4 research outputs found
Некоторые реликты активного строя в индоевропейских языках. Часть 4
Get PDFSome possible relics of the active(-stative) typology in the Indo-European languages, modern and ancient, are discussed. Indo-European languages are compared with the active Native American languages.Some possible relics of the active(-stative) typology in the Indo-European languages, modern and ancient, are discussed. Indo-European languages are compared with the active Native American languages
Über einige ethnolinguistische Mythen (am Beispiel des Russischen)
Get PDFThe last decade of the 20th century witnessed the resurrection of some ethnolinguistic theories in the countries of the former Soviet Union. Some of them can be traced back to the 19th century in the works of such linguists as W. von Humboldt and A. Schleicher, others seem to have their origin in the studies of A. Wierzbicka and F. Kainz. The authors of these theories tend to criticise Russian mentality reflected in the Russian language as fatalistic, irrational, etc. We will show that they are prone to ignore typological and historical factors that have preordained the structure of the modern Russian
Relikte des Aktivtypus im Russischen und finnougrische Substrateinflüsse
Get PDFAccording to such scholars as G.A.Klimov and W.P.Lehmann, the early Proto-Indo-European belonged to the languages of the active-stative typology or had some relics of this morphosyntactic type. In the languages like Russian, which have preserved their synthetic means of expression, the residues of the active-stative typology are still evident. In the article it is argued that in case of Russian some of these residues were «refrigerated» due to the influence of the Finno-Ugric substratum («refrigerator effect»)
