16,719 research outputs found
Dissociation of posture remapping and cognitive load in level-2 perspective-taking: Raw data of three experiments
No full textYeh, Yei-Yu, Wang, Chi-Chin, Cheng, Shih-kuen, & Chiu, Chui-De. (in press). Dissociation of posture remapping and cognitive load in level-2 perspective-taking. Cognition
Rethinking Import-substituting Industrialization: Development Strategies and Institutions in Taiwan and China
No full textimport-substituting industrialization, export-oriented industrialization, development strategies, institutions
Supplemental Material - Clinical metagenomics-assisted diagnosis of relapsed HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis
No full textClinical metagenomics-assisted diagnosis of relapsed HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis by Ting-Kuang Yeh, Kuan-Pei Lin, Yu-Chuan Chuang, Li-An Wang, Chih-Jun Chen, Ding-Yu Lee, Yao-Ting Huang, Po-Yu Liu in International Journal of STD & AIDS</p
sj-pptx-1-cll-10.1177_09636897231221878 – Supplemental material for Proliferation and Differentiation Potential of Bone Marrow–Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells From Children With Polydactyly and Adults With Basal Joint Arthritis
No full textSupplemental material, sj-pptx-1-cll-10.1177_09636897231221878 for Proliferation and Differentiation Potential of Bone Marrow–Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells From Children With Polydactyly and Adults With Basal Joint Arthritis by Shih-Han Yeh, Jin-Huei Yu, Po-Hsin Chou, Szu-Hsien Wu, Yu-Ting Liao, Yi-Chao Huang, Tung-Ming Chen and Jung-Pan Wang in Cell Transplantation</p
Negation in Kavalan: A Syntactic Study
No full text摘要
本研究旨在管束句法學的理論架構下探討噶瑪蘭的否定詞，並回答以下問題：(1)每個否定詞的詞類為何？ (2)每個否定詞在句法結構上的位置為何？是否對應到NegP？ 若有，NegP 的位置為何？ (3)這些否定詞相互之間的結構高低為何？
本論主要分成兩部份。第一部份描述七個噶瑪蘭否定詞（mai、usa、naRin、sukaw、Ringu、taqa及 ita）的語意特性及句法分佈。第二部份則根據構詞特性、與其他成分的關係及時態、動貌、代名詞分佈的現象，進一步分析每個否定詞的詞類及句法結構。其相對結構高低也在第二部份中討論。
分析結果顯示，否定陳述句的mai及否定祈使句中的naRin應屬於否定助動詞，而否定等同句中的usa則歸類為否定繫動詞。這三個否定詞都對應到NegP（而NegP位於TP及AgrP之間），並有阻止V往上移至T或Asp的功能；於是否定詞本身會取代動詞上移承接時態或動貌詞素。
另一方面，否定所有句或存在句中的mai、sukaw、Ringu及taqa皆屬於否定動詞，除了本身帶有否定語意之外，與一般動詞無異。因此，這四個否定詞在句法結構上皆位於V而非Neg；換言之，其所對應的句型結構並不需要NegP的存在，是以雖然它們表達否定語意，卻不屬於否定句型。最後，ita歸類為否定質詞，因其用法固定不變
最後，本研究也針對噶瑪蘭語及其他南島語的主要否定詞之形式，提供類型學上的比較。Abstract
This thesis attempts to examine the negation in Kavalan within the framework of Government and Binding Theory and address the following questions: (a) What are the categorial statuses of the negative elements in Kavalan? (b) Where are their structural positions? Do they correspond to a NegP projection? If they do, where should the NegP be projected? (c) What is the structural hierarchy of these negative elements?
This study is primarily composed of two parts. The first part includes a descriptive discussion of the semantic properties and syntactic distributions of seven negative elements in Kavalan (mai, usa, naRin, sukaw, Rayngu, taqa, and ita). In the second part, the syntactic categories of these negative elements and the structures of the corresponding constructions are analyzed, in view of their morphological behaviors, their relationship with the following constituents/verbs, as well as the distribution of tense/aspect inflections and bound pronouns. The relative hierarchy of these negative elements is also discussed in the second part.
The results demonstrate that mai in declaratives and naRin in imperatives belong to negative auxiliary verbs while usa in equational sentences should be classified as negative copula. Each of these three negative elements heads a NegP between TP and AgrP and functions as a potential intervening head that blocks V from head-moving to T (or Asp). The Neg head instead moves upwards itself to pick up the tense/aspect inflections.
