1,721,057 research outputs found
Notes on types of Australian Chartocerus Motschulsky (Hymenoptera: Signiphoridae)
No full textMolin, Ana Dal, Woolley, James B. (2020): Notes on types of Australian Chartocerus Motschulsky (Hymenoptera: Signiphoridae). Journal of Natural History 54 (9): 681-702, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2020.178557
Noyesaphytis (Chalcidoidea: Aphelinidae) - an unusual new genus from Madagascar, and a reassessment of Aphelininae classification based on morphology
No full textPolaszek, Andrew, Lahey, Zachary, Woolley, James B. (2020): Noyesaphytis (Chalcidoidea: Aphelinidae) - an unusual new genus from Madagascar, and a reassessment of Aphelininae classification based on morphology. Journal of Natural History 54 (9): 647-664, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2020.177355
Figure 3 in Notes on types of Australian Chartocerus Motschulsky (Hymenoptera: Signiphoridae)
No full textFigure 3. Chartocerus australiensis orbiculatus (Girault), holotype ♂, Queensland Museum Type HY 2965. (a) habitus; (b) head; (c) fore and hind wings; (d) mesosoma; (e) legs; (f) genitalia.Published as part of Molin, Ana Dal & Woolley, James B., 2020, Notes on types of Australian Chartocerus Motschulsky (Hymenoptera: Signiphoridae), pp. 681-702 in Journal of Natural History 54 (9) on page 687, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2020.1785573, http://zenodo.org/record/429043
Figure 4 in Notes on types of Australian Chartocerus Motschulsky (Hymenoptera: Signiphoridae)
No full textFigure 4. Chartocerus beethoveni (Girault), holotype ♀, Queensland Museum Type Hy 2969. (a) habitus; (b) head; (c) antenna; (d) fore and hind wings; (e) mesosoma; (f) mesoscutellum, metascutum and propodeum.Published as part of Molin, Ana Dal & Woolley, James B., 2020, Notes on types of Australian Chartocerus Motschulsky (Hymenoptera: Signiphoridae), pp. 681-702 in Journal of Natural History 54 (9) on page 688, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2020.1785573, http://zenodo.org/record/429043
Figure 1 in Notes on types of Australian Chartocerus Motschulsky (Hymenoptera: Signiphoridae)
No full textFigure 1. Chartocerus australiensis (Ashmead), holotype ♀, USNM Type 4771. (a) head; (b) antenna, mesobasitarsus and mesotibial spur; (c) fore wing; (d) fore wing venation; (e) mesosoma; (f) metasoma.Published as part of Molin, Ana Dal & Woolley, James B., 2020, Notes on types of Australian Chartocerus Motschulsky (Hymenoptera: Signiphoridae), pp. 681-702 in Journal of Natural History 54 (9) on page 684, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2020.1785573, http://zenodo.org/record/429043
Figure 14 in Noyesaphytis (Chalcidoidea: Aphelinidae) - an unusual new genus from Madagascar, and a reassessment of Aphelininae classification based on morphology
No full textFigure 14. One of eighteen most parsimonious trees generated using successive approximations weighting from a phylogenetic analysis of 50 morphological characters (Length: 252; CI: 0.32; RI: 0.72). Bootstrap values greater than 50 are shown above branches. Eretmocerus hayati was designated as the outgroup. Taxa followed by an asterisk were described since Kim and Heraty (2012)Published as part of Polaszek, Andrew, Lahey, Zachary & Woolley, James B., 2020, Noyesaphytis (Chalcidoidea: Aphelinidae) - an unusual new genus from Madagascar, and a reassessment of Aphelininae classification based on morphology, pp. 647-664 in Journal of Natural History 54 (9) on page 660, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2020.1773559, http://zenodo.org/record/429035
FIGURE 1 in A revision of the New World sharpshooter genus Xyphon Hamilton (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellinae)
No full textFIGURE 1. Strict consensus of two equally most parsimonious trees using combined morphology and NADH (analysis II). Top numbers are bootstrap values (when over 50), bottom numbers are partitioned Bremer support values (upper number is morphology, lower number molecular). Tree length: 1,044, CI: 0.727 RI: 0.559.Published as part of Catanach, Therese A., Dietrich, Chris H. & Woolley, James B., 2013, A revision of the New World sharpshooter genus Xyphon Hamilton (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellinae), pp. 490-510 in Zootaxa 3741 (4) on page 494, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3741.4.3, http://zenodo.org/record/22160
Chartocerus gratius
