1,720,991 research outputs found

    Assessment of emphysema in COPD. A functional and radiologic study

    No full text
    OBJECTIVES: A combination of functional measurements reflecting a decrease in maximum flow, a degree of lung hyperinflation, the relationship between maximum inspiratory and expiratory flows, bronchodilator response, and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was used to quantify the extent of emphysema, as assessed by high-resolution CT (HRCT) scanning. DESIGN: Forced inspiratory and expiratory spirometry, lung volumes, reversibility test, and single-breath diffusing capacity were assessed before and after inhaling albuterol, 200 microg. Relationships between lung function variables and emphysema extent, as determined by HRCT scanning, were tested by univariate and multivariate analyses. SUBJECTS: Thirty-nine COPD outpatients with moderate-to-severe obstruction. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Emphysema extent, as assessed by HRCT scanning, ranged from 18 to 70%. All of the lung function parameters that were studied, except for the change in FEV1 percent predicted after salbutamol inhalation, correlated significantly with the extent of emphysema (r2 range, 0.19 to 0.44). Functional residual capacity, forced expiratory flow at 50% of FVC/forced inspiratory flow at 50% of FVC, DLCO/alveolar volume ratio, and bronchodilator-induced change in FEV1/FVC ratio were the only variables retained by stepwise multiple regression analysis. The multiple regression model explained 71% of the variability of emphysema extent measured by HRCT scanning. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of lung function measurements reflecting lung hyperinflation, bronchial collapsibility, lung diffusing capacity, and bronchodilator response provides a good estimate of the extent of emphysema, as evaluated by HRCT scanning. These data suggest that pulmonary function tests are useful in assessing and monitoring parenchymal damage in COPD patients

    Lung cancer resection: the prediction of postsurgical outcomes should include long-term functional results.

    No full text
    STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess (1) the possibility of predicting long-term postoperative lung function, and (2) the usefulness of maximal oxygen consumption (O(2)max) as a criterion for operability and as a predictor of long-term disability. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Outpatients and inpatients of a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-two consecutive patients (mean +/- SD age, 62 +/- 8 years; 51 male and 11 female patients) were preoperatively evaluated for lung cancer resection (pneumonectomy or bilobectomy [n = 14] and lobectomy [n = 48]). MEASUREMENTS: Clinical examination and recorded respiratory symptoms and spirometry results before surgery and 6 months after surgery. If predicted postoperative FEV(1) (ppoFEV(1)) was < 40%, patients underwent exercise testing; if O(2)max was between 10 mL/kg/min and 20 mL/kg/min, patients underwent a split-function study. RESULTS: All the patients with ppoFEV(1) > or = 40%-even those patients (26%) with FEV(1) or = 40%. ppoFEV(1) significantly underestimated the actual postoperative FEV(1) (poFEV(1); p 10 mL/kg/min became oxygen dependent and had marked limitation of daily living. CONCLUSIONS: ppoFEV(1) > or = 40% reliably identifies patients not requiring further tests and not at long-term risk of respiratory disability. O(2)max, effective for defining the immediate surgical risk, is not useful in predicting long-term disability
    corecore