332 research outputs found
Marriage record of Lingle, Benson W. and Whitehurst, Jessie B.
No full textMarriage license for Benson W. Lingle and Jessie B. Whitehurst. S.G. Evans was the Justice of the Peace
Address by Walter L. Lingle, Jr. for Industry Affairs
No full textIndustrial distribution of nasa technolog
Effect of EGTA on Acquisition of Thermotolerence in Soybean Seedlings " Plant Cel Wall as Biopolymers with Physiological Functions" Ya Mada
No full textTofu Case Study Statistical Analyses
No full textThis is the code and associated data that was used to generate conclusions for the following manuscript submitted for peer review:
Title: Implementation of ATP and Microbial Indicator Testing for Hygiene Monitoring in a Tofu Production Facility Improves Product Quality and Hygienic Conditions of Food Contact Surfaces: A Case Study
Authors: Jonathan H. Sogin(a), Gabriela Lopez Velasco(b), Burcu Yordem(b), Cari K. Lingle(b), John M. David(b), Mario Cobo(a), Randy W. Worobo(a)
(a)Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
(b)3M Company, St. Paul, MN, USA
Address correspondence to Randy W. Worobo, [email protected]
Whooping Crane Roost Site Characteristics on the Platte River, Buffalo County, Nebraska
No full textWhooping Crane (Grus americana) use of the Platte River in Nebraska has been a controversial topic, especially in the last decade. Pressures from water development interests seeking Platte River water conflict with the needs of wildlife and interests from the conservation community. Between spring 1942 and fall 1984 there were 13 confirmed Whooping Crane sightings on or near the Platte River (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 1985). Lingle et al. (1984) described physical characteristics of a Platte River roost site used in 1983. This report describes the physical characteristics of the most recent known roost site on the Platte River
Collective Rights and Individual Remedies: Rebalancing the Balance after Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.
No full textCollective bargaining agreements protect unionized workers by prohibiting discharges for other than just cause and by providing a grievance and arbitration process through which unjustly discharged employees can receive reinstatement and back pay. At-will employees historically had no such protection. In recent years, courts have made exceptions to the at-will rule, and wrongfully discharged employees now may recover tort damages. Because of the disparity in the damages recoverable in arbitration and tort actions, many unionized employees are ignoring collective bargaining agreements and suing for the tort of wrongful termination. In Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc., the United States Supreme Court held that wrongful termination claims by unionized employees are not preempted by federal labor law. This Article critiques the Court\u27s approach and argues that while judicial recognition of wrongful termination actions is providing needed protection for at-will employees, it may be having a negative impact on unions. The Article asserts that the Court demonstrated in Lingle the judicial failure to consider the effect of individual wrongful termination actions on collective bargaining. The author proposes a solution, including granting arbitrators the authority to award punitive damages, that would protect the policy underlying our national labor laws while maintaining the newly won job security of at-will employees
A course on the historical background and the literature of the great war, by Mrs. Thomas W. Lingle ...
No full text28 p
Collective Rights and Individual Remedies: Rebalancing the Balance after Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.
No full textCollective bargaining agreements protect unionized workers by prohibiting discharges for other than just cause and by providing a grievance and arbitration process through which unjustly discharged employees can receive reinstatement and back pay. At-will employees historically had no such protection. In recent years, courts have made exceptions to the at-will rule, and wrongfully discharged employees now may recover tort damages. Because of the disparity in the damages recoverable in arbitration and tort actions, many unionized employees are ignoring collective bargaining agreements and suing for the tort of wrongful termination. In Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc., the United States Supreme Court held that wrongful termination claims by unionized employees are not preempted by federal labor law. This Article critiques the Court\u27s approach and argues that while judicial recognition of wrongful termination actions is providing needed protection for at-will employees, it may be having a negative impact on unions. The Article asserts that the Court demonstrated in Lingle the judicial failure to consider the effect of individual wrongful termination actions on collective bargaining. The author proposes a solution, including granting arbitrators the authority to award punitive damages, that would protect the policy underlying our national labor laws while maintaining the newly won job security of at-will employees
Effect of EGTA on Acquisition of Thermotolerence in Soybean Seedlings " Plant Cel Wall as Biopolymers with Physiological Functions" Ya Mada
No full text- …
