101,985 research outputs found

    Knapsack and the Power Word Problem in Solvable Baumslag-Solitar Groups

    No full text
    We prove that the power word problem for the solvable Baumslag-Solitar groups BS(1,q) = ⟨ a,t ∣ t a t^{-1} = a^q ⟩ can be solved in TC⁰. In the power word problem, the input consists of group elements g₁, …, g_d and binary encoded integers n₁, …, n_d and it is asked whether g₁^{n₁} ⋯ g_d^{n_d} = 1 holds. Moreover, we prove that the knapsack problem for BS(1,q) is NP-complete. In the knapsack problem, the input consists of group elements g₁, …, g_d,h and it is asked whether the equation g₁^{x₁} ⋯ g_d^{x_d} = h has a solution in ℕ^d

    Regular Separators for {VASS} Coverability Languages

    No full text
    We study regular separators of vector addition systems (VASS, for short) with coverability semantics. A regular language R is a regular separator of languages K and L if K ⊆ R and L ∩ R = ∅. It was shown by Czerwiński, Lasota, Meyer, Muskalla, Kumar, and Saivasan (CONCUR 2018) that it is decidable whether, for two given VASS, there exists a regular separator. In fact, they show that a regular separator exists if and only if the two VASS languages are disjoint. However, they provide a triply exponential upper bound and a doubly exponential lower bound for the size of such separators and leave open which bound is tight. We show that if two VASS have disjoint languages, then there exists a regular separator with at most doubly exponential size. Moreover, we provide tight size bounds for separators in the case of fixed dimensions and unary/binary encodings of updates and NFA/DFA separators. In particular, we settle the aforementioned question. The key ingredient in the upper bound is a structural analysis of separating automata based on the concept of basic separators, which was recently introduced by Czerwiński and the second author. This allows us to determinize (and thus complement) without the powerset construction and avoid one exponential blowup

    A Characterization of Wreath Products Where Knapsack Is Decidable

    No full text
    The knapsack problem for groups was introduced by Miasnikov, Nikolaev, and Ushakov. It is defined for each finitely generated group G and takes as input group elements g_1,…,g_n,g ∈ G and asks whether there are x_1,…,x_n ≥ 0 with g_1^{x_1}⋯ g_n^{x_n} = g. We study the knapsack problem for wreath products G≀H of groups G and H. Our main result is a characterization of those wreath products G≀H for which the knapsack problem is decidable. The characterization is in terms of decidability properties of the indiviual factors G and H. To this end, we introduce two decision problems, the intersection knapsack problem and its restriction, the positive intersection knapsack problem. Moreover, we apply our main result to H₃(ℤ), the discrete Heisenberg group, and to Baumslag-Solitar groups BS(1,q) for q ≥ 1. First, we show that the knapsack problem is undecidable for G≀H₃(ℤ) for any G ≠ 1. This implies that for G ≠ 1 and for infinite and virtually nilpotent groups H, the knapsack problem for G≀H is decidable if and only if H is virtually abelian and solvability of systems of exponent equations is decidable for G. Second, we show that the knapsack problem is decidable for G≀BS(1,q) if and only if solvability of systems of exponent equations is decidable for G

    Priority Downward Closures

    No full text
    When a system sends messages through a lossy channel, then the language encoding all sequences of messages can be abstracted by its downward closure, i.e. the set of all (not necessarily contiguous) subwords. This is useful because even if the system has infinitely many states, its downward closure is a regular language. However, if the channel has congestion control based on priorities assigned to the messages, then we need a finer abstraction: The downward closure with respect to the priority embedding. As for subword-based downward closures, one can also show that these priority downward closures are always regular. While computing finite automata for the subword-based downward closure is well understood, nothing is known in the case of priorities. We initiate the study of this problem and provide algorithms to compute priority downward closures for regular languages, one-counter languages, and context-free languages

    The complexity of knapsack problems in wreath products

    No full text
    We prove new complexity results for computational problems in certain wreath products of groups and (as an application) for free solvable group. For a finitely generated group we study the so-called power word problem (does a given expression u1k1udkdu_1^{k_1} \ldots u_d^{k_d}, where u1,,udu_1, \ldots, u_d are words over the group generators and k1,,kdk_1, \ldots, k_d are binary encoded integers, evaluate to the group identity?) and knapsack problem (does a given equation u1x1udxd=vu_1^{x_1} \ldots u_d^{x_d} = v, where u1,,ud,vu_1, \ldots, u_d,v are words over the group generators and x1,,xdx_1,\ldots,x_d are variables, has a solution in the natural numbers). We prove that the power word problem for wreath products of the form GZG \wr \mathbb{Z} with GG nilpotent and iterated wreath products of free abelian groups belongs to TC0\mathsf{TC}^0. As an application of the latter, the power word problem for free solvable groups is in TC0\mathsf{TC}^0. On the other hand we show that for wreath products GZG \wr \mathbb{Z}, where GG is a so called uniformly strongly efficiently non-solvable group (which form a large subclass of non-solvable groups), the power word problem is coNP\mathsf{coNP}-hard. For the knapsack problem we show NP\mathsf{NP}-completeness for iterated wreath products of free abelian groups and hence free solvable groups. Moreover, the knapsack problem for every wreath product GZG \wr \mathbb{Z}, where GG is uniformly efficiently non-solvable, is Σp2Σ^2_p-hard

