3,160 research outputs found

    Eisenhower vs. Warren : the Battle for Civil Rights and Liberties (2018)

    No full text
    The epic 1950s battle that would shape the legal future of the civil rights movement is chronicled here for the first time. The bitter feud between President Dwight D. Eisenhower and Chief Justice Earl Warren framed the tumultuous future of the modern civil rights movement. Eisenhower was a gradualist who wanted to coax white Americans in the South into eventually accepting integration, while Warren, author of the Supreme Court’s historic unanimous opinion in Brown v. Board of Education, demanded immediate action to dismantle the segregation of the public school system. In Eisenhower vs. Warren, two-time New York Times Notable Book author James F. Simon examines the years of strife between them that led Eisenhower to say that his biggest mistake as president was appointing that “dumb son of a bitch Earl Warren.” This momentous, poisonous relationship is presented here at last in one volume. Compellingly written, Eisenhower vs. Warren brings to vivid life the clash that continues to reverberate in political and constitutional debates today.https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/fac_books/1100/thumbnail.jp

    The warren court and the black community, 1980

    No full text
    U.S. Supreme Court decisions involving the black community were studied for the 1953-1969 terms, the Warren Court ear. The hypothesis of the study was that after 1962 when the Court achieved a liberal majority the decisions would be more favorable to the black community than was true before 1962. This hypothesis was tested by the use of an eight point scale evaluation of each c-f the. sixty-eight cases studied. The hypothesis was proved correct. The Warren Court was more favorable to the black community during its liberal period than during its conservative period

    Charting the course for education in Newfoundland and Labrador; Social wrongs and school rights: a case simulation and analysis;

    No full text
    Question and answer period that focuses on right to search student lockers and whether there is a need to consult lawyers before school boards make decisions.Players in the mock case are: Beverley LeMoine, Richard Harvey, Reg Bonnell, Thomosina Cleal, Pamela Walsh, William Lee, Bill Whelan, Linda Doody, and Mary Power. The arbitration board is played by Dr. Michael Manley-Casimir, Dr. Romulo Magsino and Dr. Phil Warren

    Fly about round me coursing, swallow sweet birds come near [first line]

    No full text
    strophicpiano and voiceCover is duplicated in 125.115b.Johns Hopkins University, Levy Sheet Music Collection, Box 125, Item 115aTranslated From the French of Volney L'Hotelier by Samuel J. Gardner, Esq. The Music by Felicien David (Author of "Le Desert").E.G. Warren, Engr

    Fly about round me coursing, swallow sweet birds come near [first line]

    No full text
    strophicpiano and voiceCover is duplicated in 125.115b.Johns Hopkins University, Levy Sheet Music Collection, Box 125, Item 115aTranslated From the French of Volney L'Hotelier by Samuel J. Gardner, Esq. The Music by Felicien David (Author of "Le Desert").E.G. Warren, Engr
    corecore