1,721,045 research outputs found

    The Use of Race-Based Affirmative Action by Elite Colleges and Universities: Creating Alternatives

    No full text
    D.L.S.The practice of using race-based affirmative action to admit underrepresented ethnic minorities who, when comparing standardized test scores and grade point averages, are considered less qualified than Whites draws contentious public debate. Racial preferences remain unpopular, in large part, because most people realize that getting into a selective college often generates many advantages for the student. For instance, less selective colleges spend approximately 12,000perstudentwhilethemostselectiveuniversitiesexpendapproximately12,000 per student while the most selective universities expend approximately 92,000 per student. Employment wages are estimated to be 5 percent to 20 percent higher for graduates of selective colleges, and extensive research has shown that 54 percent of America’s corporate leaders and 42 percent of high government officials are graduates of just 12 of the top universities in the country.My thesis proffers, through an inferential and comparative analysis of several bodies of literature on the topic, that using race-based affirmative action in higher education, generally, and among selective colleges and universities, specifically, to bring about social equality is contrary to the policy’s original intended purpose. Moreover, affirmative action policy, as is currently used by selective colleges, causes greater harm than good. This is not to say that its application in the admissions process among selective college admissions is unnecessary, sinceivracism still exists in the United States. Rather, I argue that the current application of affirmative action policies by selective colleges causes a diminution of the policy’s true effectiveness. I further argue that because most inner-city elementary and secondary schools are bankrupt educationally, elite colleges and universities seeking to recruit well qualified minority candidates to their institutions would be better off investing resources to help uplift the academic performance of students in these inferior schools. In so doing, a larger pool of academically well prepared minority and poor students will be created. These better prepared students will then be able to effectively compete for entry into these elite colleges and universities based solely on their academic record.I examine the most common arguments used by proponents and opponents of affirmative action in college admissions and analyze and critique them in relations to the case law established by the Supreme Court cases in Bakke and Gratz and Grutter. Additionally, in my analysis, I use a “training for a race” metaphor to determine the cogency of the arguments advanced by proponents and opponents of racial affirmative action in relation to my thesis’ assertions that (1) affirmative action currently used by selective colleges in their admissions process is contrary to the policy’s initial intent; (2) although affirmative action is still needed to address discriminatory actions against Blacks in the admissions process, the top-down approach will not bring about social equality; (3) a bottom-up approach is needed to ensure a larger pool of Black students receive a quality education; and (4) race-based admissions will no longer be needed once Blacks are given the opportunity to compete effectively during the admission process.My thesis is entirely literature-based. It is a critical, theoretical analysis of the pertinent works extracted from the voluminous body of research dealing with race-based affirmativevaction in higher education among selective colleges and universities. Since the study is a liberal arts work that traverses many different disciplines, the methodological approach used to construct the doctoral thesis differs from any of the traditional, single-discipline methodology that is generally used to put together its findings. Where quantitative data is relied upon for an examination of social trends or policy implications regarding race-based affirmative action in higher education admissions, the research of William Bowen and Derek Bok, Jerome Karabel, Daniel Golden, Richard D. Kahlenberg, Anthony Carneval and Stephen J. Rose, Terry H. Anderson, and others are used to inform the study’s assertions
    corecore