136,772 research outputs found
Jie yi lu Zhu shi sheng yu cong shu /
No full textCompilation attributed to Zhu Cheng by Zhongguo cong shu zong lu .Each work has speical t.p.Mode of access: Internet
Ruan Ji ji jiao zhu
No full textBen shu dui ruan ji de shi wen jin xing zhu pian xiao kan he zhu shi, ji chong fen xi shou qian ren de yan jiu cheng guo, ye you hen duo du dao jian ji
Li Yishan shi ji jian zhu
No full text朱鶴齡元本 ; 程夢星删補.綫裝.框18.8 x 14.3公分, 10行21字, 小字雙行31字, 四周單邊, 上下黑口, 單魚尾. 版心中鐫書名及卷次.出版年據第四卷.江都程午橋重訂, 東柯草堂校刊.乾隆年原板箋註義山詩集四卷, 卷首有大學士章印連平顏氏舊藏.Xian zhuang.Kuang 18.8 x 14.3 gong fen, 10 hang 21 zi, xiao zi shuang xing 31 zi, si zhou dan bian, shang xia hei kou, dan yu wei. ban xin zhong juan shu ming ji juan ci.Chu ban nian ju di si juan.Jiangdu Cheng Wuqiao chong ding, Dong ke cao tang jiao kan. Qing Qianlong ke ben.Qianlong nian yuan ban jian zhu Yishan shi ji si juan, juan shou you da xue shi zhang yin Lianping Yan shi jiu cang.Zhu Heling yuan ben ; Cheng Mengxing shan bu
Professor Cheng Ling Zhu, Professor Zhu Rong Lin, Professor Zhang Shi Quan and Professor Ma Jing Liang, 1994
No full textPictured during a visit to Swinburne are Left to Right: Professor, Ma Jing Liang, Director for External Affairs, International Technology and Economy Institute, China; Professor, Zhang Shi Quan, Assistant Research Professor, International Technology and Economy Insititute, Beijing; Professor Zhu Rong Lin, Director, International Technology and Economy Insititute, Shonghai Branch; Professor Les Kilmartin, Pro Vice-Chancellor (Academic) International Office; Professor Cheng Ling Zhu, Director, International Technology and Economy Institute, Beijing Office. Swinburne Staff News 14 April 1994
A Study of the Compilation, Influence, and Documentary Value of the Questions and Answers between Zhu Xi and Cheng Xun
No full text《朱程問答》是朱熹與程洵往來的書信集，其中保存朱熹寫給程洵的信件，以及程洵的回信。為了要瞭解這部著作的價值何在，本文分為三部分討論。首先探討的是此書的編纂背景。此書在明代由程氏家族的養子程資編輯，並且出資刊刻，其中最特殊的資料是家族中保存的先世遺墨，這批資料之所以受到重視，與程氏家族在明代刻意標榜以朱子學為家學有關。其次，此書為明代程曈纂寫《新安學繫錄》中的程洵傳記，提供第一手的資料，並且，清代夏炘也利用此書中所保存的信件，提出朱學三變之說。兩人都是為著建構徽州地區的朱子學傳承歷史而作。然而他們對於資料的使用，仍有值得商榷之處。第三，由於此書中，收錄朱熹的佚文以及程洵的書信，因此能夠提供更完整的線索，考訂兩人論學書信的編年問題，說明朱熹與林用中及葉仁的交往過程，以及朱熹早年對於《正蒙》和〈西銘〉的觀點，進而對照出朱熹和程洵在思想上的差異。The Questions and Answers between Zhu Xi and Cheng Xun records the personal correspondence between Zhu Xi and Cheng Xun, including the letters Zhu Xi wrote to Cheng Xun and Cheng Xun’s replies. In trying to fully understand the value of this collection, this article is divided into three sections. First investigated is the background to the compilation of this collection. It was compiled and funded during the Ming dynasty by Cheng Zi, an adopted child of the Cheng family. One of the most interesting types of documents in this collection is the ancestors’ manuscripts preserved within the family. These documents were highly valued because the Cheng family in the Ming dynasty put a lot of emphasis on Zhu Xi’s studies as their family teachings. Second, the collection provided first-hand information for Cheng Tong’s compilation of Cheng Xun’s biography in The Intellectual Lineage of Xin’an in the Ming dynasty. Also, Qing scholar Xia Xin used the correspondence preserved in the collection to support his observation of three changes in Zhu Xi’s theories. Both scholars made an effort to construct the heritage of Zhu Xi’s studies in the Huizhou area, but how they used the documents has problems. Third, since the collection includes Zhu Xi’s lost works and Cheng Xun’s letters, it provides historical evidence for reconstructing the chronology of these scholarly communications. It validates Zhu Xi’s association with Lin Yong-Zhong and Ye Ren, verifies Zhu Xi’s earlier views on Zhang Zai’s Rectifying the Ignorant and The Western Inscription, and reflects the ideological differences between Zhu Xi and Cheng Xun
Li Guangdi (1642-1718) and the official Cheng-Zhu learning in the early Qing = 李光地與清初官方程朱理學
No full textLi Guangdi (1642-1718) was a prominent figure in Early Qing. He was one of the most important scholars of the Cheng-Zhu School (程朱學派) and an influential politician. Many essays have been written on his political influence. However, there are still some aspects of his thought that have not been studied. This thesis attempts to analyze the thought of Li and appraise his role in the realm of Chinese Intellectual History.