    Regular Separability and Intersection Emptiness Are Independent Problems

    No full text
    The problem of regular separability asks, given two languages K and L, whether there exists a regular language S that includes K and is disjoint from L. This problem becomes interesting when the input languages K and L are drawn from language classes beyond the regular languages. For such classes, a mild and useful assumption is that they are full trios, i.e. closed under rational transductions. All the results on regular separability for full trios obtained so far exhibited a noteworthy correspondence with the intersection emptiness problem: In each case, regular separability is decidable if and only if intersection emptiness is decidable. This raises the question whether for full trios, regular separability can be reduced to intersection emptiness or vice-versa. We present counterexamples showing that neither of the two problems can be reduced to the other. More specifically, we describe full trios C_1, D_1, C_2, D_2 such that (i) intersection emptiness is decidable for C_1 and D_1, but regular separability is undecidable for C_1 and D_1 and (ii) regular separability is decidable for C_2 and D_2, but intersection emptiness is undecidable for C_2 and D_2

    Rational subsets of Baumslag-Solitar groups

    No full text
    We consider the rational subset membership problem for Baumslag-Solitar groups. These groups form a prominent class in the area of algorithmic group theory, and they were recently identified as an obstacle for understanding the rational subsets of GL(2,ℚ). We show that rational subset membership for Baumslag-Solitar groups BS(1,q) with q ≥ 2 is decidable and PSPACE-complete. To this end, we introduce a word representation of the elements of BS(1,q): their pointed expansion (PE), an annotated q-ary expansion. Seeing subsets of BS(1,q) as word languages, this leads to a natural notion of PE-regular subsets of BS(1,q): these are the subsets of BS(1,q) whose sets of PE are regular languages. Our proof shows that every rational subset of BS(1,q) is PE-regular. Since the class of PE-regular subsets of BS(1,q) is well-equipped with closure properties, we obtain further applications of these results. Our results imply that (i) emptiness of Boolean combinations of rational subsets is decidable, (ii) membership to each fixed rational subset of BS(1,q) is decidable in logarithmic space, and (iii) it is decidable whether a given rational subset is recognizable. In particular, it is decidable whether a given finitely generated subgroup of BS(1,q) has finite index

    Scope-Bounded Reachability in Valence Systems

    No full text
    Multi-pushdown systems are a standard model for concurrent recursive programs, but they have an undecidable reachability problem. Therefore, there have been several proposals to underapproximate their sets of runs so that reachability in this underapproximation becomes decidable. One such underapproximation that covers a relatively high portion of runs is scope boundedness. In such a run, after each push to stack i, the corresponding pop operation must come within a bounded number of visits to stack i. In this work, we generalize this approach to a large class of infinite-state systems. For this, we consider the model of valence systems, which consist of a finite-state control and an infinite-state storage mechanism that is specified by a finite undirected graph. This framework captures pushdowns, vector addition systems, integer vector addition systems, and combinations thereof. For this framework, we propose a notion of scope boundedness that coincides with the classical notion when the storage mechanism happens to be a multi-pushdown. We show that with this notion, reachability can be decided in PSPACE for every storage mechanism in the framework. Moreover, we describe the full complexity landscape of this problem across all storage mechanisms, both in the case of (i) the scope bound being given as input and (ii) for fixed scope bounds. Finally, we provide an almost complete description of the complexity landscape if even a description of the storage mechanism is part of the input

    Membership Problems in Finite Groups

    No full text
    We show that the subset sum problem, the knapsack problem and the rational subset membership problem for permutation groups are NP-complete. Concerning the knapsack problem we obtain NP-completeness for every fixed n ≥ 3, where n is the number of permutations in the knapsack equation. In other words: membership in products of three cyclic permutation groups is NP-complete. This sharpens a result of Luks [Eugene M. Luks, 1991], which states NP-completeness of the membership problem for products of three abelian permutation groups. We also consider the context-free membership problem in permutation groups and prove that it is PSPACE-complete but NP-complete for a restricted class of context-free grammars where acyclic derivation trees must have constant Horton-Strahler number. Our upper bounds hold for black box groups. The results for context-free membership problems in permutation groups yield new complexity bounds for various intersection non-emptiness problems for DFAs and a single context-free grammar

    Regular Separability in Büchi VASS

    No full text
    We study the (ω-)regular separability problem for Büchi VASS languages: Given two Büchi VASS with languages L₁ and L₂, check whether there is a regular language that fully contains L₁ while remaining disjoint from L₂. We show that the problem is decidable in general and PSPACE-complete in the 1-dimensional case, assuming succinct counter updates. The results rely on several arguments. We characterize the set of all regular languages disjoint from L₂. Based on this, we derive a (sound and complete) notion of inseparability witnesses, non-regular subsets of L₁. Finally, we show how to symbolically represent inseparability witnesses and how to check their existence
    corecore