1,720,995 research outputs found

    Dokumentation

    No full text
    Kapitlet omhandler vigtigheden af, at nyhedsjournalisten kan dokumentere sine påstande. Det tilbyder også en metode til, hvordan journalistens kvalitetssikrer sin nyhed

    Vinkling

    No full text
    Kapitlet introducerer til begrebet og værktøjet vinkling, som er essentielt for en nyhedsjournalist

    Nyheden som genre

    No full text

    Danish media framing of Brazil's 2018 election

    No full text
    This paper examines the Danish news media coverage of the 2018 presidential election in Brazil. In regard to population, Brazil is the seventh largest country in the world and the largest in South America. Despite this the Danish news media, in this study exemplified by Politiken, Berlingske and Danmarks Radio (DR), did little to nuance the debate and controversy surrounding the election — especially in regard to the far-right politician and current president, Jair Bolsonaro. Using qualitative framing analysis supported by thematic coding, this paper concludes that the coverage of the election by the Danish media was politically and culturally uninformed, potentially reinforcing the experienced cultural divide between the two countries’ populations. The coding found that the vast majority of DR and Berlingske articles covering the election were obtained through the news agency Ritzau, and that these articles had few, if any, sources retrieved by the journalists. Furthermore, we identified four frames recurring throughout the articles: 1) Bolsonaro is an enemy of Western values, 2) Bolsonaro is a threat to democracy, 3) Brazil is a country in chaos, and 4) the lesser of two evils

    Digital Kildebeskyttelse. Udfordringer. Idealer. Dilemmaer.

    No full text
    In journalism, the challenges concerning the protection of confidential sources have grown alongside the increase in surveillance. Almost every individual lays out a digital track by using a cell phone, browsing the Internet and sending e-mails, and this track can be used to hunt down and expose sources. Through qualitative interviews with a focus on everyday practices this thesis examines how ten investigative journalists from five of the largest national media outlets attempt to protect their confidential sources in a time where digital surveillance is ubiquitous. The study shows that all ten journalists are somewhat aware of the potential risks of being under surveillance and most of them have a clear idea of which digital communication services and platforms are more vulnerable to surveillance. However, the methods to enhance the digital security are not implemented consistently. Phone calls, un-encrypted e-mails, text messages and sharing of sensitive files through work e-mails are all part of the journalists’ day-to-day work, although some are very aware of trying to keep the most sensitive details out of telephone conversations, text messages and e-mails. Some go even further in trying to keep the communications off digital devices and services in order to keep the relation hidden from those who might have an interest in tracking down the source. Old-fashioned letters and physical meetings are included in the journalistic practice, albeit not always chosen as the method of contact. But the journalists argue, that the methods to enhance the level of security in communications with sources are too time-consuming and often difficult to establish with a source that is not well-versed in the digital world. For example it is the journalists’ experiences that very few sources use encryption, and therefore using encryption to heighten the security of the communication is not always an option. The study finds that these challenges give rise to a dilemma. On one side trying to live up to the democratic responsibility of gathering and conveying important information to society, not to mention the competitiveness of the media buisness and the perosnal gain of breaking a story, and on the other side, to live up to the ethical responsibility it is to protect a confidential source. This security dilemma could leave the journalists with a choice between publishing the story and risking the protection of their source, and deciding not to publish the story altogether, because of the lack of digital security. According to the journalists’ descriptions of their strong commitment to the protection of sources it seems an easy choice: the protection of sources is more important than publishing a story. However the journalistic practices do not always follow this ideal. Furthermore it is important to note, that the media organisations participating in this study, have policies concerning the ethical and responsible practice of journalism in general including the protection of sources, but at the time of the study none have guidelines specifically concerning digital security and the new challenges these impose.In journalism, the challenges concerning the protection of confidential sources have grown alongside the increase in surveillance. Almost every individual lays out a digital track by using a cell phone, browsing the Internet and sending e-mails, and this track can be used to hunt down and expose sources. Through qualitative interviews with a focus on everyday practices this thesis examines how ten investigative journalists from five of the largest national media outlets attempt to protect their confidential sources in a time where digital surveillance is ubiquitous. The study shows that all ten journalists are somewhat aware of the potential risks of being under surveillance and most of them have a clear idea of which digital communication services and platforms are more vulnerable to surveillance. However, the methods to enhance the digital security are not implemented consistently. Phone calls, un-encrypted e-mails, text messages and sharing of sensitive files through work e-mails are all part of the journalists’ day-to-day work, although some are very aware of trying to keep the most sensitive details out of telephone conversations, text messages and e-mails. Some go even further in trying to keep the communications off digital devices and services in order to keep the relation hidden from those who might have an interest in tracking down the source. Old-fashioned letters and physical meetings are included in the journalistic practice, albeit not always chosen as the method of contact. But the journalists argue, that the methods to enhance the level of security in communications with sources are too time-consuming and often difficult to establish with a source that is not well-versed in the digital world. For example it is the journalists’ experiences that very few sources use encryption, and therefore using encryption to heighten the security of the communication is not always an option. The study finds that these challenges give rise to a dilemma. On one side trying to live up to the democratic responsibility of gathering and conveying important information to society, not to mention the competitiveness of the media buisness and the perosnal gain of breaking a story, and on the other side, to live up to the ethical responsibility it is to protect a confidential source. This security dilemma could leave the journalists with a choice between publishing the story and risking the protection of their source, and deciding not to publish the story altogether, because of the lack of digital security. According to the journalists’ descriptions of their strong commitment to the protection of sources it seems an easy choice: the protection of sources is more important than publishing a story. However the journalistic practices do not always follow this ideal. Furthermore it is important to note, that the media organisations participating in this study, have policies concerning the ethical and responsible practice of journalism in general including the protection of sources, but at the time of the study none have guidelines specifically concerning digital security and the new challenges these impose