The thesis also traces the origins of Li’s thought. Li was affected by both Cheng-Zhu School and Lu–Wang School (陸王學派) in Neo-Confucianism (宋明理學). Li combined the doctrines of the two schools instead of simply following the traditions of Cheng-Zhu. It resulted in the complicity of his thought. He was devoted to Cheng-Zhu School but his ideas on the Great Learning (Da Xue Da Xue , 大學) originated from the Lu–Wang School.
Li was also criticized for flattering the Kangxi Emperor (1654-1722, r. 1661-1722), an enthusiast of the Cheng-Zhu Neo-Confucian School, by adopting the Cheng-Zhu doctrines and belittling those of the Lu–Wang School in his studies. In fact, despite consulting the official Cheng-Zhu interpretation, Li always tried to synthesize the Cheng-Zhu, Lu-Wang and other Neo-Confucian ideas and give his own understanding in the preach of Confucian teaching.
The thesis also focuses on the comparison of the thoughts of Li with those of other official-scholars of the Cheng-Zhu School like Lu Longqi (陸隴其, 1630-1692) and Tang bin (湯斌, 1627-1687). Besides, it compares the similarities and differences in the scholarship between Li and the scholars of the Zhexi School (浙西學派) such as
as Zhang Lüxiang (張履祥, 1611-1674), Lof Philosophy at The University of Hong Kong in March 2017 1629-1683) and their followers ,who had never rendered their service to the Qing, revealing the interrelationships between scholars of the Cheng-Zhu School in Early Qing.published_or_final_versionChineseMasterMaster of Philosoph
Zhu wen gong jiao Changli xian sheng yi wen
No full text[韓愈撰 ; 朱熹校].綫裝, 1函(夾板函套)框19.7x12.7公分, 13行23字, 小字雙行同. 粗黑口, 四周雙邊, 雙黑魚尾. 版心下鐫葉次.原書高二十六公分.內封頁有筆錄"張菊生先生謂是書...相隨之元大德本元有編首序文""香港中文大學圖書館中國古籍庫"提供電子版.鈐有"小嫏嬛福地張氏收藏", "桐溪傳生", "屈向邦印", "蔭堂"諸印.Library's copy: 本館藏缺《遺詩》Xian zhuang, 1 han (jia ban han tao)Kuang 19.7 x 12.7 gong fen, 13 hang 23 zi, xiao zi shuang hang tong. Cu hei kou, si zhou shuang bian, shuang hei yu wei. Ban xin xia juan ye ci.Yuan shu gao er shi liu gong fen.Nei feng ye you bi lu "Zhang Jusheng xian sheng wei shi shu ... xiang sui zhi yuan da de ben yuan you bian shou xu wen"[Han Yu zhuan ; Zhu Xi jiao]."Xianggang Zhong wen da xue tu shu guan Zhongguo gu ji ku" ti gong dian zi ban.Qian you "Xiao lang huan fu di zhang shi shou cang", "Tong xi zhuan sheng", "Qu xiang bang yin", "Yin tang"zhu yin.Library's copy: ben guan cang que "Yi shi
HERITAGE AND IMPROVEMENT:FROM WANG BI’S ZHOUYI ZHU TO CHENG YI’S ZHOUYI CHENGSHI ZHUAN
No full textMain goal: Cheng Yi, like most neo-Confucian scholars in the Song Dynasty, was deeply influenced by Wang Bi’s thoughts on “Yi-ology”. The two scholars were very similar in their interpretation of the text of the “Book of Changes”. Both of them are renowned scholars of “Yi Li” school (or meaning-pattern) in which scholars study philosophical problems of the “Book of Changes”. We all know that Cheng Yi was a Confucian scholar. However, Wang Bi’s thoughtwas derived from Taoism. The hermeneutic method of “Zhouyi Zhu”(Wang Bi’s annotation of the “Book of Changes”) was inherited by Cheng Yi and removed the Taoist thought contained in this book.Cheng Yi absorbed Wang Bi’s thought and wrote the “Zhouyi Chengshi Zhuan” (Cheng Yi’s annotation of the “Book of Changes”). This paper will elaborate on aspects which Cheng Yi had absorbed Wang Bi’s thoughts and particularize improvements, which made by Cheng Yi, on Wang Bi’s “Yi-ology”
- …
