University of Cincinnati
University of Cincinnati, College of Law: Scholarship and PublicationsNot a member yet
1172 research outputs found
Sort by
Proportionality and the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(B)(1): An Empirical Inquiry
Full text linkTitle IX Reimagined: The Power of Principles-Based Governance
Full text linkTitle IX, a federal civil rights law enacted in 1972, prohibits sex-based discrimination in educational institutions. Title IX’s regulatory framework has evolved into a problematic hybrid of broad principles and prescriptive rules, creating significant challenges for educational institutions seeking to prevent sex discrimination and ensure gender equity. The current system’s simultaneous vagueness and rigidity has resulted in inconsistent enforcement, regulatory uncertainty, and compliance burdens that ultimately undermine Title IX’s fundamental objectives.
This Article argues that a properly structured principles-based regulatory approach would better serve Title IX’s aims while enhancing compliance and accountability. Successful implementation requires clear guiding principles, professional expertise, meaningful stakeholder engagement, and robust oversight mechanisms. Private rights of action represent a critical enforcement avenue, empowering community members to reinforce regulatory principles through direct accountability measures. Although comprehensive reform requires congressional action, this Article identifies practical pathways forward through state-level innovation, professional associations, and institutional consortia.
Section I traces Title IX’s historical evolution from its civil rights origins to its current complex implementation scheme. Section II introduces principles-based regulation, defining its key characteristics and advantages while contrasting it with prescriptive approaches. Section III diagnoses Title IX’s failures as a regulatory system, analyzing how vague principles and excessive prescription create paradoxical burdens for institutions, particularly in addressing sexual harassment. Section IV presents a comprehensive reform strategy, proposing how principles-based regulation could enhance Title IX’s effectiveness through clearer objectives, improved professional capacity, stakeholder engagement, and strengthened oversight. Section V synthesizes these reform elements to demonstrate how they would collectively strengthen enforcement and accountability in Title IX implementation.
Ultimately, this Article contends that principles-based regulation offers a path forward for Title IX to better address contemporary challenges while maintaining necessary flexibility. By empowering stakeholders through clear principles and multiple enforcement mechanisms, Title IX can evolve into a more effective framework that aligns with its core mission of ensuring educational equity
Equal Pay, Unequal Opinions: Navigating the Ongoing Circuit Split on Prior Pay as an Affirmative Defense Under the Equal Pay Act
Full text link
.Com or .Gov: Should the First Amendment Care? A Proposed Alternative to Moody v. NetChoice, LLC\u27s Editorial Discretion Rule
Full text linkToo Hot, Too Cold: The Search for Just-Right Platform Liability for Recommendation Algorithms
Full text linkKabwe’s Crisis: Toxic Lead Waste Poisoning Zambia’s Children
Full text linkKabwe, Zambia is among the most polluted cities, the result of nearly a century of lead mining and smelting. Despite the mine’s closure in 1994, an estimated 6.4 million tons of lead-contaminated waste continues to expose thousands of children to life-altering—and often irreversible—health consequences. This Article examines the Zambian government’s failure to remediate the environmental harm and protect children’s rights, analyzing both domestic legal obligations and international human rights treaties. It argues that the State’s pursuit of economic gain through continued lead processing has come at the expense of safeguarding the right to health and a healthy environment. Through an in-depth assessment of the Environmental Management Act No. 12 of 2011, the Children’s Code Act No. 12 of 2022, and Zambia’s obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the article reveals systemic regulatory neglect and calls for immediate, rights-based litigation. Ultimately, it contends that the children of Kabwe have been sacrificed at the expense of government profit, in violation of the legal protections designed to ensure their safety and well-being