136,938 research outputs found

    W. D. Waller

    No full text
    "SX 20995 W.D. Waller 6 AAT. Coy. Darwin '42/'43".SX 20995 W.D. Waller 6 Anti Aircraft and Tank Company. Darwin '42/'43

    Engraved portrait of Sir William Waller (bap. 1598?, d. 1668)

    No full text
    Engraved portrait of Sir William Waller (bap. 1598?, d. 1668). Line engraving by Nicholas Yeates after unknown artist, in oval with coat of arms. Titled: ' Sr. William Waller, Knight, Ob. Sept 19, 1669'

    lance-waller-lab/gateR: v0.1.11

    No full text
    Updated package URL and BugReports to renamed GitHub account "lance-waller-lab" (previously "Waller-SUSAN") Replaced if() conditions comparing class() to string with inherits() in functions tools is no longer Imports utils is now Suggests because "zzz.R" calls the packageDescription() function ncdfFlow, flowWorkspaceData are no longer Suggests (for generating random data set randCyto) because "Package suggested but not available for checking" in the some CRAN environments Added CITATION file Fixed typos in documentation throughou

    Bilateral and unilateral arm training improve motor function through differing neuroplastic mechanisms: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial

    No full text
    BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This randomized controlled trial tests the efficacy of bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing (BATRAC) versus dose-matched therapeutic exercises (DMTEs) on upper-extremity (UE) function in stroke survivors and uses functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine effects on cortical reorganization. METHODS: A total of 111 adults with chronic UE paresis were randomized to 6 weeks (3×/week) of BATRAC or DMTE. Primary end points of UE assessments of Fugl-Meyer UE Test (FM) and modified Wolf Motor Function Test Time (WT) were performed 6 weeks prior to and at baseline, after training, and 4 months later. Pretraining and posttraining, fMRI for UE movement was evaluated in 17 BATRAC and 21 DMTE participants. RESULTS: The improvements in UE function (BATRAC: FM Δ = 1.1 + 0.5, P = .03; WT Δ = -2.6 + 0.8, P < .00; DMTE: FM Δ = 1.9 + 0.4, P < .00; WT Δ = -1.6 + 0.7; P = .04) were comparable between groups and retained after 4 months. Satisfaction was higher after BATRAC than DMTE (P = .003). BATRAC led to significantly higher increase in activation in ipsilesional precentral, anterior cingulate and postcentral gyri, and supplementary motor area and contralesional superior frontal gyrus (P < .05). Activation change in the latter was correlated with improvement in the WMFT (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: BATRAC is not superior to DMTE, but both rehabilitation programs durably improve motor function for individuals with chronic UE hemiparesis and with varied deficit severity. Adaptations in brain activation are greater after BATRAC than DMTE, suggesting that given similar benefits to motor function, these therapies operate through different mechanisms

    Waller, D.

    No full text

    Centore-Bineau (D.), Saint-Just. Préface de G. Waller, 1937

    No full text
    Godechot Jacques. Centore-Bineau (D.), Saint-Just. Préface de G. Waller, 1937. In: Revue d'histoire moderne, tome 13 N°35,1938. pp. 465-466

    Centore-Bineau (D.), Saint-Just. Préface de G. Waller, 1937

    No full text
    Godechot Jacques. Centore-Bineau (D.), Saint-Just. Préface de G. Waller, 1937. In: Revue d'histoire moderne, tome 13 N°35,1938. pp. 465-466

    Data for Open water dreissenid mussel control projects: lessons learned from a retrospective analysis

    No full text
    We collected information on all open-water dreissenid mussel control projects that have occurred in North America through direct contact to natural resource professionals as well as an exhaustive review of published literature. We contacted resource managers and researchers within the invasive species community, including The Invasive Mussel Collaborative listserv (https://invasivemusselcollaborative.net), staff from control product vendors (i.e., Earth Science Labs, Marrone Bio Innovations, and ASI Group Ltd.), and staff within agencies who are known to have conducted treatments (i.e., Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MN DNR), US Geological Survey (USGS)), and others identified by the initial contacts. The final list was shared with the Invasive Mussel Collaborative to confirm all control projects were identified. We requested all available information on the control project from the project manager, including summary reports, raw data, personal communication, and maps. Available data were organized in a narrative format and Microsoft Access database (with CSV versions of each table in the zip file) and categorized into pre-treatment, treatment, or post-treatment activities.Dreissenid mussels are one of the most problematic aquatic invasive species (AIS) in North America, causing significant ecological and economic impacts in waterbodies where established. To date, dreissenid mussel control efforts in open water have included physical, biological, and chemical methods. The feasibility of successfully managing or even eradicating dreissenid mussels in lakes is relatively undocumented and unstudied in freshwater management literature. Additionally, control efforts are sometimes stymied by perceptions that the impacts to nontarget species will be unacceptable. The published literature evaluating both these two aspects is limited. Here, we present information on 33 open water dreissenid mussel control projects in 23 lakes across North America. Projects were categorized as rapid response eradication (n=16), established population eradication (n=8), suppression (n=3), or research (n=6).Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund as recommended by the Minnesota Aquatic Invasive Species Research Center (MAISRC) and the Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCCMR), and the State of MinnesotaFletcher Family FoundationPelican Lakes Association of Crow Wing CountyBay Lake Improvement AssociationDahlberg, Angelique, D.; Waller, Diane, L.; Hammond, David; Lund, Keegan; Phelps, Nicholas B. D.. (2022). Data for Open water dreissenid mussel control projects: lessons learned from a retrospective analysis. Retrieved from the Data Repository for the University of Minnesota (DRUM), https://doi.org/10.13020/azjm-w270
    corecore