Royal Devon and Exeter Research Repository
Not a member yet
4351 research outputs found
Sort by
The impact of the massive open online course C19_SPACE during the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical knowledge enhancement: a study among medical doctors and nurses
No full textPURPOSE: During the initial phase of the pandemic, healthcare professionals faced difficulties due to the limited availability of comprehensive learning resources on managing patients affected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The COVID-19 Skills Preparation Course (C19_SPACE) was tailored to meet the overwhelming demand for specialized training. The primary objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and impact of this program on enhancing clinical knowledge and to identify factors affecting this improvement. METHODS: As part of the project, data were collected prospectively to measure the baseline knowledge. After the descriptive statistics, multiple and multivariate logistic regression models were executed to identify the factors associated with knowledge increase. RESULTS: The final sample included 3140 medical doctors (MDs) and 3090 nurses (RNs). For the primary analysis, the mean value of the baseline knowledge test score of MDs was 62.41 (standard deviation, SD = 13.48), and it significantly (p < 0.001) increased to 84.65 (SD = 11.95). Factors influencing overall knowledge scores were female sex (AOR = 1.34 [1.04-1.73]), being a specialist qualified for intensive care medicine (adjusted odds ratio, AOR = 0.56, [0.33-0.96]), and performance on the pre-test (AOR = 0.91, [0.90-0.92]). As for the RNs, the mean value of the total knowledge score was 63.25 (SD = 13.53), which significantly (p < 0.001) increased to 81.51 (SD = 14.21). Factor associated with knowledge was performance on the pre-test (AOR = 0.92 [0.92-0.93]). CONCLUSIONS: C19_SPACE effectively increased the clinical knowledge of doctors and nurses. The effect was more pronounced in the program's target group of healthcare workers with less experience in the intensive care unit (ICU). Other factors associated with knowledge enhancement were sex and being a specialist in intensive care.Journal content freely available via Open Access. Some content may be unavailable due to publisher embargo. Click on the 'Additional link' above to access the full-text
Congenital hyperinsulinism in the Ukraine: a 10-year national study
No full textINTRODUCTION: Congenital Hyperinsulinism (CHI) has not been previously studied in Ukraine. We therefore aimed to elucidate the genetics, clinical phenotype, histological subtype, treatment and long-term outcomes of Ukrainian patients with CHI. METHODS: Forty-one patients with CHI were recruited to the Ukrainian national registry between the years 2014-2023. Genetic testing (n=40), 18F-fluorodihydroxyphenylalanin and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging followed by surgical treatment and subsequent histological analysis (n=19) was performed through international collaboration. RESULTS: Pathogenic variants were identified in 19/22 (86.3%) individuals with persistent CHI (p-CHI) and 8/18 (44.4%) with early remission CHI (er-CHI). Pathogenic variants in the K-ATP channel genes were the only identified genetic cause of p-CHI (ABCC8 (n=17) and KCNJ11 (n=2)) with greater genetic heterogeneity observed in those with er-CHI (ABCC8 (n=3), KMT2D (Kabuki Syndrome, n=1), Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (n=2) and INSR (Donohue syndrome (n=2)). Histological analysis performed on 19 children with persistent CHI confirmed focal disease in 14 (73.7%), diffuse disease in two (10.5%) and atypical histology in three (15.8%). After surgery, complete recovery was observed in all 14 with focal disease, while relapse occurred in three patients with diffuse or atypical histology. CONCLUSION: A genetic diagnosis was achieved for 67.5% (27/40) of the cohort with a higher pick-up rate observed in those with p-CHI. The genetics and imaging studies enabled subtype-targeted treatment with surgical cure achieved in all individuals with focal disease.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.Journal content freely available via Open Access. Some content may be unavailable due to publisher embargo. Click on the 'Additional link' above to access the full-text
Survival outcomes fifteen years after minimally invasive esophagectomy
No full textBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIO) offers a less traumatic resection for cancer patients resulting in improved quality of life. Concerns about the oncological efficacy of the procedure and potential impact on survival may have limited its wider adoption. This study reports survival outcomes fifteen years after patients underwent a total MIO for esophageal cancer. METHODS: A single-centre analysis of survival outcomes was conducted on all patients who underwent MIO between 2004 and 2010 and had completed at least 15-years follow-up. Actual overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier method. The pattern of association of patient factors with survival was assessed with the Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients underwent resection, with 4 (3.3%) in-patient deaths. With a median follow-up time of 15.2 years, the median OS was 41 months. At 15-years there were 20 survivors (17.1%), with numbers at 10 and 5 years being 34 (29.1%) and 45 (38.5%) respectively. Median DFS was 27 months, with 19 (16.2%) patient disease free at 15 years, and 32 (27.4%) and 38 (32.5%) at 10 and 5 years respectively. Predictors of poor survival were the intracorporeal fashioning of the gastric conduit, perioperative blood transfusions, advanced disease stage and recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Long term survival outcomes following MIO support its increasing recognition as the standard of care as for curative resection in esophageal cancer.Not hel
The use of faecal microbiota transplant as treatment for recurrent or refractory Clostridioides difficile infection and other potential indications: second edition of joint British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Healthcare Infection Society (HIS) guidelines
