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/news-brief-2025/1006/thumbnail.jp
Cardozo Law News Brief: April 11, 2025
Get PDFHighlights from the April 11, 2025 Cardozo Law News Brief include: A $5M gift from Judith and William Greenblatt ’82, P’14 to establish the Judith and William Greenblatt Career Success Center.
Five new faculty members announced, joining Cardozo this summer.
The Immigration Justice Clinic wins a Convention Against Torture case, led by students and a clinical fellow.
Alumni Emma Guido Brill ’17 and Jonah Brill ’17 appear on the SPARKS podcast.
Professor Kathryn Miller and Professor Peter Markowitz quoted in The New York Times on DOJ and ICE issues.
Professor Gabor Rona publishes and speaks on international regulation of private military contractors.https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/news-brief-2025/1002/thumbnail.jp
My Religious Education Was Unparalleled — and That’s the Problem
No full textProfessor Zalman Rothschild Publishes Opinion Piece in The Washington Post About His Experience Growing Up With a Hasidic Educatio
Understanding Public Domain Case Citations
Get PDFI first learned about public domain citations after law school, when I was working on a fifty-state survey. I was completely used to parentheticals that included the deciding court and the year of decision, so I couldn’t understand the examples I found from certain states. I thought that surely something was missing from these citations
Coopting Disruption
Get PDFOur economy is dominated by five aging tech giants – Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, and Microsoft. In the last twenty years, no company has commercialized a new technology in a way that threatens them. Why?
We argue that the tech giants have learned how to coopt disruption. They identify potentially disruptive technologies, use their money to influence the startups developing them, strategically dole out access to the resources the startups need to grow, and seek regulation that makes it harder for the startups to compete. When a threat emerges, they buy it off. And after they acquire a startup, they redirect its people and assets to their own innovation needs. These seemingly unrelated behaviors work together to enable the tech giants to maintain their dominance in the face of disruptive innovations.
We show how three important new technologies – artificial intelligence, virtual reality, and automated driving – are being coopted right now. And we argue that, even though consumers sometimes benefit when startups partner with incumbents, coopting disruption is bad for both competition and innovation in the long run. At best, consumers receive incremental improvements to the tech giants’ existing products. They miss out on the more fundamental innovations that an independent company would have developed – both innovations that threaten an incumbent’s core business and those that a company locked into an existing mindset (and revenue stream) might simply not appreciate. Cooption cements incumbency, undermining the Schumpeterian competition that drove innovation in the tech industry throughout the 20th century.
We propose reforms that would make it harder to coopt disruption. We can revitalize a century-old law that prevents people from serving as officers or directors of their competitors, extending it to prevent incumbents from controlling the direction of startups. We can prohibit incumbent monopolies from discriminating in the access they provide to their data or networks based on whether the company is a competitive threat. We can ensure incumbents cannot use regulation as a mechanism to undercut competition. And we can make it presumptively illegal for incumbent monopolies to acquire startups that might compete with them
The Cardozo Center for Public Service Law Invites You To: P*Law 2025
Get PDFCardozo\u27s commitment to public service is highlighted every January during Public Interest Law Advocacy Week (P*LAW), a series of events that includes daily panels and workshops featuring inspiring conversations about the practice of public interest law. Join us for P*LAW 2025, which will feature panels discussing immigration, LGBTQ+ rights, reproductive freedom, human rights, labor relations, and more.https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/event-invitations-2025/1000/thumbnail.jp
The Business and Law of Fashion and Retail, Second Edition
No full textThe Business and Law of Fashion and Retail, edited by two veterans of the fashion world with contributions from lawyers of many of the top fashion companies, is a perfect text for courses in fashion law, retail law, and business school courses related to those industries.
The casebook—which is the only casebook on the subject—considers the strategic and legal perspectives in the growth of a fashion company and a lawyer\u27s role in both. Through legal cases, complaints, excerpts of regulations and academic articles the casebook covers effective strategies for intellectual property protection (including design protection, trademarks and copyrights), commercial operations and expansion of a brand (including employment, fashion licensing and advertising), commercial agreements (including brand collaboration agreements and retail leases), contractual compliance with sustainability issues, and human rights standards and professional responsibility.
With this new edition, cases, regulations, and academic materials have been updated to follow the rapidly evolving and growing area of fashion law.https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-books/1127/thumbnail.jp
P*LAW 2025: Immigration for LGBTQ+ Individuals: Laws, Barriers, and Insights
Get PDFA P*LAW 2025 event focused on the legal challenges and barriers faced by LGBTQ+ individuals in the immigration system. The panel featured legal experts and advocates discussing policy insights, representation, and protections for LGBTQ+ immigrants.https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/flyers-2024-2025/1058/thumbnail.jp
Convention on Safety for Survivors of Family Violence Involved in International Custody Disputes
Get PDFThis Article proposes a new treaty to fix the domestic violence problem that plagues the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. It argues that a new international instrument is legally permissible and would be the most efficient way to solve the problem. It compares the proposed solution to other child abduction instruments that exist in the European Union (EU) and Latin America but that do not address domestic violence. This Article proposes specific treaty provisions and provides commentary on those provisions. This Article is intended to influence state parties to the Hague Abduction Convention who are dissatisfied with the slow pace and direction of reform to date. It is also meant to influence policymakers attending the Forum on Domestic Violence and International Child Abduction, sponsored by the Hague Permanent Bureau and scheduled for the second half of 2025 in Brazil
Tax Policy and the Global Saving Glut
Get PDFThe tax rules governing investment in the United States offer very favorable treatment to foreign investors: the typical foreign investor pays no US. tax on passive investment in the United States. These tax rules have been shaped by the assumption that the United States needs to attract scarce financial capital to fill the gap between domestic saving and investment. But that assumption is wrong; global financial capital is not scarce. Over the past three decades, regressive economic policies abroad have suppressed consumption and led to an overabundance of saving. What is more, instead offinancing productive investment, the flow of that foreign saving to the United States has financed unproductive consumption, fueling a widening trade deficit and financialinstability. This Article calls for a reevaluation of U.S. inbound tax rules, proposing to increase taxation on foreign investment to address trade imbalances and enhance financial stability