Archivio della ricerca della Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna
Not a member yet
26957 research outputs found
Sort by
[Diagnostic-therapeutic care pathways for patients with cardiac amyloidosis - SIC/ANMCO Consensus document. Edited by the Italian Cardiac Amyloidosis Network (RIAC)]
No full textUn primo bilancio della riforma dell'art. 9 Cost. La tutela degli animali di fronte agli altri valori costituzionali
No full text
Hannah Arendt. Spazio Pubblico e Giudizio politico
No full textNel saggio l'autrice ripercorre, attraverso questioni teoriche, le scansioni attraverso cui Arendt elabora la propria concezione politica del Giudizio riflettente estetico, inteso come criterio orientativo e interpretativo dell'azione nello spazio pubblico, in un dialogo serrato con Jaspers interprete di Kan
European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Standard Operating Procedure for the development of guidelines
No full textThe European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) has developed a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the development of clinical practice guidelines, ensuring adherence to rigorous methodological standards based on the principles of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Key components include a transparent process for managing conflicts of interest, the incorporation of multidisciplinary panels including individuals with lived experience of diabetes, an evidence synthesis based on comprehensive systematic reviews, and an explicit peer review process. This SOP delineates the roles and responsibilities of the main structures involved, including the Guidelines Oversight Committee, Guideline Development Panels, and Evidence Synthesis Teams. Additionally, the SOP describes the main stages in guideline development, namely scoping of the guideline topic, evidence synthesis, development of Evidence-to-Decision frameworks for the formulation of clear, patient-centred recommendations, writing of the guideline document and the review process
Victim Status and Locus Standi Before the European Court of Human Rights in Climate Change Cases: Where Next?
No full textIn Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v Switzerland, the European Court of Human Rights articulated a novel and tailored approach to addressing climate change within the framework of the European Convention on Human Rights. The Court’s assessment of the applicants’ victim status and locus standi revealed tensions between the structural features of the Convention system and the unique challenges posed by climate change, leading to a compromise approach that has sparked significant debate. This article contributes to the ongoing discussion by proposing an alternative interpretation of the victim requirement and locus standi in climate change cases such as KlimaSeniorinnen. By highlighting the role of particularly vulnerable groups as victims and of associations as their most appropriate representatives, the proposed approach aims to value the inherently collective and preventive nature of human rights-based climate change litigation while avoiding too rapid a departure from the established system of protection under the Convention
Danni da farmaci: commistione tra regimi di responsabilità e allocazione del rischio da sviluppo
No full textLa sentenza n. 8224 del 28 marzo 2025 della Corte di Cassazione offre importanti chiarimenti sul rapporto tra la disciplina consumeristica in materia di responsabilità del produttore e le norme del codice civile (art. 2050) nel caso di danno da farmaco, censurando l’impropria commistione tra regimi di responsabilità. Su queste basi, il contributo riprende la questione della coesistenza tra regimi di responsabilità, per poi concentrarsi sulla diversa allocazione del rischio da sviluppo nei due sistemi e sulla rilevanza dell’aspetto informativo
Impact of glomerular filtration rate estimation formulas on MECKI score performance and prognostic accuracy in heart failure: the MECKI-RENAL study
No full textEU Data protection liability: the exemption clause ex art. 82 under the European Court of Justice interpretation and the limits of harmonisation
No full textThis research examines the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on the liability regime for unlawful data processing under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). In particular, it focuses on the exemption clause provided for in art. 82(3) GDPR. Starting with judgment C-300/21, the CJEU has interpreted the terms and concepts contained in art. 82 GDPR as autonomous concepts of European Union law. This attempt at harmonisation is one of the few in the field of civil liability, which has traditionally been left to the competence of EU Member States. However, the GDPR does not provide all the elements necessary to establish the liability of data controllers. Building on this gap, this research explores the appropriate methodology to support the harmonisation process initiated by the GDPR, namely comparative law, and examines the doctrines of private law relevant to the attribution of civil liability in the realm of data protection