No full textThe first British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Healthcare Infection Society (HIS)-endorsed faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) guidelines were published in 2018. Over the past 5 years, there has been considerable growth in the evidence base (including publication of outcomes from large national FMT registries), necessitating an updated critical review of the literature and a second edition of the BSG/HIS FMT guidelines. These have been produced in accordance with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence-accredited methodology, thus have particular relevance for UK-based clinicians, but are intended to be of pertinence internationally. This second edition of the guidelines have been divided into recommendations, good practice points and recommendations against certain practices. With respect to FMT for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), key focus areas centred around timing of administration, increasing clinical experience of encapsulated FMT preparations and optimising donor screening. The latter topic is of particular relevance given the COVID-19 pandemic, and cases of patient morbidity and mortality resulting from FMT-related pathogen transmission. The guidelines also considered emergent literature on the use of FMT in non-CDI settings (including both gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal indications), reviewing relevant randomised controlled trials. Recommendations are provided regarding special areas (including compassionate FMT use), and considerations regarding the evolving landscape of FMT and microbiome therapeutics.Published version, accepted version, submitted versionJournal content freely available via Open Access. Some content may be unavailable due to publisher embargo. Click on the 'Additional link' above to access the full-text
Effect of parental touch on relieving acute procedural pain in neonates and parental anxiety (Petal): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in the UK
No full textBACKGROUND: Touch interventions such as massage and skin-to-skin contact relieve neonatal pain. The Parental touch trial (Petal) aimed to assess whether parental stroking of their baby before a clinically required heel lance, at a speed of approximately 3 cm/s to optimally activate C-tactile nerve fibres, provides effective pain relief. METHODS: Petal is a multicentre, randomised, parallel-group interventional superiority trial conducted in the John Radcliffe Hospital (Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK) and the Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital (Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK). Neonates without neurological abnormalities who were born at 35 weeks gestational age or more and required a blood test via a heel lance in the first week of life were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive parental touch for 10 s either before (intervention group) or after (control group) the clinically required heel lance. Randomisation was managed at the Oxford site using a web-based minimisation algorithm with allocation concealment. The primary outcome measure was the magnitude of noxious-evoked brain activity in response to the heel lance measured with electroencephalography (EEG). Secondary outcome measures were Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R) score, development of tachycardia, and parental anxiety score. For all outcomes, the per-protocol effect was estimated via complier average causal effect analysis on the full analysis set. The trial is registered on ISRCTN (ISRCTN14135962) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04901611). FINDINGS: Between Sept 1, 2021, and Feb 7, 2023, 159 parents were approached to participate in the study, and 112 neonates were included. 56 neonates were randomly assigned to the intervention group of parental stroking before the heel lance and 56 to the control group of parental stroking after the heel lance. The mean of the magnitude of the heel lance-evoked brain activity was 0·85 arbitrary units (a.u.; SD 0·70; n=39; a scaled magnitude of 1 a.u. represents the expected mean response to a heel lance in term-aged neonates) in the intervention group and 0·91 a.u. (SD 0·76; n=43) in the control group. Therefore, the primary outcome did not differ significantly between groups, with a mean difference of -0·11 a.u. (lower in intervention group; SD 0·77; 95% CI -0·42 to 0·20; p=0·38; n=82). No significant difference was observed across secondary outcomes. The PIPP-R difference in means was 1·10 (higher in intervention group, 95% CI -0·42 to 2·61; p=0·15; n=100); the odds ratio of becoming tachycardic was 2·08 (95% CI 0·46 to 9·46; p=0·34, n=105) in the intervention group with reference to the control group; and the difference in parental State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State score was -0·44 (higher in control group; SD 6·85; 95% CI -2·91 to 2·02; p=0·72; n=106). One serious adverse event (desaturation) occurred in a neonate randomly assigned to the control group, which was not considered to be related to the study. INTERPRETATION: Parental stroking delivered at an optimal speed to activate C-tactile fibres for a duration of 10 s before the painful procedure did not significantly change neonates' magnitude of pain-related brain activity, PIPP-R score, or development of tachycardia. The trial highlighted the challenge of translating an experimental researcher-led tactile intervention into a parent-led approach, and the value of involving parents in their baby's pain management. FUNDING: Wellcome Trust and Bliss.Published version, accepted versionThe article is available via Open Access. Click on the 'Additional link' above to access the full-text
Healthcare professional views about a prehospital redirection pathway for stroke thrombectomy: a multiphase deductive qualitative study