On the other hand, mai in possessives/existentials, sukaw, Rayngu, and taqa are categorized as negative verbs that are not any different from common positive lexical verbs except for their inherent negative feature. Consequently, they are structurally located as V heads which regularly undergo head-movement to pick up agreement, tense, and/or aspect morphemes. Since there is no need to project an additional NegP for the corresponding constructions, they cannot be called negative constructions though they indeed express negative meanings. Finally, ita is viewed as a negative particle due to its frozen expression.
In addition to a conclusion, the last chapter provides a typological comparison regarding the realization of main negators (i.e., mai, usa, naRin) in Kavalan and other Austronesian languages.Table of Contents
Abstract (English)……………………………………………………………………...i
Abstract (Chinese)……………………………………………………………………..ii
Table of Contents……………………………………………………………………..iii
Abbreviations and Symbols……………………………………………………..........vi
List of Tables………………………………………………………………………...viii
Chapter 1: Introduction………………………………………………………………..1
1.0 Goal…………………………………………………………………………..1
1.1 Kavalan profile……………………………………………………………….2
1.2 Sketch of Kavalan grammar………………………………………………….3
1.2.1 Phonemic inventory…………………………………………………...3
1.2.2 Word order…………………………………………………………….4
1.2.3 Voice system…………………………………………………………..5
1.2.4 Case-marking system…………………………………………………8
1.2.5 Personal pronominal system…………………………………………11
1.3 Organization………………………………………………………………...13
Chapter 2: Literature Review………………………………………………………...14
2.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………14
2.1 Previous studies on negation………………………………………………..14
2.1.1 Categorial status……………………………………………………..15
2.1.2 Projecting a NegP……………………………………………………18
2.2 Kavalan basic clause structure………………………………………………21
2.3 Summary.…………………………………………………………………....28
Chapter 3: Distribution of Negative Elements in Kavalan…………………………...29
3.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………29
3.1 mai…………………………………………………………………..............29
3.1.1 mai in declarative constructions……………………………………..29
3.1.1.1 Sentential negation…………………………………………...29
3.1.1.2 Constituent negation…………………………………….........34
3.1.2 mai in possessive/existential constructions………………….............37
3.1.2.1 Possessive sentences………………………………………….38
3.1.2.2 Existential sentences………………………………………….39
3.1.3 mai as negative answer………………………………………………41
3.2 usa…………………………………………………………………………..42
3.2.1 usa in equational constructions……………………………………...42
3.2.2 usa as negative answer………………………………………………45
3.3 naRin………………………………………………………………………..46
3.4 Other negative elements…………………………………………………….48
3.4.1 sukaw………………………………………………………………...48
3.4.2 Rayngu……………………………………………………………….50
3.4.3 taqa…………………………………………………………………..53
3.4.4 ita…………………………………………………………………….55
3.5 Negative elements and related affixes………………………………………55
3.5.1 -pama………………………………………………………………...56
3.5.2 -ma…………………………………………………………………...59
3.5.3 qa-……………………………………………………………………61
3.6 Double Negation vs. Negative Concord…………………………………….63
3.7 Summary……………………………………………………………………64
Chapter 4: Syntactic Analysis of Negation…………………………………………...67
4.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………67
4.1 mai…………………………………………………………………………..67
4.1.1 mai in declarative constructions……………………………………..68
4.1.1.1 mai not as V1 in serial verb constructions……………………69
4.1.1.2 mai not as a higher verb……………………………………...71
4.1.1.3 mai as an auxiliary verb……………………………………....74
4.1.2 mai in possessive/existential constructions………………………….82
4.1.2.1 mai in possessive sentences…………………………………..82
4.1.2.2 mai in existential sentences…………………………………..84
4.1.3 Summary…………………………………………………………….85
4.2 usa………………………………………..…………………………………86
4.2.1 usa not as a higher verb……………………………………………...87
4.2.2 usa as a negative copula……………………………………………..88
4.3 naRin………………………………………………………………….…….93
4.3.1 naRin not as V1 in serial verb constructions………………………...93
4.3.2 naRin not as a higher verb…………………………………………...94
4.3.3 naRin as an auxiliary verb…………………………………………...96
4.4 Other negative elements…………………………………………………….97
4.4.1 sukaw……………………………………………………………...…97
4.4.1.1 As ‘not good; bad’…………………………………………....97
4.4.1.2 As ‘forbidden’………………………………………………...99
4.4.2 Rayngu……………………………………………………………...101
4.4.2.1 As ‘not know’.………………………………………………101
4.4.2.2 As ‘incapable of; cannot’.…………………………………...103
4.4.3 taqa…………………………………………………………………105
4.4.4 ita…………………………………………………………………...108
4.5 Hierarchy of negative elements……………………………………………110
4.6 Summary…………………………………………………………………...112
Chapter 5: Conclusion………………………………………………………………115
References..................................................................................................................12
Pride Author event: Ellen van Neerven in conversation with Kevin Yow Yeh
No full textTo celebrate Pride Month, 2021 at QUT, QUT Library, in conjunction with Equity Services and QUT Faculty of Health held an online author talk with award winning writer Ellen van Neerven, in conversation with Kevin Yow Yeh (QUT Faculty of Health). Held 19 October, 12-1pm
Reticulaphis septica Yeh & Hsu, sp. nov.
