37 research outputs found
Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019 a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants
No full textBACKGROUND: Hypertension can be detected at the primary health-care level and low-cost treatments can effectively control hypertension. We aimed to measure the prevalence of hypertension and progress in its detection, treatment, and control from 1990 to 2019 for 200 countries and territories. METHODS: We used data from 1990 to 2019 on people aged 30-79 years from population-representative studies with measurement of blood pressure and data on blood pressure treatment. We defined hypertension as having systolic blood pressure 140 mm Hg or greater, diastolic blood pressure 90 mm Hg or greater, or taking medication for hypertension. We applied a Bayesian hierarchical model to estimate the prevalence of hypertension and the proportion of people with hypertension who had a previous diagnosis (detection), who were taking medication for hypertension (treatment), and whose hypertension was controlled to below 140/90 mm Hg (control). The model allowed for trends over time to be non-linear and to vary by age. FINDINGS: The number of people aged 30-79 years with hypertension doubled from 1990 to 2019, from 331 (95% credible interval 306-359) million women and 317 (292-344) million men in 1990 to 626 (584-668) million women and 652 (604-698) million men in 2019, despite stable global age-standardised prevalence. In 2019, age-standardised hypertension prevalence was lowest in Canada and Peru for both men and women; in Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, and some countries in western Europe including Switzerland, Spain, and the UK for women; and in several low-income and middle-income countries such as Eritrea, Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Solomon Islands for men. Hypertension prevalence surpassed 50% for women in two countries and men in nine countries, in central and eastern Europe, central Asia, Oceania, and Latin America. Globally, 59% (55-62) of women and 49% (46-52) of men with hypertension reported a previous diagnosis of hypertension in 2019, and 47% (43-51) of women and 38% (35-41) of men were treated. Control rates among people with hypertension in 2019 were 23% (20-27) for women and 18% (16-21) for men. In 2019, treatment and control rates were highest in South Korea, Canada, and Iceland (treatment >70%; control >50%), followed by the USA, Costa Rica, Germany, Portugal, and Taiwan. Treatment rates were less than 25% for women and less than 20% for men in Nepal, Indonesia, and some countries in sub-Saharan Africa and Oceania. Control rates were below 10% for women and men in these countries and for men in some countries in north Africa, central and south Asia, and eastern Europe. Treatment and control rates have improved in most countries since 1990, but we found little change in most countries in sub-Saharan Africa and Oceania. Improvements were largest in high-income countries, central Europe, and some upper-middle-income and recently high-income countries including Costa Rica, Taiwan, Kazakhstan, South Africa, Brazil, Chile, Turkey, and Iran. INTERPRETATION: Improvements in the detection, treatment, and control of hypertension have varied substantially across countries, with some middle-income countries now outperforming most high-income nations. The dual approach of reducing hypertension prevalence through primary prevention and enhancing its treatment and control is achievable not only in high-income countries but also in low-income and middle-income settings. FUNDING: WHO.Fil: Zhou, Bin. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Carrillo Larco, Rodrigo M.. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Danaei, Goodarz. Harvard Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Riley, Leanne M.. WHO; SuizaFil: Paciorek, Christopher J.. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Stevens, Gretchen A.. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Gregg, Edward W.. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Bennett, James E.. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Solomon, Bethlehem. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Singleton, Rosie K.. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Sophiea, Marisa K.. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Iurilli, Maria LC. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Lhoste, Victor PF. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Cowan, Melanie J.. WHO; SuizaFil: Savin, Stefan. WHO; SuizaFil: Woodward, Mark. Imperial College London; Reino Unido. University of New South Wales; AustraliaFil: Balanova, Yulia. National Medical Research Centre for Therapy and Preventive Medicine; RusiaFil: Cifkova, Renata. Karlova Univerzita; República ChecaFil: Damasceno, Albertino. Eduardo Mondlane University; MozambiqueFil: Elliott, Paul. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Farzadfar, Farshad. Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center; IránFil: He, Jiang. University of Tulane; Estados UnidosFil: Ikeda, Nayu. National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition; JapónFil: Kengne, Andre P.. South African Medical Research Council; SudáfricaFil: Khang, Young Ho. Seoul National University College of Medicine; Corea del SurFil: Chang Kim, Hyeon. Yonsei University College of Medicine; Corea del SurFil: Laxmaiah, Avula. National Institute of Nutrition; IndiaFil: Lin, Hsien Ho. National Taiwan University; ChinaFil: Margozzini Maira, Paula. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; ChileFil: Rubinstein, Adolfo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública; Argentin
Mental Health of the Russian Federation Population versus Regional Living Conditions and Individual Income
No full textThe objective of our study was to assess the impact of regional living conditions on the Russian population’s mental health. For the analysis, we used data from the cross-sectional stage of a 2013–2014 study, “Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Diseases in the Regions of the Russian Federation (ESSE-RF)”. The final sample included 18,021 men and women 25–64 years of age from 11 regions of Russia. Using principal component analysis, we performed an integral simultaneous assessment of stress, anxiety, and depression. To describe the regional living conditions, we utilized five regional indices, which were computed from publicly available data of the Federal State Statistics Service of Russia. Overall, mental health indicators were improved, on the one hand, with the deterioration of social conditions and an aggravation of the demographic depression in the region, but on the other hand, they were improved with an increase in economic and industrial development, along with economic inequality among the population. In addition, the impact of regional living conditions on mental health increased with a higher individual wealth. The obtained results provided new fundamental knowledge on the impact of the living environment on health, using the case study of the Russian population, which has been little studied in this regard
S1 Data -
No full textSCORE2 (Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation 2) is a risk assessment scale for cardiovascular events, presented in 2021 by the European Society of Cardiology. Both for training and validation of the SCORE2 model, representative samples from the Russian population were not used. Therefore, we aimed to validate SCORE2 on a such sample. For this purpose, we used a sample from the ESSE-RF epidemiological study consisting of 7251 participants aged 40–69 years without history of CVDs. We performed the validation by comparing SCORE2 risk estimates for ESSE-RF participants with the observed incidence of cardiovascular events in the study, adjusted for event information losses. The validation demonstrated that SCORE2 risk estimates were accurate for Russian men and inaccurate for Russian women. Together with the quantitative assessment of risk, SCORE2 offers its interpretation in terms of 10-year CVD risk group: low-moderate, high, and very high. For Russian men we considered the original interpretation of the SCORE2 estimates to be questionable because almost none of the men would be categorized as having “low-to-moderate” 10-year CVD risk. This problem would be typical for all countries of the very high CVD risk region. Therefore, we proposed a new interpretation of the SCORE2 risk estimates for men from the very high risk region. According to the proposed interpretation, the fraction of men in ESSE-RF in “low-to-moderate” 10-year CVD risk increased from 2% to 18% and the fraction of men in “very high” CVD risk decreased from 63% to 20% as compared to the original interpretation. The proposed interpretation would allow a more personalized approach to CVD treatment and optimize the burden on primary healthcare in the very high risk region countries.</div
Distribution of ESSE-RF participating men.