No full textBACKGROUND: Mechanical thrombectomy for stroke is highly effective but time-critical. Delays are common because many patients require transfer between local hospitals and regional centres. A two-stage prehospital redirection pathway consisting of a simple ambulance screen followed by regional centre assessment to select patients for direct admission could optimise access. However, implementation might be challenged by the limited number of thrombectomy providers, a lack of prehospital diagnostic tests for selecting patients and whether finite resources can accommodate longer ambulance journeys plus greater central admissions. We undertook a three-phase, multiregional, qualitative study to obtain health professional views on the acceptability and feasibility of a new pathway. METHODS: Online focus groups/semistructured interviews were undertaken designed to capture important contextual influences. We purposively sampled NHS staff in four regions of England. Anonymised interview transcripts underwent deductive thematic analysis guided by the NASSS (Non-adoption, Abandonment and Challenges to Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability, Implementation) Implementation Science framework. RESULTS: Twenty-eight staff participated in 4 focus groups, 2 group interviews and 18 individual interviews across 4 Ambulance Trusts, 5 Hospital Trusts and 3 Integrated Stroke Delivery Networks (ISDNs). Five deductive themes were identified: (1) (suspected) stroke as a condition, (2) the pathway change, (3) the value participants placed on the proposed pathway, (4) the possible impact on NHS organisations/adopter systems and (5) the wider healthcare context. Participants perceived suspected stroke as a complex scenario. Most viewed the proposed new thrombectomy pathway as beneficial but potentially challenging to implement. Organisational concerns included staff shortages, increased workflow and bed capacity. Participants also reported wider socioeconomic issues impacting on their services contributing to concerns around the future implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Positive views from health professionals were expressed about the concept of a proposed pathway while raising key content and implementation challenges and useful 'real-world' issues for consideration.Published version, accepted version, submitted versionRDUH staff can access the full-text of this article by clicking on the 'Additional Link' above and logging in with NHS OpenAthens if prompted
Editor's choice - January 2024
No full textAccepted version (12 month embargo)RD&E staff can access the full-text of this article by clicking on the 'Additional Link' above and logging in with NHS OpenAthens if prompted
Patient Initiated Follow-Up (PIFU): how can rheumatology departments start to reap the benefits? A consensus document
No full textPatient Initiated Follow-Up (PIFU) is gaining momentum in the NHS, aiming to optimize outpatient care amidst rising service demands. PIFU is valuable in rheumatology, where the increasing demand for ongoing management exacerbates the patient backlog. Importantly, PIFU has demonstrated comparable safety and outcomes to traditional care in numerous studies. PIFU empowers patients, drives personalized care, increases efficiency, and has the potential to reduce waiting lists by allowing services to focus on new and acute cases. Effective PIFU implementation includes careful selection of patients, educating patients and healthcare staff, well defined operational guidelines, and robust remote monitoring. Digital solutions can enhance PIFU through patient education, active remote monitoring and streamlined escalation. Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Measures (ePROMs) provide a suitable and safe metric to monitor patients remotely. Given the potential benefits, outpatient departments should consider investing in PIFU as a solution to current healthcare delivery challenges and as a means for future proofing clinical systems against increasing service demands.Journal content freely available via Open Access. Some content may be unavailable due to publisher embargo. Click on the 'Additional link' above to access the full-text
Cost-utility analysis of ferric derisomaltose versus ferric carboxymaltose in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and iron deficiency anemia in England
No full textAIMS: Anemia is the most common extraintestinal complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with approximately half of cases caused by iron deficiency (ID). Intravenous iron is the preferred ID anemia (IDA) treatment where oral iron is contraindicated, ineffective or not tolerated, or where ID correction is urgent. The objective was to evaluate the cost-utility of ferric derisomaltose (FDI) versus ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) in patients with IBD and IDA in England, in whom IV iron treatment is preferred. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A patient-level simulation model was developed, capturing quality of life (QoL) differences based on SF-36v2 data from the PHOSPHARE-IBD randomized controlled trial, monitoring and incidence of post-infusion hypophosphatemia, and number of iron infusions required. Analyses were conducted over a five-year time horizon from the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) perspective, with healthcare provider and societal perspectives adopted in separate analyses. Future costs and effects were discounted at 3.5% per annum and one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: FDI increased quality-adjusted life expectancy by 0.075 QALYs versus FCM from 2.57 QALYs to 2.65 QALYs per patient. Patients receiving FDI required 1.63 fewer iron infusions over the five-year time horizon, driving infusion-related cost savings of GBP 496 per patient (GBP 2,188 versus GBP 1,692) from the DHSC perspective. Costs of monitoring and treating hypophosphatemia after FCM were GBP 226, yielding total savings of GBP 722 per patient (GBP 2,414 versus GBP 1,692) over the five-year time horizon. FDI also led to reduced costs versus FCM in the societal and provider analyses and was therefore the dominant intervention across all three perspectives. LIMITATIONS: The analysis did not capture patient adherence, hypophosphatemic osteomalacia, or fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Results showed that FDI improved patient QoL and reduced direct healthcare expenditure versus FCM in patients with IBD and IDA in England.
