122 research outputs found
vanSchie_Leer_Open_Practices_Disclosure – Supplemental material for Lateral Eye Movements Do Not Increase False-Memory Rates: A Failed Direct-Replication Study
No full textSupplemental material, vanSchie_Leer_Open_Practices_Disclosure for Lateral Eye Movements Do Not Increase False-Memory Rates: A Failed Direct-Replication Study by Kevin van Schie and Arne Leer in Clinical Psychological Science</p
De kunst van het gemotiveerd vergeten
No full textEen heftige ruzie met een goede vriend, het voorbijgaan van een relatie of het overlijden van een dierbare door een vreselijk ongeluk; slechts een greep uit de gebeurtenissen die de meeste mensen het liefst zouden willen vergeten, of in ieder geval de pijnlijke details. Maar kunnen we onze eigen herinneringen doelbewust vergeten, ook als ze traumatisch zijn
Snelheid doet er toe: Snelheid van oogbewegingen en individuele verschillen bij het vervagen van emotionele herinneringen.
No full text
Snelheid doet er toe: Snelheid van oogbewegingen en individuele verschillen bij het vervagen van emotionele herinneringen.
No full text
Lateral Eye Movements Do Not Increase False Memory Rates: A Failed Direct Replication Study
No full textDual-task interventions reduce vividness and unpleasantness in both old and new memories
No full textA core element of EMDR therapy is that a patient recalls a traumatic memory while concurrently making horizontal eye movements. Experimental studies show that performing such tasks simultaneously (i.e., Recall + Dual-Task) reduces the memory's vividness and unpleasantness. Memory age may act as a boundary condition on this effect as older memories have been more consolidated and strengthened over time compared to more recently formed memories, making older memories less susceptible to change. To investigate this, participants (N = 195) in Experiment 1 recalled an old or a new negative autobiographical memory and were randomly assigned to a Recall + Dual-Task intervention or a Recall Only intervention. Before, during, and after the intervention the memory was rated on vividness and unpleasantness. In Experiment 2 (N = 356) a follow-up rating was added one day later to test for delayed effects of memory age on intervention effectiveness. Collectively, the two experiments show that Recall + Dual-Task immediately reduces memory vividness and unpleasantness compared to Recall Only. For unpleasantness this differential effect remained one day later. However, none of the effects were moderated by memory age. Thus, these findings suggest that memory age is not a boundary condition for dual-task effectiveness and that dual-task interventions (as used in EMDR) could be similarly effective for reducing the intensity of emotional memories of different ages
- …
