The Christie School of Oncology: Christie Research Publications Repository
Not a member yet
    16373 research outputs found

    Defining Benchmarks for Pelvic Exenteration Surgery: A Multicentre Analysis of Patients With Locally Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Cancers

    No full text
    Objective: To establish globally applicable benchmark outcomes for pelvic exenteration (PE) in patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer (LARC) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC), using outcomes achieved at highly specialised centres. Background: PE is established as the standard of care for selected patients with LARC and LRRC. There are currently no available benchmarks against which surgical performance in PE can be compared for audit and quality improvement. Methods: This international multicentre retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing PE for LARC or LRRC at 16 highly experienced centres between 2018 and 2023. Ten outcome benchmarks were established in a lower-risk subgroup. Benchmarks were defined by the 75th percentile of the results achieved at the individual centres. Results: Seven hundred sixty-three patients underwent PE, of which 464 patients (61%) had LARCs and 299 (39%) had LRRCs. Five hundred forty-four patients (71%) who met predefined lower-risk criteria formed the benchmark cohort. For patients with LARC, the calculated benchmark threshold for major complication rate was = 79%. For patients with LRRC, the calculated benchmark threshold for major complication rate was = 77%. Conclusions: The reported benchmarks for PE in patients with LARC and LRRC represent the best available care for this patient group globally and can be used for rigorous assessment of surgical quality and to facilitate quality improvement initiatives at international exenteration centres

    Risk stratification for endometrial cancer reveals independent contributions of polygenic risk and body mass index

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Obesity is a major risk factor for endometrial cancer, but it is unknown whether it impacts the association between genetic risk and endometrial cancer. We incorporated polygenic risk score and epidemiological risk factors in the prediction of and investigated associations of BMI and polygenic risk score with endometrial cancer risk. METHODS: We generated polygenic risk score for endometrial cancer in 129,829 unrelated female participants of European ancestry (including 956 incident cases with endometrial cancer) in the UK Biobank and predicted endometrial cancer using endometrial cancer polygenic risk score and established epidemiological risk factors, including BMI. We evaluated the performance of endometrial cancer prediction models by odds ratios and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) to using logistic regression. Individual and joint associations of BMI and polygenic risk score with endometrial cancer were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: An integrated model incorporating both polygenic risk score and epidemiological risk factors achieved a modest, but statistically significant, improvement in predicting endometrial cancer status compared with the model that included epidemiologic risk factors alone (AUC = 0.74 versus 0.73; P = 3.98 × 10(-5)). Obese participants (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2)) in the top polygenic risk tertile had the highest endometrial cancer risk. We observed independent effects of genetic risk and BMI on endometrial cancer risk. CONCLUSION: Integrating polygenic risk score with epidemiological risk factors may offer insights into population stratification for endometrial cancer susceptibility. Higher endometrial cancer polygenic risk is associated with endometrial cancer, irrespective of BMI

    Efficacy of adjuvant therapy in patients with stage IIIA cutaneous melanoma

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Patients with resected American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition (AJCC v8) stage IIIA melanoma have been underrepresented in clinical trials of adjuvant drug therapy. The benefit of adjuvant targeted therapy and immunotherapy in this population is unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicentre, retrospective study, patients with stage IIIA melanoma (AJCC v8) who received adjuvant pembrolizumab or nivolumab [anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)], BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy dabrafenib + trametinib (TT) or no adjuvant treatment [observation (OBS)] were included. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and toxicity rates were examined. RESULTS: A total of 628 patients from 34 centres across Australia, Europe and the United States were identified-256 in anti-PD-1, 80 in TT and 292 in OBS. The median follow-up was 2.6 years (interquartile range 1.6-3.4 years). The presence of some key poor prognostic variables was significantly higher in anti-PD-1 compared with OBS. The 2-year RFS was 79.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 74.1% to 84.8%] for anti-PD-1, 98.6% (95% CI 96.0% to 100%) for TT and 84.3% (95% CI 79.9% to 89.0%) for OBS. The 2-year DMFS was 88.4% (95% CI 84.3% to 92.8%) in anti-PD-1, 100% in TT and 91.1% (95% CI 87.7% to 94.7%) in OBS. Higher Breslow thickness and higher mitotic rate were associated with higher risk of recurrence in anti-PD-1 and OBS (P < 0.05). Rates of ≥grade 3 toxicities were 10.9% with anti-PD-1 and 17.5% with TT; discontinuation due to toxicity occurred in 13.3% and 21.2%, respectively. Rates of unresolved toxicity at last follow-up were 26.9% in the anti-PD-1 group and 12.5% in the TT group. CONCLUSIONS: Stage IIIA melanoma has a modest risk of recurrence. Adjuvant anti-PD-1 did not significantly improve RFS or DMFS compared with OBS alone. Adjuvant TT appears promising over anti-PD-1 or OBS. Outcomes after adjuvant therapy in this population needs further study in larger datasets with longer follow-up or prospective randomised trials

