Open Access-Zeitschriften an der WWU Münster (Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität)
Not a member yet
7390 research outputs found
Sort by
Altmann, Peter / Ueberschaer, Nadine / Ueberschaer, Frank (Hg.): Is It Good to Be Rich? Answers from the Bible and Antiquity
ByzRev 08.2026.006: Ayse Çaylak Türker, Byzantine Coins in Çanakkale Museum.: Research into the Early Christian and Byzantine Periods on the Valleys that Reached the Hellespont. Cham: Springer Nature 2025.
Ayse Çaylak Türker, Byzantine Coins in Çanakkale Museum. Research into the Early Christian and Byzantine Periods on the Valleys that Reached the Hellespont. Cham: Springer Nature 2025. XI, 298 pp. including 108 plates. – ISBN 978-3-031-99582-8 (print edition); 978-3-031-99583-58 (e-book
Central nervous system schwannoma, VGLL-fused (EWSR1::VGLL1 fusion) with neuroblastoma-like cell dense areas in the frontal lobe of a young man with schwannomatosis due to a germline LZTR1 mutation
We report a central nervous system schwannoma, VGLL-fused in a young man’s frontal lobe. Somatic abnormalities included an EWSR1::VGLL1 fusion, which incorporated the entire translated region of VGLL1, but excluded most domains of EWSR1. The tumor histologically merged with the brain, and showed both schwannoma-like and neuroblastoma-like areas. A germline LZTR1 mutation was subsequently identified, implying the patient suffered from schwannomatosis
A decision that sets a precedent? Parliamentary reservation for crosses – Note on VGH Munich, judgment of 8 July 2025, ref. 7 BV 21.336
Der Artikel setzt sich kritisch mit dem Urteil des Bayerischen Verwaltungsgerichtshofs vom 8. Juli 2025 auseinander, das die Weigerung der Schule zur Entfernung eines Kreuzes im Eingangsbereich eines staatlichen Gymnasiums als rechtswidrig bewertet. Es wird hervorgehoben, dass der VGH zentrale Aspekte des Falls – insbesondere die spezifische Konstellation schulischer Grundrechtsausübung und die staatlicheNeutralität – nur unzureichend berücksichtigt. Der Beitrag ordnet die Entscheidung in die bestehende verfassungsrechtliche und europarechtliche Judikatur ein und diskutiert die Verbindung zum Kruzifixerlass.The article critically examines the judgement of the Bavarian Administrative Court of 8 July 2025, which ruled that the refusal to remove a cross from the entrance area of a state grammar school was unlawful. The commentary emphasises that the Administrative Court did not sufficiently consider key aspects of the case, in particular the specific constellation of the exercise of fundamental rights in schools and the neutrality of the state. The article classifies the decision within existing constitutional and European case law and discusses the relation to the “Kruzifixerlass”