1,721,011 research outputs found

    Sandwich drug-eluting stenting: a novel method to treat high-risk coronary lesions

    No full text
    OBJECTIVES: To describe a novel approach to drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, the sandwich technique, comprised of the simultaneous implantation of two completely overlapping DES in the same target lesion.BACKGROUND: DES effectively prevent restenosis in selected coronary lesions. However, adverse lesion characteristics may detrimentally affect outcomes after DES implantation by means of plaque prolapse, recoil or excessive neointimal hyperplasia.METHODS: From July 2002 to November 2004, the sandwich technique was performed in 10 patients with very high-risk lesions. Two DES of identical size and length were implanted, one inside the other, with almost complete overlap. High-pressure postdilatation (up to 28 atm) was carried out in 6 cases. The endpoints of this preliminary evaluation were: technical feasibility, early (30-day) safety, restenosis rate and freedom from adverse events at 9-month follow up.RESULTS: Procedural and angiographic success was achieved in all cases. At follow-up, there were no deaths, myocardial infarctions or stent thromboses. All patients underwent angiographic follow-up; target lesion revascularization was carried out in 3 patients (30%). Of note, in no case was there evidence of aneurysmal remodeling.CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that implanting 2 DES, one inside the other in a sandwich fashion, is feasible and apparently safe. This approach could be considered in situations such as plaque prolapse or stent recoil where additional scaffolding may be needed

    Sixty-day readmission rate after percutaneous coronary intervention: predictors and impact on long-term outcomes

    No full text
    Thirty-day readmission rate after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is used as an index of quality of care, but the complete recovery from any myocardial damage needs 8 weeks. We evaluated the readmission rate 60 days after PCI, defined its predictors, and investigated its relationship with long-term prognosis

    Italian diffuse/multivessel disease Absorb prospective registry (IT-DISAPPEARS). Study design and rationale

    No full text
    The Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System (Absorb BVS) is an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold able to provide temporary scaffolding and antiproliferative drug delivery for the treatment of coronary artery disease. This temporary scaffolding could be the true feature to overcome the limitations of the conventional metallic stents. A growing body of evidence worldwide is supporting its implementation into daily practice as being associated with comparable results as the second-generation everolimus-eluting stent. However, these pieces of evidence come from 'studies in which the majority of the patients had low-risk stenoses', whereas patients with more complex coronary artery disease could benefit the most from the Absorb BVS technology. METHODS: The aim of the IT-DISAPPEARS is to investigate the procedural and clinical performance of the Absorb BVS in patients with long (>24 mm), single-vessel coronary disease or with multivessel disease. At least 50 centers across the Italian territory will enroll 1000 patients with either stable or acute coronary syndromes. Follow-up will end up at 5 years. Primary endpoint will be the cumulative hierarchical incidence of major adverse cardiac events at 1 year, defined as: cardiac death, nonfatal target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization. The efficacy as well as safety parameters will be evaluated along with a detailed evaluation of the dual antiplatelet therapy duration/interruption. CONCLUSION: The IT-DISAPPEARS could provide the first evidence worldwide concerning the performance of Absorb BVS in patients with high-risk diffuse coronary disease

    339 Interplay between COVID-19, pollution, and weather features on changes in the incidence of acute coronary syndromes in early 2020

    No full text
    Aims: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused an unprecedented change in the apparent epidemiology of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, the interplay between this disease, changes in pollution, climate, and aversion to activation of emergency medical services represents a challenging conundrum. We aimed at appraising the impact of COVID-19, weather, and environment features on the occurrence of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in a large Italian region and metropolitan area. Methods and results: Italy was hit early on by COVID-19, such that state of emergency was declared on January 31, 2020, and national lockdown implemented on March 9, 2020, mainly because the accrual of cases in Northern Italy. In order to appraise the independent contribution on changes in STEMI and NSTEMI daily rates of COVID-19, climate and pollution, we collected data on these clinical events from tertiary care cardiovascular centers in the Lazio region and Rome metropolitan area. Multilevel Poisson modeling was used to appraise unadjusted and adjusted effect estimates for the daily incidence of STEMI and NSTEMI. The sample included 1448 STEMI and 2040 NSTEMI, with a total of 2882 PCI spanning 6 months. Significant reductions in STEMI and NSTEMI were evident already in early February 2020 (all P < 0.05), concomitantly with COVID-19 spread and institution of national countermeasures. Changes in STEMI and NSTEMI were inversely associated with daily COVID-19 tests, cases, and/or death (P < 0.05). In addition, STEMI and NSTEMI incidences were associated with daily NO2, PM10, and O3 concentrations, as well as temperature (P < 0.05). Multi-stage and multiply adjusted models highlighted that reductions in STEMI were significantly associated with COVID-19 data (P < 0.001), whereas changes in NSTEMI were significantly associated with both NO2 and COVID-19 data (both P < 0.001). Conclusion: Reductions in STEMI and NSTEMI in the COVID-19 pandemic may depend on different concomitant epidemiologic and pathophysiologic mechanisms. In particular, recent changes in STEMI may depend on COVID-19 scare, leading to excess all-cause mortality, or effective reduced incidence, whereas reductions in NSTEMI may also be due to beneficial reductions in NO2 emissions in the lockdown phase

    Efficacy of new medical therapies in patients with heart failure, reduced ejection fraction, and chronic kidney disease already receiving neurohormonal inhibitors. A network meta-analysis

    No full text
    Aims We assessed the efficacy of the drugs developed after neurohormonal inhibition (NEUi) in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods and results The literature was systematically searched for phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving >= 90% patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <45%, of whom <30% were acutely decompensated, and with published information about the subgroup of estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Six RCTs were included in a study-level network meta-analysis evaluating the effect of NEUi, ivabradine, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), vericiguat, and omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) on a composite outcome of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for HF. In a fixed-effects model, SGLT2i [hazard ratio (HR) 0.78, 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.69-0.89], ARNI (HR 0.79, 95% CrI 0.69-0.90), and ivabradine (HR 0.82, 95% CrI 0.69-0.98) decreased the risk of the composite outcome vs. NEUi, whereas OM did not (HR 0.98, 95% CrI 0.89-1.10). A trend for improved outcome was also found for vericiguat (HR 0.90, 95% CrI 0.80-1.00). In indirect comparisons, both SLGT2i (HR 0.80, 95% CrI 0.68-0.94) and ARNI (HR 0.80, 95% CrI 0.68-0.95) reduced the risk vs. OM; furthermore, there was a trend for a greater benefit of SGLT2i vs. vericiguat (HR 0.88, 95% CrI 0.73-1.00) and ivabradine vs. OM (HR 0.84, 95% CrI 0.68-1.00). Results were comparable in a random-effects model and in sensitivity analyses. Surface under the cumulative ranking area scores were 81.8%, 80.8%, 68.9%, 44.2%, 16.6%, and 7.8% for SGLT2i, ARNI, ivabradine, vericiguat, OM, and NEUi, respectively. Conclusion Expanding pharmacotherapy beyond NEUi improves outcomes in HFrEF with CKD
    corecore