2,052 research outputs found
Development of a career coaching model for medical students
No full textPurpose: Deciding on a future career path or choosing a career specialty is an important academic decision for medical students. The purpose of this study is to develop a career coaching model for medical students. Methods: This research was carried out in three steps. The first step was systematic review of previous studies. The second step was a need assessment of medical students. The third step was a career coaching model using the results acquired from the researched literature and the survey. Results: The career coaching stages were defined as three big phases: The career coaching stages were defined as the “crystallization” period (Pre-medical year 1 and 2), “specification” period (medical year 1 and 2), and “implementation” period (medical year 3 and 4). Conclusion: The career coaching model for medical students can be used in programming career coaching contents and also in identifying the outcomes of career coaching programs at an institutional level
Definition of character for medical education based on expert opinions in Korea
No full textA single questionnaire with 3 major questions on character was distributed to medical education experts in Korea via e-mail. The questions were: “How would you define the ‘character’ that is required from a good doctor in the era of the fourth industrial revolution?”, “What are the issues of character education in current medical education (if any?)”, and “If you agree that there are any issue(s) of character education in current medical education, what possible solutions do you suggest?” The survey was distributed twice. In the first round of the survey, 145 e-mails were sent, and the response rate was 23.4% (34 responses). In the second round of survey distribution, 29 additional responses were gathered. Thus, responses from 63 medical education experts from 30 medical schools or colleges and 19 non-medical education experts were used in the final analysis
Interesting statistics regarding the papers published in Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions in 2017
No full textThis year, from January 1 to December 28, a total of 111 papers were submitted to Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions (JEEHP). Of these 111 papers, 88 were regarded as unsuitable because they did not follow the instructions for manuscript preparation for JEEHP, and some of the papers were eventually rejected or were resubmitted after revision. So far, 34 papers have been published this year, and 21 are in the processing stage. The acceptance rate is currently 27.4%, which is lower than the acceptance rate for 2016
- …