No full textChartocerus gratius (Girault, 1932), described as Matritia gratia (Girault 1932) was not examined. Dahms (1984) notes that the syntypes are in Perth (DEAP) and that the type series is a single slide containing 10 damaged syntypes of both sexes. We have not been able to examine this material. Girault’s (1932) original description states ‘From hebes. Wing 1 sans cross-band. Middle tibial spur all pale; hind fringe wing 2 ½ widest. Western Australia, on Dactylopius, L.J. Newman’.Published as part of Molin, Ana Dal & Woolley, James B., 2020, Notes on types of Australian Chartocerus Motschulsky (Hymenoptera: Signiphoridae), pp. 681-702 in Journal of Natural History 54 (9) on page 700, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2020.1785573, http://zenodo.org/record/429043
Chartocerus australicus Girault 1913
No full textChartocerus australicus Girault, 1913 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: BE035C57-4B1D-4D49-97EF-C4154DFCB0B0 EOL taxon ID: 847848 (Figure 2; DOI:10.5281/zenodo.3894025) Girault (1913a, p. 226), as Signiphora australica (original description). Dahms (1983, p. 91): notes on type material. Type material. Holotype male, QM Hy 773 (T773; T4412), under cracked resin and coverslip, along with a specimen of Aphelinoidea howardi Gir. Transcription of labels as in Dahms (1983): ‘From window of a workmen’s quarters. Sugar farm, Nelson [= Gordonvale], N.Q. XII.21.1911 ’, ‘ Signiphora australica Girault, ♂ Type, Hy/773 4412, 4412 ’, and on the reverse of the slide, ‘Queensland Museum. TYPE, Hy/773 S’. Dahms (1983) lists two other slides at the QM, one topotypical, with the date of 4 December 1911 (paratype, male) and the other without locality information, on the same slide as the type of C. australiensis orbiculatus. The original description refers only to the two males from Nelson (‘in xylol-balsam, December 4 and 21, 1911 ’) and indicates Hy 773 as the type. Dahms (1983) also states that T4412 was a duplicate QM accession number for this specimen and had been cancelled. Description. Male. Length (pronotum to apex of epiproct): 0.6 mm. Body brown; metasoma and propodeum darker than head and mesosoma; antennae, genae and clypeus slightly lighter than surrounding areas. Head approximately round in frontal view, antennal scrobes evident, clava 7× as long as wide, 3 anelli (2:2:1), pedicel 2.5× as long as wide, scape 4× as long as wide, clava 2.5× length of scape. Many structures cannot be observed. Pronotum about 8× as wide as long. The other sclerites were crushed; margins are not discernible. The wings are not visible. Median propodeal sclerite seems to be coarsely reticulated like the remainder of the metasoma. Mt1 visibly bilobed.Published as part of Molin, Ana Dal & Woolley, James B., 2020, Notes on types of Australian Chartocerus Motschulsky (Hymenoptera: Signiphoridae), pp. 681-702 in Journal of Natural History 54 (9) on pages 685-686, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2020.1785573, http://zenodo.org/record/429043
Chartocerus ruskini Girault 1921
No full textChartocerus ruskini Girault, 1921 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: ED82C36C-9356-4A7F-AC82-C5E0103EAD62 EOL taxon ID: 847839 (Figure 10; DOI:10.5281/zenodo.3893747) Girault (1921, p. 188), as Signiphora ruskini (original description). Dahms (1986, p. 491): notes on type material. Type material. Holotype female, QM T4406, on a slide in bad condition, labelled: ‘ Lathromeroidea nigrella ♂,♀, Anaphoidea linnaei 2 ♀’s, Signiphora ruskini Gir. Type. ♀ 4406 | (red label) 4406). There are several coverslip fragments with several other damaged specimens, some of which do not appear to be listed on the label. The slide does not have date information, but in the original description, Girault indicates ‘Nelson, forest, 6 March 1919 ’. The propodeal sclerite was dissected; head, legs, wings and antennae were also separated. The head is broken and partially under a corner of the coverslip that is cracked. Description. Female. Length ~ 0.6 mm. Body mostly brown; scutellum, mesoscutum and pronotum slightly lighter than metasoma (the propodeum was dissected, so it appears lighter); the legs were removed, but were described as orange. Fore wing infuscation darker from base to under seta M4; remainder of wing lightly infuscated except for a hyaline basal area posteriorly and the very apex. Face striate, frontovertex with punctations more evident. Scutellum a little less than ½ length of mesoscutum. The fore wing setation seems to be similar to other Chartocerus but is slightly obscured. Fore wing 2.7× as long as wide, marginal fringe as long as slightly less than ½ maximum wing width. Mt1 bilobed.Published as part of Molin, Ana Dal & Woolley, James B., 2020, Notes on types of Australian Chartocerus Motschulsky (Hymenoptera: Signiphoridae), pp. 681-702 in Journal of Natural History 54 (9) on pages 697-698, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2020.1785573, http://zenodo.org/record/429043
- …
