81690 research outputs found
Sort by
Study of Evaluation Method for Hydrogen Embrittlement of High-Strength Steel Sheets for Actual Use in Automotive [an abstract of dissertation and a summary of dissertation review]
No full text
Studies on the immunological behavior of early graft-infiltrating lymphocytes in a mouse model of skin transplantation [an abstract of entire text]
No full textこの博士論文全文の閲覧方法については、以下のサイトをご参照ください。配架番号：2823https://www.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/dissertations/copy-guides
Improvement of glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction by switching from liraglutide or dulaglutide to subcutaneous semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes; A multicentre, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparison study
Get PDF配架番号：283
Studies on neuroprotective effects of a hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier (stroma-free hemoglobin nanoparticle) for ischemia reperfusion injury
Get PDF(Un)comparable classifications of Ainu dialects : Reconsidering statistical dialect classification from the similarity judgments
No full text服部・知里（1960）とAsai（1974）は、基礎語彙データへの統計学の応用によってアイヌ語方言の分類を試みた研究である。しかし、それらは異なる項目に対して異なる類似判断を適用していたため、の分類結果は比較不可能であった。特に、長らく不明となっていた Asai（1974）が対象とした項目と大半の類似判断は、Ono（2020）のアルゴリズムと小野・深澤（2023）によってようやく明らかにされた。本研究では、Asai（1974）の110項目に対して服部・知里（1960）とAsai（1974）の類似判断を適用し、類似判断の違いがアイヌ語方言の統計的分類に与える影響を比較検討した。分析の結果、服部・知里（1960）からは「沙流・千歳（・樺太）型」が、Asai（1974）からは「東西型」の分類が得られた。人文学において、分類目的と類似判断の整合性を当該分野の知見から明確に検討する必要性が示された。Hattori and Chiri (1960) and Asai (1974) applied statistics to basic lexical items of Ainu and attempted to classify the dialects. However, their classifications were not comparable because they applied different judgments of similarity to their lexical items. Asai’s (1974) similarity judgments and lexical items, which had been unknown for a long time, were finally clarified by Ono’s (2020) algorithm and Ono and Fukazawa (2023). In this study, we applied the similarity judgments of Hattori and Chiri (1960) and Asai (1974) to 110 basic items used in Asai (1974) and compared the effects of the judgments on the statistical classification of Ainu dialects. As a result, the “Saru-Chitose (and Sakhalin) type” was obtained from Hattori and Chiri (1960), and the “East-West type” from Asai (1974). The humanities as well as linguistics would also need to clarify the consistency between the purpose of classification and the judgments of similarity
