Saint Louis University
Saint Louis University School of Law Research: Scholarship CommonsNot a member yet
3119 research outputs found
Sort by
Gender Identity, Health, and the Law: An Overview of Key Laws Impacting the Health of Transgender and Gender Non-Conforming People
A growing population of transgender, nonbinary, and other gender non-conforming Americans experience the burden of multiple physical and mental health inequities. Largely rooted in discrimination and stigma, these disparities are compounded by barriers to respectful, appropriate healthcare.
A range of new policies, including state laws attempting to limit access to gender-affirming care for minors, may further compound health disparities. However, in some states and at the federal level, protective laws seek to prohibit discrimination and support access to care. Meanwhile, the constitutional status of gender identity under the Equal Protection Clause, and the legality of certain federal protections challenged on various grounds, remain undecided. This Article offers a snapshot of this rapidly evolving legal landscape, as well as the challenges and opportunities it offers for the health of transgender, nonbinary, and other gender non-conforming people
RE-EXAMINING THE LANDSCAPE OF EMPLOYEE DRUG-TESTING IN MISSOURI POST-AMENDMENT 3
In November 2022, Missouri residents voted to ratify Amendment 3 to the state constitution and make the recreational use of marijuana legal. Yet, Missouri is one of only a few states that does not have protections for private employment drug testing. In this article, Paige Hume discusses the landscape of employment drug testing in Missouri, as well as the impact of the new amendment on workers.https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/lawjournalonline/1108/thumbnail.jp
That’s It? Scrutinizing the Marshal of the Supreme Court’s Role in an Investigation within the Context of 28 U.S.C. § 672
In May 2022, the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization majority opinion was leaked to the news outlet POLITICO. Very quickly thereafter, Chief Justice Roberts ordered the Marshal of the U.S. Supreme Court to investigate who was responsible for the leak. In this article, Josh Zoeller scrutinizes the Marshal’s report on the investigation while providing background on the Marshal’s role at the Court and how the position is statutorily defined.https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/lawjournalonline/1112/thumbnail.jp