1,721,048 research outputs found

    Watkins, Eric. Eric Watkins interview, April 4, 1986.

    No full text
    Eric Watkins discusses his experiences as a logger. He discusses the history of the Pilley's Island area. He discusses Triton area history as well. He discusses isolated, outport life and government resettlement

    Alteration in spectral quality of natural sunlight by various photoselective gels during summer 2020 in St. Paul MN

    No full text
    Data included here show how various color correction, color conversion, or color effect photoselective gels alter the spectral quality of natural sunlight. Data were collected from three brands 1)LEE filters, 2)Rosco Cinegel, 3) Rosco e-color+, and 4) Rosco CalColor and from 45 photoselective gel models. Photoselective gels are primarily used to alter lighting quality for film and stage production, but photoselective gels can also be used to alter the spectral quality of sunlight in order for plant science researchers to simulate the spectral quality underneath foliage. These data will help plant scientists choose photoselective gels to match the spectral quality of shaded areas, and will help improve the research of the impact of shade on plant growth and development.National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Specialty Crops Research Initiative under award number 2017-51181-27222Minnesota State Agricultural Experiment Station Project no. 21-051Petrella, Dominic; Watkins, Eric. (2021). Alteration in spectral quality of natural sunlight by various photoselective gels during summer 2020 in St. Paul MN. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://doi.org/10.13020/8sj4-7j70

    Can Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Inoculum Improve Conditions of Various Golf Greens?

    No full text
    Poster presented at the 2020 ASA-CSSA-SSSA Annual Virtual MeetingObjective: Determine if repeated inoculations of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi would result in improved turfgrass quality, NDVI, and soil moisture of four different types of golf greens. Conclusion: Additional research is needed on the use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculations for established golf greens in northern climates.Sessoms, Florence; Schwab, Ryan; Watkins, Eric. (2020). Can Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Inoculum Improve Conditions of Various Golf Greens?. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/217505

    Association between Inflorescence Morphology and Seed Shattering in Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)

    No full text
    Poster presented at the 2020 ASA-CSSA-SSSA Annual Virtual MeetingThe objective of this preliminary study was to develop and implement an imaging system to explore the association between seed shattering and spike architecture. We found a significant association between spike morphology and seed shattering.Barreto Ortiz, Joan; Watkins, Eric; Ehlke, Nancy. (2020). Association between Inflorescence Morphology and Seed Shattering in Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/217506

    Effect of fungal endophyte on crown rust severity in perennial ryegrass and inoculation of perennial ryegrass with fungal endophyte

    Get PDF
    Faculty Advisor: Eric WatkinsThis research was supported by the Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program (UROP).Miller, Michael; Heineck, Garett; Ashbrenner, Brooke; Watkins, Eric. (2019). Effect of fungal endophyte on crown rust severity in perennial ryegrass and inoculation of perennial ryegrass with fungal endophyte. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/208673

    2010 University of Minnesota Turfgrass Cultivar Evaluation Results

    No full text
    Each year, the turfgrass research team at the University of Minnesota evaluates thousands of plots for turf performance. Typically, these evaluations are done visually, with a turfgrass researcher giving a score to each plot. The primary rating is “turfgrass quality”, which is rated on a scale of 1-9, with a 9 representing the best turfgrass quality and a 1 representing the poorest turfgrass quality. Turfgrass quality is a combination of traits that make a turf aesthetically pleasing, including color, density, freedom from disease and weeds, and uniformity. The results are separated by trial and planting year, and a table with all applications of fertilizers and pesticides along with other management information is also included.Hollman, Andrew; Watkins, Eric. (2011). 2010 University of Minnesota Turfgrass Cultivar Evaluation Results. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/202352

    2019 University of Minnesota Turfgrass Cultivar Evaluation Results

    No full text
    Each year, the turfgrass research team at the University of Minnesota evaluates thousands of plots for turf performance. Typically, these evaluations are done visually, with a turfgrass researcher giving a score to each plot. The primary rating is “turfgrass quality”, which is rated on a scale of 1-9, with a 9 representing the best turfgrass quality and a 1 representing the poorest turfgrass quality. Turfgrass quality is a combination of traits that make a turf aesthetically pleasing, including color, density, freedom from disease and weeds, and uniformity. The results are separated by trial and planting year, and a table with all applications of fertilizers and pesticides along with other management information is also included.Hollman, Andrew; Watkins, Eric. (2020). 2019 University of Minnesota Turfgrass Cultivar Evaluation Results. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/276490

    2023 University of Minnesota Turfgrass Cultivar Evaluation Results

    No full text
    Each year, the turfgrass research team at the University of Minnesota evaluates thousands of plots for turf performance. Typically, these evaluations are done visually, with a turfgrass researcher giving a score to each plot. The primary rating is “turfgrass quality”, which is rated on a scale of 1-9, with a 9 representing the best turfgrass quality and a 1 representing the poorest turfgrass quality. Turfgrass quality is a combination of traits that make a turf aesthetically pleasing, including color, density, freedom from disease and weeds, and uniformity. The results are separated by trial and planting year, and a table with all applications of fertilizers and pesticides along with other management information is also included.Hollman, Andrew; Watkins, Eric. (2024). 2023 University of Minnesota Turfgrass Cultivar Evaluation Results. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/276494

    2011 University of Minnesota Turfgrass Cultivar Evaluation Results

    No full text
    Each year, the turfgrass research team at the University of Minnesota evaluates thousands of plots for turf performance. Typically, these evaluations are done visually, with a turfgrass researcher giving a score to each plot. The primary rating is “turfgrass quality”, which is rated on a scale of 1-9, with a 9 representing the best turfgrass quality and a 1 representing the poorest turfgrass quality. Turfgrass quality is a combination of traits that make a turf aesthetically pleasing, including color, density, freedom from disease and weeds, and uniformity. The results are separated by trial and planting year, and a table with all applications of fertilizers and pesticides along with other management information is also included.Hollman, Andrew; Watkins, Eric. (2012). 2011 University of Minnesota Turfgrass Cultivar Evaluation Results. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/202353

    2017 University of Minnesota Turfgrass Cultivar Evaluation Results

    No full text
    Each year, the turfgrass research team at the University of Minnesota evaluates thousands of plots for turf performance. Typically, these evaluations are done visually, with a turfgrass researcher giving a score to each plot. The primary rating is “turfgrass quality”, which is rated on a scale of 1-9, with a 9 representing the best turfgrass quality and a 1 representing the poorest turfgrass quality. Turfgrass quality is a combination of traits that make a turf aesthetically pleasing, including color, density, freedom from disease and weeds, and uniformity. The results are separated by trial and planting year, and a table with all applications of fertilizers and pesticides along with other management information is also included.Hollman, Andrew; Watkins, Eric. (2018). 2017 University of Minnesota Turfgrass Cultivar Evaluation Results. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/202359
    corecore