Sussex Research Online

University of Sussex

Sussex Research Online
Not a member yet
    260851 research outputs found

    Impact, barriers, and facilitators of blood culture diversion devices to reduce blood culture contamination and improve patient safety: a scoping review

    No full text
    Blood culture contamination (BCC) is a frequent and costly challenge in clinical diagnostics. BCC leads to extended hospital stays, unnecessary antimicrobial therapy, diagnostic delays, and increased healthcare costs, sometimes exceeding $100,000 per case depending on the scope of analysis. It also contributes to environmental waste and reputational harm. Blood culture diversion (BCD), particularly via blood culture diversion devices (BCDDs), has emerged as a promising strategy to reduce BCC. BCDDs divert initial blood flow, likely contaminated with skin flora, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy. This scoping review analysed 23 studies, including randomised controlled trials and observational designs. BCD was an effective method to reduce the rate of BCC. BCDDs consistently outperformed open diversion methods in reducing BCC rates. However, findings on their impact on antimicrobial usage, hospital length of stay, and cost-effectiveness varied. Some studies reported significant cost savings and reduced vancomycin use, while others showed minimal change. Barriers to BCDD adoption include financial constraints, inconsistent definitions of BCC, and variable staff compliance. Enablers include positive user feedback, targeted training, and integration into national surveillance frameworks. Evidence gaps remain in comparative effectiveness, sustainability metrics, and behavioural factors influencing implementation. The review recommends broader adoption of BCDDs, particularly in high-risk settings, emphasising the need for local data to identify where implementation will be most effective. It also calls for standardised definitions, improved surveillance, and further research into broader clinical, economic, and environmental outcomes.</p

    The interplay of knowledge distance, linguistic distance, and industry relatedness in foreign divestment

    No full text
    This paper extends our understanding of the link between foreign divestment and knowledge distance between the home and host countries. We consider how knowledge distance affects the MNEs decision to divest their foreign operations. We theorize and find evidence that, given the embedded nature of knowledge in a given context, MNEs aiming to source knowledge in a foreign country characterised by a high level of knowledge distance will be less likely to divest their operations in these countries. Elaborating on a firm's ability to leverage knowledge distance, we also consider how linguistic distance positively moderates the relationship between knowledge distance and foreign divestment. Results from a comprehensive panel of 1,718 foreign subsidiaries made by 255 manufacturing Finnish MNEs operating in 70 host countries reveal robust support for these arguments.</p

    0

    full texts

    260,851

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    Sussex Research Online is based in United Kingdom
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