255 research outputs found
sj-pdf-1-pps-10.1177_17456916211053319 – Supplemental material for The Cooperation Databank: Machine-Readable Science Accelerates Research Synthesis
Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-pps-10.1177_17456916211053319 for The Cooperation Databank: Machine-Readable Science Accelerates Research Synthesis by Giuliana Spadaro, Ilaria Tiddi, Simon Columbus, Shuxian Jin, Annette ten Teije, CoDa Team and Daniel Balliet in Perspectives on Psychological Science</p
Conformance Analysis of the Execution of Clinical Guidelines with Basic Medical Knowledge and Clinical Terminology
Identifying Disease-Centric Subdomains in Very Large Medical Ontologies: A Case-Study on Breast Cancer Concepts in SNOMED CT. Or: Finding 2500 Out of 300.000
Modern medical vocabularies can contain up to hundreds of thousands of concepts. In any particular use-case only a small fraction of these will be needed. In this paper we first define two notions of a disease-centric subdomain of a large ontology. We then explore two methods for identifying disease-centric subdomains of such large medical vocabularies. The first method is based on lexically querying the ontology with an iteratively extended set of seed queries. The second method is based on manual mapping between concepts from a medical guideline document and ontology concepts. Both methods include concept-expansion over subsumption and equality relations. We use both methods to determine a breast-cancer-centric subdomain of the SNOMED CT ontology. Our experiments show that the two methods produce a considerable overlap, but they also yield a large degree of complementarity, with interesting differences between the sets of concepts that they return. Analysis of the results reveals strengths and weaknesses of the different methods.</p
Teije. Reasoning with inconsistent ontologies
In this paper we present a framework of reasoning with inconsistent ontologies, in which pre-defined selection functions are used to deal with concept relevance. We examine how the notion of ”concept relevance ” can be used for reasoning with inconsistent ontologies. We have implemented a prototype called PION (Processing Inconsistent ONtologies), which is based on a syntactic relevance-based selection function. In this paper, we also report the experiments with PION.
Ten years of knowledge representation for health care (2009–2018): Topics, trends, and challenges
Background: In the last ten years, the international workshop on knowledge representation for health care (KR4HC) has hosted outstanding contributions of the artificial intelligence in medicine community pertaining to the formalization and representation of medical knowledge for supporting clinical care. Contributions regarding modeling languages, technologies and methodologies to produce these models, their incorporation into medical decision support systems, and practical applications in concrete medical settings have been the main contributions and the basis to define the evolution of this field across Europe and worldwide. Objectives: Carry out a review of the papers accepted in KR4HC in the 2009–2018 decade, analyze and characterize the topics and trends within this field, and identify challenges for the evolution of the area in the near future. Methods: We reviewed the title, the abstract, and the keywords of the 112 papers that were accepted to the workshop, identified the medical and technological topics involved in these works, provided a classification of these papers in medical and technological perspectives and obtained the timeline of these topics in order to determine interest growths and declines. The experience of the authors in the field and the evidences after the review were the basis to propose a list of challenges of knowledge representation in health care for the future. Results: The most generic knowledge representation methods are ontologies (31%), semantic web related formalisms (26%), decision tables and rules (19%), logic (14%), and probabilistic models (10%). From a medical informatics perspective, knowledge is mainly represented as computer interpretable clinical guidelines (43%), medical domain ontologies (26%), and electronic health care records (22%). Within the knowledge lifecycle, contributions are found in knowledge generation (38%), knowledge specification (24%), exception detection and management (12%), knowledge enactment (8%), temporal knowledge and reasoning (7%), and knowledge sharing and maintenance (7%). The clinical emphasis of knowledge is mainly related to clinical treatments (27%), diagnosis (13%), clinical quality indicators (13%), and guideline integration for multimorbid patients (12%). According to the level of development of the works presented, we distinguished four maturity levels: formal (22%), implementation (52%), testing (13%), and deployment (2%) levels. Some papers described technologies for specific clinical issues or diseases, mainly cancer (22%) and diseases of the circulatory system (20%). Chronicity and comorbidity were present in 10% and 8% of the papers, respectively. Conclusions: KR4HC is a stable community, still active after ten years. A persistent focus has been knowledge representation, with an emphasis on semantic-web ontologies and on clinical-guideline based decision-support. Among others, two topics receive growing attention: integration of computer-interpretable guideline knowledge for the management of multimorbidity patients, and patient empowerment and patient-centric care
- …