    Hvad har JEG dog gjort?: en rejse ud i jeg'et som journalistisk greb

    No full text
    Nærværende speciale er et såkaldt produktions/koncept-speciale, som består af en akademisk specialerapport og en artikelserie. I rapporten undersøger vi, hvordan man som journalist med fordel kan bruge sig selv og sit jeg eksplicit i sine journalistiske tekster. Med udgangspunkt i en række teoretikeres bud på jeg'ets styrker og på, hvad det kan tilføre en journalistisk tekst, efterfulgt af en analyse af, hvordan andre journalister har brugt deres jeg, udformer vi en værktøjskasse bestående af specifikke råd til journalister, der ønsker at skrive jeg. Med denne i ryggen, kaster vi os ud i selv at skrive jeg i en serie på seks længere artikler skrevet i hhv. jeg- og viform. Her undersøger vi vores eget og danskernes forhold til døden og drager til Mexico, hvor synet på døden er grundlæggende forskelligt fra vores. Dernæst reflekterer vi over vores artikler og de problemstillinger, vi har mødt på vejen. Vi diskuterer det centrale spørgsmål om, hvorvidt man kan skrive jeg uden at gå på kompromis med almindelige journalistiske krav om sandhed, saglighed og troværdighed. Afslutningsvis leverer vi med udgangspunkt i vores erfaringer et endeligt bud på en skarp ny værktøjskasse til journalister, der ligesom vi, har lyst til at eksperimentere med at skrive jeg. Denne Værktøjskasse er det nye, konceptet, i vores speciale.Nærværende speciale er et såkaldt produktions/koncept-speciale, som består af en akademisk specialerapport og en artikelserie. I rapporten undersøger vi, hvordan man som journalist med fordel kan bruge sig selv og sit jeg eksplicit i sine journalistiske tekster. Med udgangspunkt i en række teoretikeres bud på jeg'ets styrker og på, hvad det kan tilføre en journalistisk tekst, efterfulgt af en analyse af, hvordan andre journalister har brugt deres jeg, udformer vi en værktøjskasse bestående af specifikke råd til journalister, der ønsker at skrive jeg. Med denne i ryggen, kaster vi os ud i selv at skrive jeg i en serie på seks længere artikler skrevet i hhv. jeg- og viform. Her undersøger vi vores eget og danskernes forhold til døden og drager til Mexico, hvor synet på døden er grundlæggende forskelligt fra vores. Dernæst reflekterer vi over vores artikler og de problemstillinger, vi har mødt på vejen. Vi diskuterer det centrale spørgsmål om, hvorvidt man kan skrive jeg uden at gå på kompromis med almindelige journalistiske krav om sandhed, saglighed og troværdighed. Afslutningsvis leverer vi med udgangspunkt i vores erfaringer et endeligt bud på en skarp ny værktøjskasse til journalister, der ligesom vi, har lyst til at eksperimentere med at skrive jeg. Denne Værktøjskasse er det nye, konceptet, i vores speciale

    Everything for Women Digitally - The reason women use it. Context, control and identity in the digital women's magazine

    No full text
    By the use of qualitative interviews and Uses and Gratifications-theory, this thesis investigates five selected female readers’ user experience and consumption of the Danish weekly women’s magazine ALT for Damerne’s [Everything for women] digital platforms: the app Flipp, the website alt.dk, and their social media profiles on Facebook and Instagram. The analysis shows that the women use the digital magazine to gratify needs for access, price, inspiration, diversion and surveillance. Moreover, three factors have an impact on the women’s digital user experience and consumption: context, control and identity.The women find the reading experience with the printed magazine to be more gratifying, but accessibility and price outweigh the experience and are the main motivations for using the digital magazine. The digital platforms allow for the magazine medium to be used both sporadic and ritualized. Digital units in ritualized reading contexts are increasingly replacing printed magazines.Online commercials, hidden algorithms and the merging of content from several magazine titles on alt.dk cause the users to lose control of their user experience. Thus, the women using the app Flipp have a significantly better user experience because, because it takes place in a defined and closed setting. They have full control.The study finds, that the less of a connection the women have to the printed magazine, the happier they are with the website. This suggests that the digital platforms can coexist with the printed magazine and successfully be targeted at non-print magazine readers, whereas the app should be targeted at print readers.In contrast to previous studies, none of the women mention community or social desires as motivation to use the magazine. Only one out of the five women interacts with the magazine on social media. Hence, the magazine usage has become individual and singular. Yet, it is important to the women that they can identify with the content and use it in their everyday lives. Thus, my findings suggest a contrasting and complex digital user experience and consumption of ALT for Damerne

    Praktikprojektportfolie - eksamen

    No full text
    corecore