    Effect of MisMatch repair deficiency on metastasis occurrence in a syngeneic mouse model

    No full text
    Mismatch repair deficiency leads to high mutation rates and microsatellite instability (MSI-H), associated with immune infiltration and responsiveness to immunotherapies. In early stages, MSI-H tumors generally have a better prognosis and lower metastatic potential than microsatellite-stable (MSS) tumors, especially in colorectal cancer. However, in advanced stages, MSI-H tumors lose this survival advantage for reasons that remain unclear. We developed a syngeneic mouse model of MSI cancer by knocking out the MMR gene Msh2 in the metastatic 4T1 breast cancer cell line. This model mirrored genomic features of MSI-H cancers and showed reduction in metastatic incidence compared to their MSS counterparts. In MSI-H tumors, we observed an enrichment of immune gene-signatures that negatively correlated with metastasis incidence. A hybrid epithelial-mesenchymal signature, related to aggressiveness was detected only in metastatic MSI-H tumors. Interestingly, we identified immature myeloid cells at primary and metastatic sites in MSI-H tumor-bearing mice, suggesting that MMR deficiency elicits specific immune responses beyond T-cell activation

    OncoFlash-Research updates in a flash! (June 2025)

    No full text

    Small-cell lung cancer: anatomy of an immune-cold tumor

    No full text
    Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine (NE) tumor and a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) transformed the treatment of many other cancers but has so far failed to benefit all but a minority of SCLC patients who gain a modest increase in overall survival. Although SCLC is often considered to be 'immune-cold', there is no consensus mechanistic view on why most patients fail to respond to ICI therapy. We address this important question by reviewing recent genomic profiling studies that reveal a complex immune landscape. Each molecular subtype is associated with a unique pattern of immune infiltration and a program of cellular plasticity that involves loss of NE traits. This immunobiology presents a rapidly evolving case study in mechanisms of ICI response and resistance. We discuss recent developments, present new hypotheses, and explore future directions for the field

    A phase III randomized study of first-line NUC-1031/cisplatin vs. gemcitabine/cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer

    No full text
    BACKGROUND & AIMS: The previous first-line standard of care for advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC), gemcitabine/cisplatin, has modest efficacy. NUC-1031 is a phosphoramidate modification of gemcitabine. We report final analyses of the NuTide:121 study, designed to compare the efficacy of NUC-1031/cisplatin to gemcitabine/cisplatin in aBTC. METHODS: In this open-label, multicenter study, adult patients with treatment-naïve aBTC were randomized (1:1) to NUC-1031/cisplatin (n = 388) or gemcitabine/cisplatin (n = 385) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles until disease progression or intolerance. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (blinded independent central review). Three interim analyses (IA) and a final analysis were planned. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were balanced; median age 65 years, 53% male, primary tumors: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) (54%), extrahepatic CCA (21%), gallbladder cancer (21%) and ampullary cancer (5%). Enrollment stopped at IA1 as the OS futility boundary was crossed. At final data cut-off, median OS for NUC-1031/cisplatin vs. gemcitabine/cisplatin was 9.2 months (95% CI 8.3-10.4) vs. 12.6 months (95% CI 11.0-15.1) (HR 1.79) and median PFS was 4.9 months (95% CI 4.4-6.0) vs. 6.4 months (95% CI 6.1-7.4) (HR 1.45). Objective response rate was higher for NUC-1031/cisplatin (18.7% vs. 12.4%; OR: 1.59; p = 0.049). The adverse event profile was similar between arms, except for hepatobiliary disorders (25% vs. 11%; higher with NUC-1031/cisplatin) and hematological events (48% vs. 65%; higher with gemcitabine/cisplatin). More patients met criteria for potential drug-induced liver injury (27% vs. 7%) and Hy's law (1.6% vs. 0.5%) with NUC-1031/cisplatin. Treatment exposure was lower for NUC-1031/cisplatin, likely due to early discontinuation for AEs (30% vs. 18%). CONCLUSIONS: NuTide:121 was terminated early due to futility. NUC-1031/cisplatin did not set a new standard in first-line aBTC. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Although clinical practice guidelines identified gemcitabine plus cisplatin as standard of care for advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC) based on clinical studies, the modest efficacy observed with this regimen highlighted the urgent need for more effective therapies. NuTide:121, one of the largest randomized interventional studies conducted in the first-line aBTC population to date, compared the combination of cisplatin with NUC-1031, a phosphoramidate form of gemcitabine, with the standard of care regimen. Despite a higher response rate in the NUC-1031/cisplatin arm, the study was terminated early based on a futility assessment for OS. Early toxicity and in particular liver injury likely contributed to the regimen's failure. This study emphasized some important challenges in study design and further confirmed the difficulties of advancing treatment options in this vulnerable patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04163900

    0

    full texts

    16,373

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    The Christie School of Oncology: Christie Research Publications Repository
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