No full textA: into SCORE risk groups; B: into SCORE2 risk groups of proposed cutoff values.</p
Distribution of the difference between SCORE2 and SCORE2-ESSE for ESSE-RF participants.
No full textDistribution of the difference between SCORE2 and SCORE2-ESSE for ESSE-RF participants.</p
Children’s exposure to television advertising of unhealthy foods and beverages across four countries of WHO European Region
No full textAbstract
Objective:
To compare the frequency and healthfulness of foods being advertised to children and adolescents in four countries of WHO European region.
Design:
Cross-sectional quantitative study, guided by an adapted version of the WHO protocol. All recorded food advertisements were categorised by categories and as either ‘permitted’ or ‘not permitted’ for advertising to children in accordance with WHO Regional Office for Europe Nutrient Profile Model.
Settings:
Four countries: Russia, Turkey, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan
Participants:
TV channels most popular among children and adolescents
Results:
Analysis included 70 d of TV broadcasting for all channels, during which time there were 28 399 advertisements. The mean number of advertisements per hour varied from eleven in Turkey and Kazakhstan to eight and two in Russia and Kyrgyzstan. In all countries, the majority of the food and beverages advertised should not be permitted for advertising to children according to the WHO Nutrient Profile Model. The mean number of non-permitted food and beverage advertisements per hour was high in Turkey and Kazakhstan (8·8 and 8·5 ads) compared with Russia (5·1) and Kyrgyzstan (1·9). Turkey was the only country where nutritional information was fully available, and no values were missing that prevented coding for some product categories.
Conclusions:
Results revealed that children and adolescents in four countries are exposed to a considerable volume of food and beverage advertisements, including sugary products on broadcast television. As such, policymakers should consider protecting youth by developing regulations to restrict these marketing activities within media popular with children
S1 Appendix -
No full textSCORE2 (Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation 2) is a risk assessment scale for cardiovascular events, presented in 2021 by the European Society of Cardiology. Both for training and validation of the SCORE2 model, representative samples from the Russian population were not used. Therefore, we aimed to validate SCORE2 on a such sample. For this purpose, we used a sample from the ESSE-RF epidemiological study consisting of 7251 participants aged 40–69 years without history of CVDs. We performed the validation by comparing SCORE2 risk estimates for ESSE-RF participants with the observed incidence of cardiovascular events in the study, adjusted for event information losses. The validation demonstrated that SCORE2 risk estimates were accurate for Russian men and inaccurate for Russian women. Together with the quantitative assessment of risk, SCORE2 offers its interpretation in terms of 10-year CVD risk group: low-moderate, high, and very high. For Russian men we considered the original interpretation of the SCORE2 estimates to be questionable because almost none of the men would be categorized as having “low-to-moderate” 10-year CVD risk. This problem would be typical for all countries of the very high CVD risk region. Therefore, we proposed a new interpretation of the SCORE2 risk estimates for men from the very high risk region. According to the proposed interpretation, the fraction of men in ESSE-RF in “low-to-moderate” 10-year CVD risk increased from 2% to 18% and the fraction of men in “very high” CVD risk decreased from 63% to 20% as compared to the original interpretation. The proposed interpretation would allow a more personalized approach to CVD treatment and optimize the burden on primary healthcare in the very high risk region countries.</div
Calibration coefficients for adjusted and unadjusted estimates.
No full textCalibration coefficients for adjusted and unadjusted estimates.</p
Distribution of SCORE2 and SCORE2-ESSE for ESSE-RF participants who meet SCORE2 target population criteria.
No full textDistribution of SCORE2 and SCORE2-ESSE for ESSE-RF participants who meet SCORE2 target population criteria.</p
Correspondence of SCORE2 and SCORE2-ESSE.
No full textA: men; B: women. The diagonal line shows where SCORE2 and SCORE2-ESSE match.</p