Ferric derisomaltose (FDI) is an intravenous iron approved for the treatment of clinically diagnosed iron deficiency in the United Kingdom (UK), and can be an important therapeutic option for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), who require regular and rapid iron replenishment. Ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) is the sole alternative intravenous iron formulation available in the UK, but is associated with reduced blood phosphate levels, potentially causing fatigue and weakening of the bones. We conducted an economic analysis to weigh the costs and clinical outcomes associated with FDI and FCM in the UK, for patients with IBD and iron deficiency anemia (IDA). The main clinical difference we investigated was reduced blood phosphate levels, which occurred more often after FCM than FDI. We also incorporated recent quality of life data from a clinical study, and calculated the number of infusions (and associated costs) of each iron formulation, that patients would require over five years. Clinical data were obtained from published medical literature, while cost data came from UK sources including the 2022/2023 National Tariff Payment System and the British National Formulary. Our model showed that FDI was associated with quality of life improvements, fewer overall infusions per treatment course, and reduced costs compared to FCM, from the English Department of Health and Social Care perspective, the societal perspective, and the perspective of individual healthcare providers (namely NHS Trusts) within NHS England. FDI is therefore likely to represent the best value intravenous iron for the treatment of IDA with IBD in the UK.
engPublished versionSupports Open Acces
Type 1 diabetes genetic risk score variation across ancestries using whole genome sequencing and array-based approaches
No full textA Type 1 Diabetes Genetic Risk Score (T1DGRS) aids diagnosis and prediction of Type 1 Diabetes (T1D). While traditionally derived from imputed array genotypes, Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) provides a more direct approach and is now increasingly used in clinical and research studies. We investigated the concordance between WGS-based and array-based T1DGRS across genetic ancestries in 149,265 UK Biobank participants using WGS, TOPMed-imputed, and 1000 Genomes-imputed array genotypes. In the overall cohort, WGS-based T1DGRS demonstrated strong correlation with TOPMed-imputed array-based score (r = 0.996, average WGS-based score 0.0028 standard deviations (SD) lower, p < 10(- 31)), while showing lower correlation with 1000 Genomes-imputed array-based scores (r = 0.981, 0.043 SD lower in WGS, p < 10(- 300)). Ancestry-stratified analyses between WGS-based and TOPMed-imputed array-based score showed the highest correlation with European ancestry (r = 0.996, 0.044 SD lower in WGS, p < 10(- 300)) followed by African ancestry (r = 0.989, 0.0193 SD lower in WGS, p < 10(- 14)) and South Asian ancestry (r = 0.986, 0.0129 SD lower in WGS, p < 10 (- 6)). These differences were more pronounced when comparing WGS based score with 1000 Genomes-imputed array-based scores (r = 0.982, 0.975, 0.957 for European, South Asian, African respectively). Population-level analysis using WGS-based T1DGRS revealed significant ancestry-based stratification, with European ancestry individuals showing the highest scores, followed by South Asian (average 0.28 SD lower than Europeans, p < 10(- 58)) and African ancestry individuals (average 0.89 SD lower than Europeans, p < 10(- 300)). Notably, when applying the European ancestry-derived 90(th) centile risk threshold, only 0.71% (95% CI 0.41-1.13) of African ancestry individuals and 6.4% (95% CI 5.6-7.2) of South Asian individuals were identified as high-risk, substantially below the expected 10%. In conclusion, while WGS is viable for generating T1DGRS, with TOPMed-imputed genotypes offering a cost-effective alternative, the persistence of ancestry-based variations in T1DGRS distribution even using whole genome sequencing emphasises the need for ancestry-specific or pan-ancestry standards in clinical practice.Journal content freely available via Open Access. Some content may be unavailable due to publisher embargo. Click on the 'Additional link' above to access the full-text