Brage Nord Open Research Archive
Not a member yet
8812 research outputs found
Sort by
Improving the quality of nursing care through standardized nursing languages: Call to action across European countries
Get PDFAuthor’s accepted manuscript (postprint).This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Elsevier in International Journal of Medical Informatics on 19/9/2024.Available online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105627acceptedVersio
Municipal Procurement: Routine Gaps, Competence Challenges, and Resource Scarcity Impact Cost Control and Increase Transaction Costs
Get PDFMBA i strategi og ledelse - Nord universitet 202
What alternative strategies can a medium-sized architecture firm adopt to address the challenges and opportunities presented by Generative AI?
No full textMBA i strategi og ledelse - Nord universitet 202
Shared situational awareness between the levels of administration - MS Viking Sky
No full textMasteroppgave i beredskap og kriseledelse - Nord universitet 202
Funksjons- og oppgavedeling i Helse Nord – mer enn bare helse?
Get PDFMasteroppgave i helseledelse (EMBA) - Nord universitet 202
Grounding and Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics
Get PDFFabrice Correia and Benjamin Schnieder suggest that Aristotle’s account of formal causation in the Posterior Analytics is a type of grounding. While there are many similarities, I will argue that what Aristotle had in mind differs from contemporary standard accounts of grounding. First, I give a brief account of formal causation as presented in the Posterior Analytics. Second, I show that formal causation differs from grounding in at least two crucial respects. (1) Formal causation involves a priority relation between different ontological categories, namely, states of affairs and substantial forms. In allowing for transcategorial grounding, Aristotle’s theory is similar to that of Jonathan Schaffer and Bernard Bolzano. (2) Formal causation is not transitive, both because there are no chains of formal causes, and because Aristotle is interested only in the full and ultimate, yet at the same time immediate, ground. There are two further differences: Aristotle does not think that a conjunction is always grounded in its conjuncts, nor that a universal quantification is always grounded in its instances. His theory is in some sense narrower than grounding, in that it allows only for full immediate grounds. In another sense it is closer to truthmaking, both in that truthmaking is transcategorial and that it does not allow for chains. However, Aristotle’s formal cause should rather be seen as a “beingmaker,” since truthmaking has to do with linguistic entities and truthbearers. Aristotle’s formal cause thus fits well into the framework of grounding, as an immediate full ground, but fits poorly with the standard claims about grounding.acceptedVersio
Absorption and pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine after bilateral topical administration in tonsillar fossae for posttonsillectomy pain relief
Get PDFpublishedVersio
Rehabilitering med m-helse. Personer med sykelig overvekt og fagpersoner sine erfaringer med bruk av mobilapplikasjon som virkemiddel i rehabiliteringsforløpet
Get PDFMasteroppgave i helsevitenskap - 202
Small steps in all directions: Exploring localisation of the Sustainable Development Goals in Norway
Get PDFDoctoral thesis (PhD) – Nord University, 2024publishedVersio
