3 research outputs found
Effect of shunt-dependency on long-term outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a post-hoc analysis of the EARLYDRAIN prospective patient cohort
No full textShunt-dependent hydrocephalus is common after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and has the risk to compromise the functional recovery of affected patients. This study investigated whether shunt-dependency is associated with the long-term outcome after aSAH. A post-hoc analysis was performed using the patient cohort of a prospective randomized controlled trial (EARLYDRAIN) conducted between 2011 and 2016. Patients were randomized for an early lumbar drainage (144 patients) or standard treatment alone (143 patients). Shunt insertion within 180 days after ictus was considered as shunt-dependency. The modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 180 days (mRS ≤ 2 equaling favorable outcome) was used for outcome assessment. The study population involved 287 aSAH patients with a mean age of 55 years. Shunt-dependent hydrocephalus was found in 29% of all patients. Patients without shunt-dependency had a better functional outcome at discharge (mRS 3.2 ± 2.0) compared to shunt-dependent patients (mRS 3.9 ± 1.5). Univariate analyses revealed worse functional outcome at 180 days in the patients with shunt-dependency compared to those without shung-dependency (mRS 2.8 ± 1.7, vs. mRS 2.2 ± 2.3). In multivariate analysis, adjusted for age, severity of the initial subarachnoid hemorrhage and the use of a lumbar drain, shunt-dependency was not associated with long-term outcome ( p = 0.26). After correction for age, treatment and SAH-grade, shunt-dependency did not show an association with the outcome in aSAH patients after rehabilitation. Clinical improvement due to rehabilitation after shunt insertion may be the explanation why chronic hydrocephalus per se does not represent an independent factor associated with long-term outcome
Role of clipping in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a post hoc analysis of the Earlydrain trial
No full textAbstract The choice between clipping and coiling of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) remains controversial. The recently published Earlydrain trial provides the opportunity to analyze the latest clip-to-coil ratio in German-speaking countries and to evaluate vasospasm incidence and explorative outcome measures in both treatment modalities. We performed a post hoc analysis of the Earlydrain trial, a multicenter randomized controlled trial investigating the use of an additional lumbar drain in aneurysmal SAH. The decision whether to clip or to coil the ruptured aneurysm was left to the discretion of the participating centers, providing a real-world insight into current aneurysm treatment strategies. Earlydrain was performed in 19 centers in Germany, Switzerland, and Canada, recruiting 287 patients with aneurysmal SAH of all severity grades. Of these, 140 patients (49%) received clipping and 147 patients (51%) coiling. Age and clinical severity based on Hunt-Hess/WFNS grades and radiological criteria were similar. Clipping was more frequently used for anterior circulation aneurysms (55%), whereas posterior circulation aneurysms were mostly coiled (86%, p < 0.001). In high-volume recruiting centers, 56% of patients were treated with clipping, compared to 38% in other centers. A per-year analysis showed a stable and balanced clipping/coiling ratio over time. Regarding vasospasm, 60% of clipped versus 43% of coiled patients showed elevated transcranial Doppler criteria (p = 0.007), reflected in angiographic vasospasm rates (51% vs. 38%, p = 0.03). In contrast to the Earlydrain main results establishing the superiority of an additional lumbar drain, explorative outcomes after clipping and coiling measured by secondary infarctions, mortality, modified Rankin Score, Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended, or Barthel-Index showed no significant differences after discharge and at six months. In clinical practice, aneurysm clipping is still a frequently used method in aneurysmal SAH. Apart from a higher rate of vasospasm in the clipping group, an exploratory outcome analysis showed no difference between the two treatment methods. Further development of periprocedural treatment modalities for clipped ruptured aneurysms to reduce vasospasm is warranted
Analysis of Cerebral Spinal Fluid Drainage and Intracranial Pressure Peaks in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
No full text<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Background</jats:title>
<jats:p>After aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) due to disrupted cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics is a critical concern. An external ventricular drainage (EVD) is commonly employed for management; however, optimal strategies remain debated. The randomized controlled Earlydrain trial showed that an additional prophylactic lumbar drainage (LD) after aneurysm treatment improves neurological outcome. We performed a post hoc investigation on the impact of drainage volumes and critical ICP values on patient outcomes after aSAH.</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Methods</jats:title>
<jats:p>Using raw patient data from Earlydrain, we analyzed CSF drainage amounts and ICP measurements in the first 8 days after aSAH. Outcomes were the occurrence of secondary infarctions and the score on the modified Rankin scale after 6 months, dichotomized in values of 0–2 as favorable and 3–6 as unfavorable. Repeated measurements were considered with generalized estimation equations.</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Results</jats:title>
<jats:p>Earlydrain recruited 287 patients, of whom 221 received an EVD and 140 received an LD. Higher EVD volumes showed a trend to more secondary infarctions (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.09), whereas higher LD volumes were associated with less secondary infarctions (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.009). The mean total CSF drainage was 1052 ± 659 mL and did not differ concerning infarction and neurological outcome. Maximum ICP values were higher in patients with poor outcomes but not related to drainage volumes via EVD. After adjustment for aSAH severity and total CSF drainage, higher LD volume was linked to favorable outcome (per 100 mL: odds ratio 0.61 (95% confidence interval 0.39–0.95), <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.03), whereas higher EVD amounts were associated with unfavorable outcome (per 100 mL: odds ratio 1.63 (95% confidence interval 1.05–2.54), <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.03).</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title>
<jats:p>Findings indicate that effects of CSF drainage via EVD and LD differ. Higher amounts and higher proportions of LD volumes were associated with better outcomes, suggesting a potential quantity-dependent protective effect. Optimizing LD volume and mitigating ICP spikes may be a strategy to improve patient outcomes after aSAH.</jats:p>
<jats:p><jats:italic>Clinical trial registration</jats:italic>: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01258257.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
