LARC Cardoso Law (Yeshida Univ)
Not a member yet
9951 research outputs found
Sort by
Cardozo Students Learn Mediation Through Intensive Dispute Resolution Courses
Get PDFOver 50 Cardozo students took part in January’s intensive dispute resolution courses, gaining hands-on training in mediation, arbitration, and collaborative law through simulations led by expert faculty and practitioners
Regulating Hidden AI Authorship
Get PDFWith the rapid emergence of high-quality generative artificial intelligence (“AI”), some have advocated for mandatory disclosure when the technology is used to generate new text, images, or video. But the precise harms posed by nontransparent uses of generative AI have not been fully explored. While the use of the technology to produce material that masquerades as factual (“deepfakes”) is clearly deceptive, this Article focuses on a more ambiguous area: the consumer’s interest in knowing whether works of art or entertainment were created using generative AI. In the markets for creative content—fine art, books, movies, television, music, and the like—producers have several financial reasons to hide the role of generative AI in a work’s creation. Copyright law is partially responsible. The Copyright Office and courts have concluded that only human-authored works are copyrightable, meaning much AI-generated content falls directly into the public domain. Producers thus have an incentive to conceal the role of generative AI in a work’s creation because disclosure could jeopardize their ability to secure copyright protection and monetize the work. Whether and why this obfuscation harms consumers is a different matter. The law has never required disclosure of the precise ways a work is created; indeed, failing to publicly disclose the use of a ghostwriter or other creative assistance is not actionable. But AI authorship is different for several reasons. There is growing evidence that consumers have strong ethical and aesthetic preferences for human-created works and understand the failure to disclose AI authorship as deceptive. Moreover, hidden AI authorship is normatively problematic from the perspective of various theories of artistic value. Works that masquerade as human-made destabilize art’s ability to encourage self-definition, empathy, and democratic engagement, turning all creative works into exclusively entertainment-focused commodities. This Article also investigates ways to facilitate disclosure of the use of generative AI in creative works. Industry actors could be motivated to self-regulate, adopting a provenance-tracking or certification scheme. And Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) enforcement could provide some additional checks on the misleading use of AI in a work’s creation. Intellectual property law could also help incentivize disclosure. In particular, doctrines designed to prevent the overclaiming of material in the public domain—such as copyright misuse—could be used to raise the financial stakes of failing to disclose the role of AI in a work’s creation
Application for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Petitioners; Amicus Curiae Brief
Get PDFAmici curiae are law professors who teach and write about the function and role of state and federal courts. Because Amici have substantial expertise in the history, practices, and workings of courts, Amici submit this brief in the hope of being of assistance to this Court in its deliberation
Cardozo Law News Brief: April 25, 2025
Get PDFHighlights from the April 25, 2025 Cardozo Law News Brief include:
Professor Zalman Rothschild quoted in The New York Times on SCOTUS and religious exemptions.
Professor Jessica Roth featured in American Lawyer and CNN on pro bono work and deportation cases.
Professor Gabor Rona’s lawsuit over ICC sanctions covered by Bloomberg Law.
Professor Lindsay Nash presented immigration law scholarship at UNC.
Sarah Chu honored with a Women of Distinction award.https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/news-brief-2025/1001/thumbnail.jp
Thinking Outside the Box: A Creative Legal Conversation
No full textJoin Cardozo\u27s FAME Center as we host a mixer for FAME students and alumni, and members of the Hollywood Radio and Television Society. The event will feature a moderated panel discussion led by Entertainment Attorney and Cardozo alumna Cathy Perifimos \u2709, focusing on the intersection of legal and creative aspects within the television industry. A reception will follow.https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/event-invitations-2025/1006/thumbnail.jp
Book Talk with Sarah Staszak
No full textPrinceton Professor Sarah Staszak will be here on April 1 to talk about her new book, Privatizing Justice: Arbitration and the Decline of Public Governance in the United States. The book examines arbitration\u27s shift from a voluntary dispute resolution tool to a mandatory process favoring corporations. Staszak explores its historical and contemporary contexts, linking legal developments to broader institutional, political, and social dynamics.https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/event-invitations-2025/1015/thumbnail.jp
Dean Melanie Leslie’s Office Hours with Professor Jared Mayer
No full textJoin Dean Leslie and Professor Jared Mayer for the Dean\u27s Office Hours on October 20. They will discuss the economic impact of the tariffs and how American corporations are restructuring, often through litigation, as a result. The two will also answer questions raised by the student attendees.https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/event-invitations-2025/1021/thumbnail.jp
Navigating 1L First-Gen Professional Office Hours
No full textPlease join us for an informal office hour for an opportunity to connect with 2lL & 3L first generation professionals/law students. This is a casual event where 1L first gen students/profession are are encouraged to ask questions and gain insight from those who have navigated the legal field without a blueprint.https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/flyers-2025-2026/1000/thumbnail.jp
Kukin Program for Conflict Resolution Presents the Documentary Screening of Centered: Joe Lieberman
No full textIn an era where the pollical divide seems wider than ever, Lieberman\u27s story is more urgent and relevant every day. The film explores this life a career in ways that challenge to think about the future of democracy and how we can find ways to work together. No matter our differences.https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/flyers-2025-2026/1013/thumbnail.jp
A Framework for Trauma-Informed Mediation: A Heart and Mind Approach to Conflict Resolution
No full textUnresolved trauma histories can have both short and long-term consequences on children and parents\u27 overall functioning. Using a trauma-informed approach to mediation, we first briefly highlight the impactofadversechildhood experiencesandunresolvedtraumasonadults. We then consider the various vulnerabilities and activations presented within mediation and the fundamental principles of trauma-informed mediation to assist parties in remaining within the window of tolerance during the mediation. Trauma-informed mediation is an approach that encourages mediators to be aware of potential trauma activations and to engage in compassionate practices to allow parties to engage within their own individualized window of tolerance to resolve disputes. We explore the unique features of trauma-informed mediation and provide practical strategies to integrate these features in mediation with families