No full textReticulaphis septica Yeh & Hsu sp. nov. (Figs. 14, 15) Apterous adult female. A small species, body ovate, black with purplish-blue burnish, marginal setae short and stout, with fan-shaped apices, body margin without waxy powder. Body 0.47–0.53 mm long, about 1.33 (1.27–1.41) times as long as wide, widest part at position corresponding to front legs, 2 shrunken furrows from prosomal margin to submargin at positions corresponding to front and middle legs. Antennae much shorter than space between them, L-shaped bend without segmentation, long arm about 25–37.5 μm with 1 minute rhinaria and 1 terminal seta near apex. Eyes submarginal, with 2 facets (some individuals with 3 facets). Prosoma distinctly reticulated with pale thin lines, dorsum with 3 deep transverse ridges on median area and several rounded areas surrounding it; 5 pairs of minute setae on central axis of prosoma, 1 st pair between eyes; prosoma with 10 pairs of marginal setae, all marginal setae short and stout, almost as long as long arm of antennae, with fan-shaped or serrated apices. Legs short, hind legs somewhat exposed; front and middle tibiae shorter than femora, hind tibiae equal to or shorter than femora; tarsi narrower than tibia, longer than wide; 1 long fine capitate seta on dorsal front tarsi, 2 such setae on middle and hind tarsi. Abdominal tergites II–VII about 140–157.5 μm wide and 57.5–67.5 μm long, also reticulated, without siphunculi and with 6 pairs minute setae along converging sides of tergites, only base tubercles visible. Abdominal tergite VIII an equilateral triangle, about 75–85 μm wide and 30–40 μm long, with 2 blunt, stout apical setae, nearly as long as marginal setae. Cauda knobbed, constricted basally. Subanal plate deeply bilobed, each lobe with 4–6 setae. Material examined. Holotype, Taiwan: Dashe Township, Kaohsiung Co., on Ficus septica, 9 -iv- 2006, H.T. Yeh (# 476). Paratypes, Taiwan: Luodong Township, Ilan Co., 28 -iii-2006, 22 apterous adults from F. septica (on 2 microscope slides) (Y.F. Chen # 469); Baihe Township, Tainan Co., 8 -iv-2007, 12 apterous adults from F. septica (C.C. Ko # 596); Da-an District, Taipei City, 21 -iv-2007, 14 apterous adults from F. septica (T.C. Hsu # 600); Dashe Township, Kaohsiung Co., 27 -v-2007, 48 apterous adults from F. septica (on 7 microscope slides) (H.T. Yeh # 608) (ANIC, BMNH, CDFA, NMNS, TARIIC, USNM). Etymology. The specific name ‘ septica ’ is derived from the associated host plant, F. s e p t i c a. Remarks. This species can be found in suburbs or hills, and feeds year round on new to mature leaves. The population density can be very high on mature leaves, and often causes serious sooty molds. This species differs from R. mirabilis in the pair of tiny setae between the eyes on the dorsal prosoma, and the comparatively stout marginal setae with distinctly fan-shaped apices of the prosoma; and differs from R. asymmetrica by the ovate body shape, and the pleural regions of prosoma not being expanded.Published as part of Yeh, Hsin-Ting, Ko, Chiun-Cheng & Hsu, Tung-Ching, 2008, Review of the East-Asian genus Reticulaphis (Aphididae: Hormaphidinae), with two new species, pp. 34-48 in Zootaxa 1782 on pages 45-46, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.27431
First α-ketoacyl complex with planar s-cis oxalyl configuration. Crystal structure of trans-[Pt(COCOOMe)(OH2)(PPh3)2] (CF3SO3)
No full text- …
