University of Arkansas at Little Rock
University of Arkansas at Little Rock: UALR Bowen Law RepositoryNot a member yet
1877 research outputs found
Sort by
A History of the Missouri Court of Appeals: The Role of Regional Conflicts in Shaping Intermediate Appellate Court Structure
Constitutional Law—Extraditing the Foreign Fugitive: Disentitlement in Civil Forfeiture, United States v. All Assets Listed in Attachment A, 89 F. Supp. 3d 817 (E.D. Va. 2015)
Book Review: The Conflict Paradox: Seven Dilemmas at the Core of Disputes by Bernie Mayer
Bernie Mayer\u27s latest book is an excellent journey into seven key dilemmas in conflict. Mayer devotes a chapter to each of the following dilemmas: Competition and Cooperation, Optimism and Realism, Avoidance and Engagement, Principle and Compromise, Emotions and Logic, Impartiality and Advocacy, and Autonomy and Community. In this review, I suggest that the book is a thorough guide through seemingly diverse and opposing conflict theories. I go through each chapter and detail how Mayer sees these concepts as interwoven instead of oppositional. He walks his readers through what have been thought of as distinctive, even opposing, approaches, theories, and concepts of conflict. The review uses points and quotes from all seven dilemmas to show the depth of Mayer\u27s analysis and the numerous benefits to theorists and practitioners of reading and rereading his boo
A Call for Clarity Resulting from Daimler Ag v. Bauman: Jurisdictional Veil Piercing in the Context of Parent and Subsidiary Corporations and the Irrelevance of Fraud or Injustice
A Spirited Revolution: Local Option Elections and the Impending Death of Prohibition in Arkansas
Arkansas’s Trust Code and Trust Planning: A Ten-Year Perspective
In 2001, the Uniform Law Commission adopted the Uniform Trust Code, which regulates certain aspects of trusts. One impetus for the trust code was the ever-increasing popularity of revocable trusts as part of standard estate planning packages. Another was the fact that few states—including Arkansas—had well-developed common law trust rules, let alone any statutory trust codes. In 2005, the Arkansas legislature enacted a slightly modified version of the Uniform Trust Code (UTC), titled the Arkansas Trust Code (ATC). At that time, the University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review published my article summarizing the most important features of the new Trust Code, compared and contrasted with the then-current Arkansas common law of trusts. Since then, over ten years have passed, rendering further commentary timely. This update addresses two broad themes. Part II examines how the ATC has fared in Arkansas courts. Part III discusses some recent aspects of Arkansas trust law not covered by the ATC. Overall, the cases and statutes discussed are examined in the context of how they affect estate planning and administration