Copenhagen Business School: CBS Open Journals
Not a member yet
    5556 research outputs found

    Mens Rea and Narratives of Violence: The Guilty Mind in Twenty-First-Century American Literature

    Get PDF
    This article presents two twenty-first-century novels that deal with particularly charged and contemporary expressions of violence in the United States: Matthew Quick’s Forgive Me, Leonard Peacock and the threat of armed students in school, and John Updike’s Terrorist and the threat of Islamic extremism. High profile acts of violence of this kind in the United States leading up to and into the years following the turn of the millennium prompted significant concern surrounding the identification of would-be perpetrators, including those in the premeditating stage of their intended attacks. This article argues that stepping away from the violent act and focusing instead on the violent mind situates premeditation as an integral part of violence and its conceptualization. Further, interest in the internalized aspects of violence can be seen as a response to very real socio-cultural concerns in the United States. In order to achieve this analytical focus, the article adopts the legal concepts of mens rea (the guilty mind) and actus reus (the guilty act), interweaving them with literary criticism in order to suggest that novels can serve as Momusian windows into the premeditating stage of violence through immersion into the violent mind. In so doing, they contribute more robustly to broader understandings of violence in the United States as it evolves from concept to action. &nbsp

    Forsvandt mål 4 i skrivebordsskuffen?

    Get PDF
    Alle FN's 17 verdensmål er vigtige, men særligt mål nummer 4 om livslang læring og uddannelseskvalitet bør stå højt på dagsordenen i alle fag- forsknings - og uddannelsesbiblioteker. Men hvordan omsætte målet til konkret handling og en fælles praksis for bæredygtighed

    Faux Amis, Vrais Amis? Amis.

    Get PDF
    Recent commentaries on the relation between Deleuze and Foucault often operate with an implicit idea of compatibility or consistency that postulates systematic harmony as the decisive criterion for the affinity between them. Accordingly, the predominant question is whether Deleuze and Foucault are “true” friends philosophically and politically. Although the assessments differ, they share a likewise implicit notion of the friend as familiar that excludes any form of ambivalence in amicable relations and consequently cannot fully account for the dynamics and variability of the relation between Deleuze and Foucault. This article tries to address this problem by suspending the notion of the friend-as-familiar, effectively posing the question of what concept of friendship we would have if the ambivalent relation between Deleuze and Foucault would be the model. For this, the reconstruction begins with the early encounters and follows their relationship until the supposed split in the context of the desire-pleasure-debate. What becomes apparent is the dialogical structure of the philosophical friendship between Deleuze and Foucault that entails convergences as well as divergences, which will eventually be related to their own and fundamentally different concepts of friendship. Deleuze and Foucault, as will be argued, are neither “vrais amis” nor “faux amis” but simply amis that practised a form of philosophical friendship, lasting for more than 15 years

    Intolerable: A book symposium

    Get PDF

    Vejen til fælles biblioteksinfrastruktur: Énsøgeboks som vi kender det fra Google eller formularsøgning, hvor flere oplysninger kan indtastes?

    Get PDF
    Det er en af diskussionerne i arbejdet med at skabe en ny fælles, biblioteksinfrastruktur, som FFU deltager i. Et andet pejlepunkt er at forbedre den professionelle brugergrænseflade

    Training Farmers or Educating Citizens? A Very Brief History of Rural Education in China

    Get PDF
    Jørgen Delman’s Ph.D. thesis “Agricultural Extension in Renshou County, China” (1991) was the result of his return to academia in the late 1980s after he worked for three years at the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN in China. It is a detailed study of the complex rural bureaucracy promoting agricultural innovation and change and reflects a deep understanding of how things worked on the ground in those relatively early years of market-oriented rural reforms. It also contributes to a larger story of how ‘modern’ knowledge over the last century has been transmitted and negotiated between China’s urban centers and its countless rural communities. This vignette offers some thoughts on this larger topic

    Nr. 36 (2021)

    No full text

    4,653

    full texts

    5,556

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    Copenhagen Business School: CBS Open Journals
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