The Christie School of Oncology: Christie Research Publications Repository
Not a member yet
16373 research outputs found
Sort by
Exploring consent to use real-world data in lung cancer radiotherapy: decision of a citizens' jury for an 'informed opt-out' approach
No full textAn emerging approach to complement randomised controlled trial (RCT) data in the development of radiotherapy treatments is to use routinely collected 'real-world' data (RWD). RWD is the data collected as standard-of-care about all patients during their usual cancer care pathway. Given the nature of this data, important questions remain about the permissibility and acceptability of using RWD in routine practice. We involved and engaged with patients, carers and the public in a two-day citizens' jury to understand their views and obtain decisions regarding two key issues: (1) preferred approaches to consent for the use of RWD within the context of patients receiving radiotherapy for lung cancer in RAPID-RT and (2) how RWD use should be best communicated to patients. Individual views were polled using questionnaires at various stages of the jury, whilst group discussion activities prompted further dialogue about the rationale behind choices of consent. Key decisions obtained from the jury include: (1) an opt-out approach to consent for the use of RWD; (2) the opt-out approach to consent should be informed. Furthermore, it was advised that information and communication regarding the consent process and use of RWD should be accessible, clear and available in a variety of formats. It is important that the consent process for patient data use is underpinned by principles of autonomy and transparency with clear channels of communication between those asking for and giving consent. Moreover, the process of seeking consent from patients should be proportionate to the risks presented from their participation
Treating early-stage EGFR-positive lung adenocarcinoma in a pregnant patient: a case report
No full textBest Practice for Patient-centred Radiotherapy in Clinical Trials and BeyonddA National Multidisciplinary Consensus
No full textAims: Patient-centred radiotherapy refers to an approach where patients' needs and preferences are prioritised. Guidelines for this personalised approach are lacking. We present a multidisciplinary national consensus with the aim to provide recommendations for best practice in patient-centred radiotherapy for both clinical trials and routine practice. Materials and methods: A multidisciplinary working group was formed, comprising of healthcare professionals and patient advocates with lived experience of radiotherapy. Three interlinking themes were identified around patient-centred radiotherapy: information, decision-making, and outcomes. Scoping reviews were carried out for each theme, considering current challenges and recommendations for best practice. Recommendations were shaped through consultation with 12 patient advocates. Results: There is a pressing need to better support patients prior to, during, and following radiotherapy. Radiotherapy-related patient information is often complex and challenging to understand. Information resources should be cocreated with patient advocates and individualised wherever possible, including for patients from under-served groups. Shared decision-making (SDM) processes may enhance treatment satisfaction and reduce decision-regret, but these are not widely implemented. SDM requires prepared patients, trained teams, alongside adequate resources and should be offered as per patients' preferences. Healthcare system data offer complementary information to clinical trials, with the potential to provide additional insight into long-term benefits and risks of radiotherapy within 'real-world' conditions. Patient-reported outcome measures may provide greater insight regarding toxicity and impact on quality of life and should be used in synergy with clinician-reported outcomes. Outcome measures should be collected in the long term, and results should be widely disseminated to both the public and professional communities. Equity of access to radiotherapy, clinical trials, and survivorship services is a priority. Conclusion: Patients rightly expect more from healthcare professionals, and it is important that the radiotherapy community recognises this and embraces changes which will enhance patient-centred care. Our recommendations aim to guide best practice for patient-centred radiotherapy. (c) 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin lymphoma after first-line escalated beacopdac: Adverse outcomes are overcome by use of second-line targeted therapy-an international real-world analysis
No full textImpact of recent clinical trials on meta-analysis of stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine metastases and urgent call for consistent study endpoints
No full textPain from spinal metastases can result in significant impact to patients' quality of life. Conventional external beam radiation therapy (cEBRT) has long been shown to be effective in the pain control of patients with spinal metastases. With the advancement in radiation therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been increasingly adopted for the treatment of spinal metastases. Multiple randomised controlled trials (RCT) have been performed to evaluate whether SBRT provides better pain relief compared to cEBRT. Previous meta-analyses showed that SBRT have significantly better complete pain response at 3 months compared to cEBRT. This report updates meta-analyses by incorporating the complete pain response data obtained from personal communication with the NRG Oncology Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0631 principal investigator and the recently published RCT by Guckenberger et al. The results demonstrate that the results for complete pain response at 3 months have now changed and no longer favour SBRT. It is postulated that inconsistent definitions and reporting of study endpoints, specifically regarding vertebral compression fractures induced by radiation therapy, could be possible reasons for the difference in meta-analyses results. A consensus for standardizing study endpoints for future clinical trials in SBRT for painful bone metastases is needed to allow for better interpretation of study results
Evaluating cardiac substructure exposure and auto-contouring feasibility in paediatric patients treated with proton beam therapy
No full textFitness assessment in acute myeloid leukemia: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet
No full textFitness assessment in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is critical to deliver the right therapy to the right patient. Although several scoring systems are available to aid in determining fitness, the absence of validation studies has resulted in the lack of universally accepted assessment procedures. This limitation, combined with the increasing availability of novel agents expanding the spectrum of less-intensive options, has introduced additional complexity to the fitness assessment process. In this evolving context, fitness should reflect eligibility for a specific treatment among the several available, rather than a generic binary classification of eligibility for intensive chemotherapy. Moreover, the growing emphasis on patient-centered care, further highlights the importance of integrating quality of life, patient preferences, patient self-reported physical and social functioning status, social support, and early integration of palliative care into the assessment framework. A modern interpretation of fitness assessment should incorporate a comprehensive evaluation that extends beyond traditional clinical and biological disease characteristics. Thus, fitness assessment in patients with AML represents only 1 piece of a larger puzzle, encompassing the patient's overall capacity to sustain and benefit from a specific therapeutic program
